Overall, yes.In post 716, T3 wrote:Frustration is NAI.
How it's portrayed, is AI.
Overall, yes.In post 716, T3 wrote:Frustration is NAI.
In post 724, House wrote:@ Bingle: what happened between those posts that made you decide to vote there?
In post 715, Bingle wrote:Really?In post 653, Almost50 wrote:the push on Norwee looked genuine
It seemed pretty inflated to me. I also didn't like the push on T3 that fizzled out or the response to me being indignant at being townread being an excuse about the difficulty of forming reads instead of, you know, not giving a shit. I feel like mastina as town is less apologetic about townreading me there.
Fullclaiming packs is dumb.In post 721, Dunnstral wrote:I'm also against claiming packs
The tone of this post feels of to me on a reread.In post 697, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Eh i should have tried to keep my cool more, i've tried to change my style recently where i don't act all flustered about being wagoned but i went back to my old roots again.
I'll evolve to an higher level of consciousness from this point on. In the grand scheme of things, these fights do not help me with solving. Better to settle this petty squabble and look at the game differently.
Now i don't think,
"this much effort"?In post 663, T3 wrote:Dunn putting this much effort into a game and the Mason claim which has no scum motivation is very +town AI, or so I've heard. I hav yet to see for myself.
Someone remind me why we're making house answer every question three times.In post 712, Infinity 324 wrote:This is the post in question for othersIn post 640, House wrote:I wouldn't call a flaccid, unexplained vote with no questioning or accusations much of a push.In post 623, Infinity 324 wrote:Though tbh I don't think it's fair to say I haven't looked for scum, I've pushed t3, a50, and house
Something something bureaucracy something triplicate.In post 731, NDMath wrote:Someone remind me why we're making house answer every question three times.
I forgot about 715 and missed it on my skim before I asked. Thanks!In post 726, Bingle wrote:In post 724, House wrote:@ Bingle: what happened between those posts that made you decide to vote there?In post 715, Bingle wrote:Really?In post 653, Almost50 wrote:the push on Norwee looked genuine
It seemed pretty inflated to me. I also didn't like the push on T3 that fizzled out or the response to me being indignant at being townread being an excuse about the difficulty of forming reads instead of, you know, not giving a shit. I feel like mastina as town is less apologetic about townreading me there.
A little exaggerated, but it does seem to have happened a couple times, yeah.In post 731, NDMath wrote:Someone remind me why we're making house answer every question three times.
Before Townstumps, I'd have had a very different answer for this question, but these days she seems to have a very different method for reading people that isn't very effective (at reading me, at least), unlike in the past when she could just soulread the hell out of me. If this game was happening in 2015-2016, I'd sheep the crap out of her but her play these days has certainly changed from what I remember.In post 732, NDMath wrote:@Infinity, What is your read on flea?
@House, Do you have thoughts on the mastina v norwee interaction?
When I say everything is different, I do mean literally everything. I mean night and day difference when I say it.In post 485, NorwegianboyEE wrote:You can’t actually describe what it is that’s scummy?
Infinity is saying things that appear town enough but I'm not convinced anything she's said or done isIn post 503, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Can you talk to me about your Infinity read?
Because while I think T3 has a decent chance of being scum, I'm notIn post 500, Bingle wrote:I’m rather interested in why mastina poked T3 over the push but never followed through.
I honestly can't tell.In post 508, House wrote:Do you really think scum!Norwee would give scum!Infinity those props?In post 484, mastina wrote:And I'm not convinced Infinity is town, sooooooooooo...In post 482, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Of all the players here Infinity should be the most qualified to read me imo.
I mean your entire iso is filled with inconsistent weird takes that are out of place from the Norwee-town that I've come to know, where your trajectory is all over the place in a weird way that doesn't fit with anything I've seen from you before.In post 552, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Jesus christ, i have one good read on rep in and it's now somehow suspicious?
By the way, don't fall for this--Norwee is trying to deliberately orchestrate a situation where the town writes off the fights with him as TvT.In post 557, NorwegianboyEE wrote:That kind of thing happens all the time, town goes into TvT and scum chooses their side accordingly while the main pusher is the fall guy for the inevitable townflip on any side.
No, no, goof fellas is an accurate description of me; I have sole ownership of the ':P' emote for good reason.In post 651, Almost50 wrote:GOOD! Good fellas not goof!! GODDMAN!
For the record, I not only see this, but also similarly to Dwlee, think that the scum think this, too. As in, just like I think the scum think Dwlee is obvtown (in spite of me not seeing Dwlee as obvtown) and thus Dwlee cannot be scum, I think the scum think Dunn is clearly town with a mason (just instead of me not seeing it, I also see it).In post 654, T3 wrote:1. Town Dunn thought "hey I should use masons!"
You know how it seems like 80% of players hide their online activity?In post 699, NorwegianboyEE wrote:But seriously, where is Mastina?
Big mood; you know how I've been doing.In post 683, Flea The Magician wrote:I am really struggling to get my head in this game -.-;
I mean, it wasn't exactly that simple.In post 737, House wrote:So, I'm putting zero stock in her certainty of her d1 read on Norwe because she was also sure I was scum in Townstumps.
And this is why you're subpoenaed to the jury dutyIn post 657, T3 wrote:What if everyone who has masondoesn't claimand then uses night 1. Anyone who receives a mason card will know the person who gave it to them is scum, and we could potentially end up with multiple confirmed town. If scum have masons this would also force them to waste their night 1 card choice.
Is that in the rules?? Let me checkIn post 658, T3 wrote:Never mind, there are only 2 masons max and Dunnstral has 1 so it doesn't really matter.In post 657, T3 wrote:What if everyone who has masondoesn't claimand then uses night 1. Anyone who receives a mason card will know the person who gave it to them is scum, and we could potentially end up with multiple confirmed town. If scum have masons this would also force them to waste their night 1 card choice.