[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 12868304 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Micro 1019: Dead Silence GAME OVER! - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #35 (isolation #4) » Sat Jul 03, 2021 2:17 am
Postby thana »
i was hoping to when i signed up though, felt there was a non-zero percent chance it would be similar to the first two phases of menagerie based on 'dead silence'
it is hard to imagine you think this would be +town
y
? you are familiar with bugspray and know that they are fairly likely to be pressured at some point anyway and it is hard to imagine you thinking, ah yes, let's just push bugspray to hammer range to... find the mafia?
like, do you currently think bugspray is more likely to be mafia than everyone else? or do you think this wagon will somehow discover bugspray's alignment?
Post
Post #110 (isolation #18) » Sat Jul 03, 2021 3:46 am
Postby thana »
In post 102, Menalque wrote:what, to your mind, is objectionable about having someone in hammer range? it's not particularly important that it's bugs but there's also no reason why it shouldn't be bugs, although this is I guess already yielding some kind of benefit
I don't particularly think bugs is more likely to be scum than anyone else or that the wagon will be *that* helpful in sorting them, but that's still not a reason to not get the wagon up
the last game i played in, of which you were a moderator, involved multiple wagons of this sort which were definitely not beneficial to the town, wagons aren't good just because, but once again, eh
Post
Post #112 (isolation #19) » Sat Jul 03, 2021 3:48 am
Postby thana »
In post 107, Menalque wrote:where? I just checked the sign ups and all the setup information provided was "yes" when asked about bastardry
i meant that there were prior references to post restrictions within this game before t3 fully dove into the i have a post restriction bit, making it less believable
Post
Post #120 (isolation #20) » Sat Jul 03, 2021 3:52 am
Postby thana »
In post 116, bugspray wrote:these two things (t3's bullshit and me asking you if you have a post restriction on page1) are completely unrelated. my guess is that the two of you share a PT
you don't think it is possible that t3 saw you ask about the post restriction and thought, ah yes i will do that? we do not share a pt
In post 187, Momrangal wrote:I am decidedly not a fan of burger defending one forming wagon, supporting the other growing wagon and doing literally nothing else.
Why do you find that to be scum-indicative? BurgerParty's votes and his reasoning for them felt fine to me.
@bugspray, could you please respond to 189? And what is supposed to be worrying about a 5-person PoE?
no
mm
it kinda feels like you have information that i do not
like i don't really disagree with momrangal about nathann's questions (question to t3 was weird, didn't necessarily seem like he cared about the answers until after her post)
In post 216, thana wrote:like i don't really disagree with momrangal about nathann's questions (question to t3 was weird, didn't necessarily seem like he cared about the answers until after her post)
but ...
What about it was weird? And I don't understand where you're getting the idea that I didn't care about the answers. I specifically poked him multiple times to try to get him to contribute normally.
But...?
felt like the possible answers were either ‘yes’ or ‘rvs’
maybe not as much that you didn’t care before as much as like, hm, made a show out of caring after? like reiterated my reiteration to bugspray of a question you asked?
? trying to find a way to communicate with me was pretty towny to me, but i am struggling to understand the neighbour thing and you are refusing to offer assistance,
how likely do you think it is that t3 would be aware of this post from normal blitz iii:
Post
Post #237 (isolation #36) » Mon Jul 05, 2021 4:26 am
Postby thana »
In post 235, Dwlee99 wrote:So you think that t3 could have been told by someone that there was a post you made a year ago that they could emulate on Bugspray for what reason?
well it seems most likely to me that if t3 were told of its existence it would have been by bugspray, i am unsure of what the reason would be, but it seemed like a very big coincidence to me,
Post
Post #245 (isolation #38) » Mon Jul 05, 2021 4:53 am
Postby thana »
In post 244, bugspray wrote:what if the dead silence relates to silencing of pts?
maybe there is some encryptor
i thought about this but there would have to be a massive amount of named players to also have a game with high enough swing where it was necessary to mention
also, hi! +)
though it seems likely to me you would have known this before, maybe not, hm
encryptor + neighbours/masons + at least two roles that create the swing? (i am assuming because i don't think a single vigilante qualifies a game as high-swing)
Post
Post #302 (isolation #44) » Tue Jul 06, 2021 8:58 am
Postby thana »
In post 300, Nathann wrote:It was basically nothing but setup speculation, based on practically no information. I cannot get anything alignment indicative out of it, and it doesn't help us solve the setup because, again, page ten, no actual information.
hm
how do you generally try to determine if someone is informed
Post
Post #306 (isolation #46) » Tue Jul 06, 2021 9:10 am
Postby thana »
In post 304, Nathann wrote:All it means to me is that you're taking up thread space with pointless discussion. If I had to come up with something, I could say that you're more likely to be scum because you're focusing on non-AI discussions, but then this game would have 7-8 scum. I don't give Town points for talking about an Encryptor when I think one is unlikely because it's not rocket science to be able to fake that as scum.
