secret hitler [7/7] (fascists win!)

[OkaPoka]

im lib, if im fasc i just claim 3 fascists?

[Anya]

should have considered whether oka would spite nein


rejecting this is bad though so dont do it

maybe it's peta bc of this it assumes okapoka is town

gypyx peta and bingles locked in

[Bingle]

1 lib card in deck at most, comp wise.

* if oka actually got a blue card, I should clarify.

[The toad]

not that those four can't contain regular fascists or whatever but it seems like it's less likely?

[OkaPoka]

why do i conf peta if anya scumreads me already, peta's in a blue gov etc. its a losing conf lololol

[Anya]

i agree

[Bingle]

oka, you're saying you got FFL for clarity, right?

[Hopkirk]

5 left in the deck with 1-2 liberals depending on conflict result right?

[OkaPoka]

yes

[The toad]

why do i conf peta if anya scumreads me already, peta's in a blue gov etc. its a losing conf lololol

Not sure why you wouldn't? Like, you are unlikely to be picked for gov again. I don't understand why your best play here wouldn't be to cast doubt that peta is fasc, as fasc. Worst case scenario, you waste the cop check right?

[petapan]

should have considered whether oka would spite nein


rejecting this is bad though so dont do it

maybe it's peta bc of this it assumes okapoka is town

gypyx peta and bingles locked in

what does this even mean

the assumption was oka was playign maybe unoptimally

[OkaPoka]

why do i conf peta if anya scumreads me already, peta's in a blue gov etc. its a losing conf lololol

Not sure why you wouldn't? Like, you are unlikely to be picked for gov again. I don't understand why your best play here wouldn't be to cast doubt that peta is fasc, as fasc. Worst case scenario, you waste the cop check right?

because i lose the conf 9/10 times, if i claim 3 reds people might be slightly more sus of me but i dont lose my spot in ever being in gov when it boils down to it

as it stands ill actually never be in gov whereas before there was a chance i could still gov

[Bingle]

5 left in the deck with 1-2 liberals depending on conflict result right?

Theoretically it could be three FYPOV as peta/me could be lying.

[Gypyx]

afk's taking longer than planned

[Datisi]

voting results

the government of president

bingle

and chancellor

hopkirk

PASSES!

JA (6/7)

1. hopkirk
   
2. petapan
   
3. bingle
   
4. the toad
   
5. okapoka
   
6. gypyx

NEIN (1/7)

1. anya

election tracker: 0/3

[Datisi]

FASCIST!

Game State

Table Order

1. bingle
   
2. hopkirk
   
3. gypyx
   
4. the toad
   
5. petapan
   
6. anya
   
7. okapoka

Liberal Policy Tracker [3/5]: [#][#][#][ ][!]

Fascist Policy Tracker [2/6]: [#][#][ ][ ][ ][!]

Exectutive actions with 7 players are

[

No power

][

Investigate Loyalty

][Call Special Election][Execution][Execution+Veto Powers Unlocked][Fascists Win]

Election Tracker [0/3]: [

*

][ ][ ][

!

]

Cards in policy deck: 2

Cards in policy deck when last shuffled:

6 Liberal

and

11 Fascist

the deck is being reshuffled.

bingle must investigate someone's loyalty card. bold to submit.

deadline: xx:02

[OkaPoka]

check me

[Hopkirk]

5 left in the deck with 1-2 liberals depending on conflict result right?

Theoretically it could be three FYPOV as peta/me could be lying.

i think that's only possible with Peta/Oka both scum which isn't likely

---

FF

[petapan]

t'actual answer is oka had to dump 2 reds on me because he likely loses otherwise

[Bingle]

why would I check in the 1v1?

Leaning anya, thoughts hoppy?

[Bingle]

Triple fascist, ofc.

[OkaPoka]

i agree i dump two reds on peta as fasc but why would i not claim three reds

[Anya]

is this the cop check?

[OkaPoka]

checking into the conf is like a double cop check

[petapan]

why would I check in the 1v1?

Leaning anya, thoughts hoppy?

anya isn't in the 1v1? it's me/oka