Agree but I think thier content has been /towny/ enough.In post 315, LicketyQuickety wrote:I keep feeling like alstro is not really doing much. I feel like they are just posting to post - like they know they have to post something so they do, but none of it is really convincing because of so much hedging language (which is usually a Scum tell).
What are you seeing about Strange that is Townie? Hard for me to get a read there. Why did Margot move to Null?In post 325, HockeyFan wrote:Agree but I think thier content has been /towny/ enough.In post 315, LicketyQuickety wrote:I keep feeling like alstro is not really doing much. I feel like they are just posting to post - like they know they have to post something so they do, but none of it is really convincing because of so much hedging language (which is usually a Scum tell).
My reads are pretty similar to 231 except maybe havign strange as a tl, and margot to null
My point was more that this was the reason I saw that people backed down from SRing you. My reasoning has been detailed elsewhere, and my point was that you haven't done much to assuage those suspicions. You are far from LS for me, but definitely on my radar.In post 317, LicketyQuickety wrote:If I have your reasoning right for why I am Scum it is because my defensiveness changed after you said I was being defensive? And that just because the wagon developed doesn't mean I am Town? I can still be reasonable sometimes just like I can be defensive sometimes. When I explained to alstro that defensiveness isn't a Scum tell for me, the reached the conclusion that it is person dependent whereas you still think me being defensive is a Scum tell. I'm just trying to tell you here that being defensive isn't AI for me. Make of that what you will but it's true.In post 305, MargotRosa wrote:I don't know that LQ has done much to assuage my earlier suspicions. I feel like people backed down from the scum read mainly on the basis of it being a bit of a pile on, and the fact that once I spelled out what I saw as the difference between scum defensiveness and townie defensiveness it changed.
Not sure lol. I really need to think through it all. GTMH, it's Alstro, but I honestly don't know, because they've been acting pretty Townie recentlyIn post 311, HockeyFan wrote:Who do you think is partners with LQ?
I just think that adds a lot of unnecessary WIFOM into the game. No reason to think the team is exactly T3 and Roden yet.In post 298, StrangeMatter wrote:Just because you lose as scum doesn’t mean you can’t do that kind of stuff again at all, and thinking like that could end up with scum completely getting away with doing said risky play because it IS the play Town wouldn’t expect.In post 292, LicketyQuickety wrote:Why do you think they would play it the exact same way again?In post 285, StrangeMatter wrote:It’s not really a pattern from just one person if you ask me. It’s a pattern between two users from my experience and reading into a scum game where both T3 and Roden were scum.
I won't be able to sit down and form a comprehensive, updated read until I am back from visiting my grandparents today, but for the time being I will say that I don't think it's a good idea to yeet the top poster on D1 unless there is a very compelling case for them being scum, because if they flip town it's a huge blow.In post 324, alstroemerial wrote:For now, I'm going to VOTE: Egix to try to squeeze some more content out. Question for you: Has your read on LQ changed since 111 given that they've been particularly active, and since the whole slip discussion?
In post 325, HockeyFan wrote:Agree but I think thier content has been /towny/ enough.In post 315, LicketyQuickety wrote:I keep feeling like alstro is not really doing much. I feel like they are just posting to post - like they know they have to post something so they do, but none of it is really convincing because of so much hedging language (which is usually a Scum tell).
My reads are pretty similar to 231 except maybe havign strange as a tl, and margot to null
Is anyone able to explain why they Tr Austro (blame phone) in less vague terms than this? As of yet I am unconvinced.In post 327, MargotRosa wrote:My point was more that this was the reason I saw that people backed down from SRing you. My reasoning has been detailed elsewhere, and my point was that you haven't done much to assuage those suspicions. You are far from LS for me, but definitely on my radar.In post 317, LicketyQuickety wrote:If I have your reasoning right for why I am Scum it is because my defensiveness changed after you said I was being defensive? And that just because the wagon developed doesn't mean I am Town? I can still be reasonable sometimes just like I can be defensive sometimes. When I explained to alstro that defensiveness isn't a Scum tell for me, the reached the conclusion that it is person dependent whereas you still think me being defensive is a Scum tell. I'm just trying to tell you here that being defensive isn't AI for me. Make of that what you will but it's true.In post 305, MargotRosa wrote:I don't know that LQ has done much to assuage my earlier suspicions. I feel like people backed down from the scum read mainly on the basis of it being a bit of a pile on, and the fact that once I spelled out what I saw as the difference between scum defensiveness and townie defensiveness it changed.
Not sure lol. I really need to think through it all. GTMH, it's Alstro, but I honestly don't know, because they've been acting pretty Townie recentlyIn post 311, HockeyFan wrote:Who do you think is partners with LQ?
