Same here. I keep having nightmares about there being big burly men in my back yardIn post 17, Jake The Wolfie wrote:I would love someone to be a bodyguard for me! You'll kill anyone that tries to hurt me because you'll stab me in the back and face!In post 16, T3 wrote:I should have inned for this on an alt. That way no one will know that I am behind them with a bloodstained knife.
Yeah exactly.In post 42, bugspray wrote:but that's a weird thing to do because thats the opposite of what scum should want to do
Well, the gambler's fallacy says you've gotta be town this time........ riiiiiight???In post 53, bugspray wrote:yeet me d1 again i fucking dare uIn post 49, Egix96 wrote:Yeah exactly.In post 42, bugspray wrote:but that's a weird thing to do because thats the opposite of what scum should want to do
I'm pretty sure that's not how Informed works. You get your information either along with your role, or on a specific night.In post 94, Roden wrote:It's entirely possible he was given more information and is waiting to share it at a more optimal time. Or, he might need to survive more rounds to gain more information. I don't think it would be hard to verify him as a Miller either.
Yeah. I really don't get why Titus just jumped on him there.In post 245, Jake The Wolfie wrote:I think Roden is likely to be Town here. Their mindset seems to be very town-oriented and in good faith, especially in post 240.
Only if they know there isn't a real miller.In post 259, DrippingGoofball wrote:Does that make miller a great claim for scum to hide behind? Yes/no
How does that even happen... I thought it was a three-strike system?In post 284, Rannygazoo wrote:Cw was prodded six times in our last game.
I will say, I think this is the most proactive I've seen you be on Day 1. I'm hesitant on whether I should judge your alignment from that though.In post 359, geraintm wrote:This sort of post isn't going to help right now. Delaying a claim so you can confer in your private thread isn't a good lookIn post 356, cw357 wrote:ig i might claim but this is ridiculous and ur sheeping ranny too much
Perhaps so, but I have a feeling a doctor might not be very useful this game.In post 387, Jessica Rabbit wrote:In post 380, cw357 wrote:town loyal doctorThis claim is believable, it doesn’t look like something scum would fakeclaim.In post 381, cw357 wrote:im a doctor but doc action only works if i target town
I'm not taking for granted that we might have a vig, since personally I see no indication of one.In post 403, VFP wrote:Because T3 told us that there's a macho.In post 398, Jake The Wolfie wrote:How would a Doctor be helpful if T3 is town?
Scum want to get Macho over Doc, so if doc hits right then a town life is saved, including PRs.
The threat here to scum is the Macho plus a plausible vig, not the Doc.
The annoyance to scum here is the Doc.
???In post 442, Roden wrote:If I wasn't so tunneled on DGB right now, and if I was more liable to make OMGUS votes, I'd probably jump on the Excall wagon. His line of posts doesn't look good and relies on a situation he essentially made up in his head to make work.
If you think I'm scum buddies with Ranny, I'd rather you just make a case than plant seeds for Day 2.
I genuinely do believe thisRannygazoo wrote:That’s me, perpetual exasperated townie
To last sentence: same here.In post 456, Jessica Rabbit wrote:Yeah, their recent posts seemed to be very superficial takes and I agree with the planting seeds thing. I think they don’t actually believe any of the nonsence they’ve been spewing. They only shaded me AFTER I expressed suspicions on them and when confronted they just double downed on their nonsense shade and made zero attempt to explain it.In post 447, Roden wrote:Then vote me and get a wagon going. See if you can get me to reveal if I have a PR or not. If you're not intent on doing this, then I'm comfortable in believing you just want to plant seeds for Day 2.
You're also blatantly trying to get around the fact you fucked up with the scum vs scum claim. If you could honestly deny it, a townie absolutely would by now. Or at the very least, a townie would admit they made a mistake. Why do you keep trying to talk around it?
I think I feel good with my vote.
Yeah, that was what I wasn't getting.In post 473, Titus wrote:I really don't get why stating something based off years of experience has been all this AI. Feels like I'm being pocketed.In post 416, cw357 wrote:In post 383, Titus wrote:Loyal is the correct modifier.maybe we're both wolves
could titus be telling me that to in essence pocket me or whatever
like trying to work into the townclears
it would be a big-brain strategy but not necessarily too far-fetched
i wouldn't mind the idea of the vig targeting titus and ill doc so that kill doesnt go through
although if vig is fakeclaiming it could get screwed up
That would make it odd to pocket me unless I might be the decider and one of the wagons might be on scum.
He's a claimed doctor
People do questionable stuff as town all the time. Usually it's best to just accept that it happened and move on.In post 606, Roden wrote:And why was Excall making those weird plays if he was Town the whole time?
We probably shouldn't yeet KA. That's my nugget of wisdom for today.In post 627, geraintm wrote:not much to say until everyone of interest says what happened....
What? Based on what you wrote in your previous post, it doesn't make sense to me for you to do this.In post 684, Roden wrote:KA if you believe Geraint is scum, then I'm down to vote him.