?? why would it mean town points if you find the encryptor to be unlikely? like i do not think this is in the game -> why didn't they reach a similar conclusion =/ town
but sure, pointless discussion if you'd like, they all are really
Post
Post #308 (isolation #47) » Tue Jul 06, 2021 9:39 am
Postby thana »
In post 307, Nathann wrote:Someone speculating about an Encryptor is more likely to be a Townie genuinely speculating about Scum power (that they don't know anything about), rather than Scum who's fake speculating about Scum power (that they know Scum doesn't have).
I thought that's the train of thought what you were aiming for when you asked me what does speculation about the Encryptor mean to me if I think one is unlikely. However, I'm saying I don't really believe that, because I think Scum fake speculating about something like that is not difficult to fake.
the encryptor wouldn't have to be scum power and also could be like 'enables talk in general' as opposed to 'daytalk' to solve your all pts have daytalk objection, though the other issues still stand
wasn't aiming for a train a thought, wanted to see how you think about these things
In post 307, Nathann wrote:It's pointless to me. Did you get anything about bugspray's alignment out of the discussion on page ten?
Though, now that I'm at my laptop and not working from memory, I'll admit to being wrong about page ten only being "setup speculation", as there was also discussion about that post from an old game. Doesn't change the fact it didn't help me sort either of you, but still putting it out there.
bugspray's discovery of me being me felt untimely, bugspray's reaction to the post made me doubt that theory more than either vfp/dwlee did, though vfp/dwlee mirrored reactions probably noteworthy, i do not know how to weigh those things,
Post
Post #309 (isolation #48) » Tue Jul 06, 2021 9:44 am
Postby thana »
In post 308, thana wrote:bugspray's discovery of me being me felt untimely, bugspray's reaction to the post made me doubt that theory more than either vfp/dwlee did, though vfp/dwlee mirrored reactions probably noteworthy, i do not know how to weigh those things,
and maybe i have more of an understanding as to where the neighbour conclusion came from?
Post
Post #342 (isolation #51) » Thu Jul 08, 2021 6:56 am
Postby thana »
In post 341, Dwlee99 wrote:Oh when he said too towny to be town okay yea I don't think my brain registered that as "Nathan was put to E-1 remember that." When you said "it happened two pages ago" I had to go back and reread to remember what happened.
hmm, why did you assume i unvoted and/or bugspray voted for t3?
Post
Post #347 (isolation #53) » Thu Jul 08, 2021 7:07 am
Postby thana »
In post 344, VFP wrote:I don't understand your point here.
felt weird for dwlee to return to voting nathann based on what i assume is still sheeping momrangal when they are suspecting t3 of being mafia, like i don't understand how they would be weighing that in that situation,
In post 345, Dwlee99 wrote:No like, I think I realized in the moment but I didn't record it in memory like that. Cause I remember seeing your unvote and thinking you didn't want someone in hammer range. I recorded the interaction as being t3 saying too townie to be town which I thought was more weird than E-1ing someone.
but i guess maybe its possible they just weren't, regardless of alignment, hm
Post
Post #351 (isolation #55) » Thu Jul 08, 2021 7:22 am
Postby thana »
In post 350, VFP wrote:Well there's a difference in suspecting someone and being confident.
If Dwlee labels Nathann as town due to being sus on T3, then it wouldn't be a genuine read and just an excuse to give a read on someone.
it felt to me like dwlee was being more confident on suspecting nathann than t3 and ignoring things t3 has done even though it seemed to me from their posts like they would be more confident on t3
Post
Post #352 (isolation #56) » Thu Jul 08, 2021 7:22 am
Postby thana »
In post 351, thana wrote:it felt to me like dwlee was being more confident on suspecting nathann than t3 and ignoring things t3 has done even though it seemed to me from their posts like they would be more confident on t3
In post 351, thana wrote:it felt to me like dwlee was being more confident on suspecting nathann than t3 and ignoring things t3 has done even though it seemed to me from their posts like they would be more confident on t3
but also could be things not posted,
what kind of things not posted public?
who is in the pt
who said what to who
i meant if dwlee's reads on nathann/t3 were informed by things they did not commit to the thread,
like mine are so it'd unfair of me to be like 'dwlee is only sheeping momrangal' with regards to nathann,
Post
Post #366 (isolation #59) » Thu Jul 08, 2021 9:36 am
Postby thana »
In post 364, Menalque wrote:I don't like the Nathan wagon, VFP/dwlee are not really doing The Good Posting and the "VFP sell me on T3 town" seems like a very easy way to have interactions that are very low-stakes and allow the two to interact while also going for a hard pocket