... Nothing outside of gut, but I like them trying to get more information out of me by actually engaging, like, they aren't just making conclusions without follow-up, but I want to see more from them.In post 330, Egix96 wrote:Is anyone able to explain why they Tr Austro (blame phone) in less vague terms than this? As of yet I am unconvinced.
This is still happening btw.In post 308, Clasko wrote:I'll probably rearrange/update my reads list in #267 next time I check in because that post was kinda scattered towards the bottom, there.
I say Roden or you right now is my top two candidates for scum has to be you and the former is honestly better to flip than your slot. Roden elim. To me, getting some information involving the meta (of T3 and Roden) is probably more useful than eliminating you because of what some people here consider a slip.In post 333, Clasko wrote:Also wanna ask SM who their two strongest elimination candidates are rn for D1, and why?
I say two, because one is most likely me which you've hinted the potential reasons for in #279 and iterating that doesn't say much.
Its mainly a meta read: 296. As for Margot Null, im not seeing enough content from them atm, sure their content at the very beginning was townishIn post 326, LicketyQuickety wrote:What are you seeing about Strange that is Townie? Hard for me to get a read there. Why did Margot move to Null?In post 325, HockeyFan wrote:Agree but I think thier content has been /towny/ enough.In post 315, LicketyQuickety wrote:I keep feeling like alstro is not really doing much. I feel like they are just posting to post - like they know they have to post something so they do, but none of it is really convincing because of so much hedging language (which is usually a Scum tell).
My reads are pretty similar to 231 except maybe havign strange as a tl, and margot to null
Idk man, its mainly vibes/tonal. I like 130 and 146 and thier recent content has been towny tooIn post 330, Egix96 wrote:In post 325, HockeyFan wrote:Agree but I think thier content has been /towny/ enough.In post 315, LicketyQuickety wrote:I keep feeling like alstro is not really doing much. I feel like they are just posting to post - like they know they have to post something so they do, but none of it is really convincing because of so much hedging language (which is usually a Scum tell).
My reads are pretty similar to 231 except maybe havign strange as a tl, and margot to nullIs anyone able to explain why they Tr Austro (blame phone) in less vague terms than this? As of yet I am unconvinced.In post 327, MargotRosa wrote:My point was more that this was the reason I saw that people backed down from SRing you. My reasoning has been detailed elsewhere, and my point was that you haven't done much to assuage those suspicions. You are far from LS for me, but definitely on my radar.In post 317, LicketyQuickety wrote:If I have your reasoning right for why I am Scum it is because my defensiveness changed after you said I was being defensive? And that just because the wagon developed doesn't mean I am Town? I can still be reasonable sometimes just like I can be defensive sometimes. When I explained to alstro that defensiveness isn't a Scum tell for me, the reached the conclusion that it is person dependent whereas you still think me being defensive is a Scum tell. I'm just trying to tell you here that being defensive isn't AI for me. Make of that what you will but it's true.In post 305, MargotRosa wrote:I don't know that LQ has done much to assuage my earlier suspicions. I feel like people backed down from the scum read mainly on the basis of it being a bit of a pile on, and the fact that once I spelled out what I saw as the difference between scum defensiveness and townie defensiveness it changed.
Not sure lol. I really need to think through it all. GTMH, it's Alstro, but I honestly don't know, because they've been acting pretty Townie recentlyIn post 311, HockeyFan wrote:Who do you think is partners with LQ?
That's really really bad. Don't lynch for info unless you are doing some sort of calculations for it (which I will be calculating things during NP).In post 339, StrangeMatter wrote:Even if this flips green it means we still have some sort of information, so either way I think this vote is fine.
Another naked vote, bro.
I already did think over this, and I believe that this is just a better person to eliminate just from how they have been doing as having scum-like intent to me.In post 342, LicketyQuickety wrote:That's really really bad. Don't lynch for info unless you are doing some sort of calculations for it (which I will be calculating things during NP).In post 339, StrangeMatter wrote:Even if this flips green it means we still have some sort of information, so either way I think this vote is fine.
How much of your read on Roden is based on the Scum team being exactly T3/Roden? I mean. I could consider that if Roden/T3 flip Scum, but doing pre-flip is generally a bad idea.In post 344, StrangeMatter wrote:I already did think over this, and I believe that this is just a better person to eliminate just from how they have been doing as having scum-like intent to me.In post 342, LicketyQuickety wrote:That's really really bad. Don't lynch for info unless you are doing some sort of calculations for it (which I will be calculating things during NP).In post 339, StrangeMatter wrote:Even if this flips green it means we still have some sort of information, so either way I think this vote is fine.
What happened to Clasko?In post 346, T3 wrote:alstro is PoE.