VOTE: Geraint
In post 683, Roden wrote:Interesting summary KA. Well mainly just condescending and desperate to appear funny and charismatic, but still interesting.(1)I think you accidentally exposed yourself though.
-Why did you bring up the "Gotcha!" attempt from DGB and Excall even though it was already settled? In fact, why did you ignore the fact check that came afterward? Why put this random suspicion on Jake?
-Why misinterpret what I said about Jessica? She didn't interact with her TRs, and my post was in response to a question about people scum reading her anyway.
-If you think Jake vs DGB isn't town vs town then why aren't either in your scum pool?(2)And why the hell isGeraintof all people in your scum pool instead if you barely even mentioned him?
-Geraint in general is an interesting choice for your scum pool. Your slot scum read him as well, but also backed off a few posts later and stopped pressuring him when other players began to do so.(3)You're doing something similar, as you're scum reading him but giving zero reason why and putting zero pressure on him. Why is this?
(1) You imply that KidAmn scumslipped.In post 684, Roden wrote:KA if you believe Geraint is scum, then I'm down to vote him.
VOTE: Geraint
If you think he's scum, why try to work with him?In post 703, Roden wrote:What strikes you as scummy about that?
- I mean "working with" in the sense of "helping out". As in, making it easier for Amn to push geraint if he wants to.In post 705, Roden wrote:What makes you think I'm trying to work with him?
Why aren't you questioning KA's summary, actually? Why is my vote odd but KA's scum read on Geraint isn't?
So the analogy is that CW not dying is more subtle than blatant? Is it just that?In post 724, KidAmn wrote:In post 717, Titus wrote:Right. Agreed here.In post 714, Egix96 wrote:Btw, if "sfumato" and "chiaroscuro" are words from another language, an explanation of what they mean is probably needed.sfumatois subtle, soft gradation between light and shadow in painting;chiaroscurois the opposite: stark contrast and clear, bold divides between the two.
Relatable.In post 770, DrippingGoofball wrote:Thirty-five hours is a prod dodge?
Sometimes I visit the thread and decide there isn't much to say.
Sigh yeah you're probably right.In post 776, T3 wrote:I think Roden is town.
All you've done since your initial catch-up is responding to questions, so I really don't get the impression that you are being proactive here.In post 783, KidAmn wrote:I'm nothing special, apart from the fact I'm a neighbour with someone who should know better.
You acknowledged that KA had claimed, and that Jake had stated an FoS, so I really don't get how you weren't aware that he was close to maj.In post 819, DrippingGoofball wrote:I apologize for yesterday's hammer, it was not intentional.
The cop will most likely have used both of their shots by now, so how does this help? Wouldn't it just make us risk losing the peeks?In post 849, T3 wrote:I have a theory. Now I know the last time I said this we ended up limming the doctor but I have a theory.
All the other prs out today.
The cop claims vt,the outs tomorrow.
At this point, yeah, it seems like he's trying to buy himself another day.In post 867, Jake The Wolfie wrote:I think T3's plan, if scum, would be a refuge in audacity. Why would scum make such a bold claim? To make you doubt that they are scum.
Roden's posts improved after I voted him, KA was underwhelming, and I felt that T3 was town from having skimmed his iso the previous day (rl time).In post 893, Rannygazoo wrote:Hey, I just remembered something.
Why this and then the reversal at the end of day 2 without even a comment?In post 631, Egix96 wrote:We probably shouldn't yeet KA. That's my nugget of wisdom for today.In post 627, geraintm wrote:not much to say until everyone of interest says what happened....
Well yeah, that's all you can say now.
You said that just when I was about to hit sendIn post 936, Roden wrote:Egix, we know you've read the thread. Please respond to the speculation around your role.
He is definitely in there though. There's just no day talk.In post 940, Roden wrote:Jake hasn't mentioned anything about getting Neighborized though? Actually, he stated his role made a Neighborizer unlikely to begin with.
Thonk.In post 690, DrippingGoofball wrote:Oh wait now I remembered he claimed informed miller. Never mind. I'm on crack.
Combined Neighborizer Strongman FinderIn post 943, Rannygazoo wrote:Skimming Jake’s iso, he is a lot more willing to believe in neighbors today. It checks out.
Why were you looking for strongmen in particular? If it’s a mechanical thing, please tell us the full name of your role.
Bolded part was my first impression, yeah.In post 952, Roden wrote:I'm a bit on the fence about believing this since it's a really weird combination, but if you're telling the truth then this actually explains a lot. Jessica died even though the Doctor supposedly targeted her because scum have a Strongman. CW's slot likely died on Day 2 because the possibility of a Strongman came up to explain the NK, and the WIFOM around the slot wasn't really working anymore.In post 946, Egix96 wrote:Combined Neighborizer Strongman FinderIn post 943, Rannygazoo wrote:Skimming Jake’s iso, he is a lot more willing to believe in neighbors today. It checks out.
Why were you looking for strongmen in particular? If it’s a mechanical thing, please tell us the full name of your role.They might only be an X-shot as well and had no choice but to get rid of the Doctor.
If all of this is true, you're essentially a makeshift Cop, Egix. You can really only find one scum, but that's still really powerful if you can guess right.
