You're right. Why would I have ever tried to talk to you about why I am suspicious of you. Why should I have ever expected you to engage with that conversation. Why should I have tried to gauge your reaction, or see if you had any kind of defense or response to the things that I was suspicious of. How silly of me.In post 648, VFP wrote:Then talk in the thread.
Just stop talking at me to why I'm scum (not other shit, I don't care if its other shit) That makes no sense regardless of my align though.
All you have done is said what I do and don't do here... Even to the point of saying I don't keep PMs and that I'm lying there, instead of me, actually lying about what a PM says.
It's a circle that I really don't care for and is taking up too many pages where people are just going to lazily say something like T/T and try to write it off which is the opposite of what I want here.
If you want to say reasons for me scum tell them not me.
Clearly your only response/defense is "lol, you think I am suspicious. That must mean you are 100% scum." (Which is still a confusing response from either alignment by the way. I will stop talking to you about it.
@everyone else - I outlined what made me suspicious 593 and 599 in case anyone is interested.
I don't think my vote is moving at this point, because backing down after VFP's response... I would rather flip them, even if it is just spite. Like, their response makes me want to dig my heels in here if anything.
I am down to be flipped tomorrow regardless of how VFP flips, by the way. If I am wrong, then sure - flip me because of this 1v1 nonsense.
If I am right, you should consider the possibility that the original scum team has always been the scum team, and flip me anyways.