with 9 votes in play, it takes 5 to make a decision. day 1 ends in (expired on 2021-08-13 20:45:00).
Last edited by Datisi on Wed Jul 28, 2021 10:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
I will straight up disregard all reason if you have a PR dream again. You can come back and be like, “I dreamt that Locke is a N2 Bulletproof Multitasking Cop and Self-Targeting Doctor,” and I will go, “Okay, Locke kill it is then.”
I wasn't a fan of Cheeky's posting but she's trying to put out content. I contrast that to Vulture, who instead of giving hasty alignment speculation lingered aimlessly on mechanics.
I already have this hydra as a townlean though, not because of Cheeky but because of Gamma.
Gamma has been tilted out of his mind lately by people not efforting as scum/a rapidfire town getting ahead early. He's learned to play significantly faster paced accordingly in order to avoid this. Here he was content to pop in and leave it to Cheeky; in contrast scumGamma has been of this bizarre mindset that he's the one carrying every game even when he gets flipped Day 1/2 like clockwork.
I don't really have a read on Vulture, curious as to why Implosion has them as town (I don't think GL's reasoning there is bad, it's an interesting mistake)
In post 42, The Cheek of Gamma wrote:I'm terrible at town hunting, so this should be a fun exercise. I think I'll probably just scum hunt for both and whoever is not leaning nai/scum can go in the coalition.
My logic on VultureTown is basically the earnestness with which they seem interested in reasoning out the bet way to do setup things. In particular the second line of 61 feels like something scum who wants to be in the coalition would be reticent to say. I don't really mind the setup spec for its own sake particularly since they dropped it now.
In post 89, implosion wrote:My logic on VultureTown is basically the earnestness with which they seem interested in reasoning out the bet way to do setup things. In particular the second line of 61 feels like something scum who wants to be in the coalition would be reticent to say. I don't really mind the setup spec for its own sake particularly since they dropped it now.
I think this is so straightforward to fake, in contrast to GuiltyLion, and I already want to dayvig you for it.
"earnestness in reasoning out the setup" is awful.
I feel like this gamestate should spew me town because someone who is named "the coalition" clearly would be a threat to scum ergo the lack of initial trust from literally anyone should be indicative that I'm town from that but i guess thats just me being TMI on my own slot
GL reasoning works backwards, starting at "this person is X" and then tries to manufacture reasons for it. I'm not sure where people get townreads on that but its like blatantly scum and I'm vetoing all coalitions with them on it.
Implo reasoning has depth ergo - >rand towny. I have never played with them and they give the vibe they're a good player so holistically this isn't a solid reason but I'm going to stick to it for the purpose of coalition building.
also general suggestion is to use the coalition itself as pressure as it scares scum a lot more to see their name excluded on lists. I had people voting me in the last iteration and it had 0 effect on pressure(I was town tho), but seeing ppl not include my name made me feel pressured to get on.