In post 984, T3 wrote:True :/
So we have a
JOAT
Vig Masons
Vig Masons
And Neghborizer as the pr claims
This and 1007 are the only reasons I'm not yet voting. Though to clarify, the power of my role lies in strongman-finding, not neighbour-making.In post 999, Rannygazoo wrote:Part of me wants totrust Roden’s mechanical clear of DGB, and another part of me wants to yeet DGB for sabotaging town’s information in a way scum normally only wishes they could.
I'm combined with Strongman Finder. I said this before.In post 1024, Titus wrote:How does a neighborizer find a strongman?In post 1023, Egix96 wrote:This and 1007 are the only reasons I'm not yet voting. Though to clarify, the power of my role lies in strongman-finding, not neighbour-making.In post 999, Rannygazoo wrote:Part of me wants totrust Roden’s mechanical clear of DGB, and another part of me wants to yeet DGB for sabotaging town’s information in a way scum normally only wishes they could.
Jake suggested targeting VFP so that scum couldn't sever the link between us by killing Jake.In post 1054, Rannygazoo wrote:Egix, why did you neighborize VFP? Whose idea was it, and how much did you discuss it?
It's talking about this post. The "sabotage" from Dgb is it dropping the hammer before the doctor slot could be replaced, leaving us with no hint as to whom the doc could have targeted.In post 954, Roden wrote:Fuck it, time to claim.
I'm a Jack of All Trades, but I won't yet say all of my abilities. This is why I played so chaotically, at least on Day 1. I needed a way to keep myself alive and I figured if I made myself a potential scapegoat for scum, they wouldn't target me. This is also why I picked a few fights, I wanted to see who'd bite so I'd have a better idea of who to Cop check.
On Night 1 I investigated Ranny using my Cop check, who came back asInnocent. Sorry that I messed with you so much Day 1, my intention was that if you turned up guilty, my continued push on you would look natural, and if you came up innocent then scum would leave both of us alive to fight and draw focus.
On Night 2, I used my Vig shot on DGB, because of course I'm going to after literally everything that happened. Seeing as the CW slot is now confirmed as a Town Loyal Doctor, I think it's safe to assume the replacement player read the situation and figured if we had a Vig, then they're most likely to shoot DGB after the hammer. So I'm confident DGB is now Town.
Scum could have a galaxy brain and somehow know I had a bullet and that I was going to shoot Night 2 and Roleblocked me, but at this point they're more likely to thinkI'mthe Traitor after causing so many disruptions and just generally being really bad at the game. Though if we have a Jailkeeper then they need to speak up if they jailed me or DGB.
Idk if I can prove my role since nothing affected the game, but Ranny and DGB are both confirmed town for me.
All it proves is that there is at least one scum in {Titus, VFP}.In post 1077, geraintm wrote:do you doubt my logic on why Titus is scum, with the hanging vote on VFP that never got finished off?
I agree that this makes Titus less likely to be the third member in the fake-masons world. But what I'm curious about is why VFP hasn't voted her back yet.In post 1079, Rannygazoo wrote:It’s hard for scum to coordinate three quick votes without day talk, but it would appear that Titus and VFP have opposite alignments.
If VFP is scum encryptor, then they do have day talk, but then of course they won’t be voting VFP.
In my experience, A50 has a very eccentric, hard-to-read playstyle, so I would say the second option seeing as it's definitely not the first.In post 1112, Rannygazoo wrote:Has anyone played with A50? Do they tend to prefer logical plays or moonshot intuitive plays?
The issue I have with this is that geraint quite openly didn't want the day to end prematurely, so the fault lies with those who ignored him, not geraint himself.In post 1117, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Geraintm, you were actively bringing the game to a halt because one player wasn't present, and now they're dead.
I would've targeted Titus were it not for Jake's suggestion, so yeah, there is that.In post 1131, Rannygazoo wrote:Could Jake have been steering Egix away from a strongman?In post 1057, Egix96 wrote:Jake suggested targeting VFP so that scum couldn't sever the link between us by killing Jake.In post 1054, Rannygazoo wrote:Egix, why did you neighborize VFP? Whose idea was it, and how much did you discuss it?
Later on, Jake told me that they had discussed with VFP, and that they had agreed that I should target the latter.
- Yes, I did.In post 1140, Rannygazoo wrote:That’s interesting. Did you tell Jake you were going to target Titus before he suggested that?In post 1138, Egix96 wrote:I would've targeted Titus were it not for Jake's suggestion, so yeah, there is that.
Another question:Why go along with neighborizing VFP and missing a chance to find the strongman?In post 1023, Egix96 wrote:the power of my role lies in strongman-finding, not neighbour-making.
In post 1156, DrippingGoofball wrote:I want to sheep Rannygazoo.In post 1152, Titus wrote:If you had to vote, who would it be for?In post 1146, DrippingGoofball wrote:I really don't know what to think.
The scum is winning for a reason: they're good at it.
In post 1157, DrippingGoofball wrote:Ranny, is it possible for there not to be any masons?
