It’s a contributing factor but not the only one.In post 623, NorwegianboyEE wrote:So because Datisi is not playing exactly the same as 'previous game' they= scum?In post 622, MathBlade wrote:2) You’re not charismatic town leader. So you’re scummy hence in my would elim pool.
I dreamt that people were doing an avatar trend by putting their avatars really far away on landscape photos.In post 621, Datisi wrote:hey, last game i literally dreamed of a reason why math/umlaut are scum partners (at the time when i only knew umlaut was scum) and later on it turned out to be correct, so
1) sorry, let me phrase that better: when you don't bother to elaborate on your gutpings, i can do nothing else but assume you are bullshitting a read and are too lazy to make up reasons for itIn post 622, MathBlade wrote:1) Gut and scumpings are not meaningless.In post 616, Datisi wrote:1) is meaningless on its ownIn post 559, MathBlade wrote:Not really sure that’s necessary but
1) Your posts give me scumpings frequently
2) You’re vastly different than in the prior game
3) Our reads are pretty much polar opposites in most regards (STD is a top town read, even though I disagree with their solve I could see George but not IV I don’t think George and you make sense though and you’re more likely)
Usually I can find a bit where I go “yeah okay”
But your defense of Dwlee is weird
Your play with Faker and IV is weird
I don’t get most of your reads where as you were much more charismatic in the mini normal
2) yeah, this is a vastly different game. how is my apparent difference scummy?
3.1) if our reads are different, why does that make me scum as opposed to town with different thoughts? which of my reads are in bad faith?
3.2) are those not my reads?? i'm townreading std, i can see george scum and i don't think iv is scum? like?
why is my defense of dwlee weird when you literally attacked them for "they said they didn't read the game but they had reads", do you not see how that is an awful take from the outside?
what about my play around faker and iv is weird
why is weird scummy
none of this feels properly founded
2) You’re not charismatic town leader. So you’re scummy hence in my would elim pool.
3.1) Too much in contrast is the problem I have. With a town player I disagree with I at least see something I can agree with
3.2) I don’t remember the exact post but I remember that I wrote that with those thoughts.
I attacked them for lying. Pretty straightforward. You keep repeating the same thing. Do you expect a different answer?
Regarding Faker and IV that’s been covered extensively.
i still have no clue how you're getting here?In post 624, MathBlade wrote:Unless there’s 2 scum in that pool of three scum are in those 6 players
Distributed votes no incentive to bus…
No incentive to bus means scum are voting town.
If scum are voting town they’re not likely being wagoned
In post 555, MathBlade wrote:I get scum pings from this and if I am right not with George.In post 196, Datisi wrote:you know what, sure
i'd be lying if i said i totally see std as town now, as opposed to possibly scum who's tired of The Walls and doesn't wanna contribute much there, but my primary reason to wanting to kill him has kinda gone down now, that is you convinced me that my gut reaction probably wasn't valid
VOTE: georgebailey
pedit: i find faker slightly scummy for the "it's important for me to understand dats/iv, but it's difficult", followed by zero attempts to understand. but i'm not sure if voting him is gonna produce much right now? like, my current objective is to make all slots at least have something readable, and i wanna see how he responds first, so
For starters hereIn post 557, MathBlade wrote:Ugh if I missed Sloth I am gonna be hella sads.In post 382, Faker wrote:If you ever played on DLP then maybe? You don't remind me of anyone from there, though, and that was a long, LONG time ago.
That being said if Faker is sloth scum vibes.
I agree with my prior slot’s take that Datisi / Faker has a scum in it.
VOTE: Datisi
More likely of the two.
the "why do you townread me for my unwnd read when i had a similar read on georgebailey when i was scum" arc, mostly. i'm thinking you bringing that up, knowing that it's likely to kill a reason of why i was townreading you, you had genuine intentions of trying to figure out if i was lying about my reasoning and that you didn't care if you destroyed my townread of you in the process.In post 630, innocentvillager wrote:Datisi can you explain why you townread me please?
I would expect consolidation. There’s no fear or panic here so scum are happy with the position the game is in.In post 628, Datisi wrote:i still have no clue how you're getting here?In post 624, MathBlade wrote:Unless there’s 2 scum in that pool of three scum are in those 6 players
Distributed votes no incentive to bus…
No incentive to bus means scum are voting town.
If scum are voting town they’re not likely being wagoned
like, how do you get to "if scum are voting town, they're likely not being wagoned" do you expect scum to bus with just 2 votes on them?
In post 604, T3 wrote:
I think they do pretty well along with my prior ISO.In post 631, Datisi wrote:math, i really really don't care it was covered by other people. i'm asking for *your* thoughts. neither of those quotes actually explain why you thought my handling of the situation was weird, let alone scummy.
Time is limited lmaoIn post 635, MathBlade wrote:I think they do pretty well along with my prior ISO.In post 631, Datisi wrote:math, i really really don't care it was covered by other people. i'm asking for *your* thoughts. neither of those quotes actually explain why you thought my handling of the situation was weird, let alone scummy.
I see no point in arguing down that path with you when my path is limited and I would rather focus on the wagon dynamics that “I don’t get it” when it’s really freaking simple and I go step by step.
Like c’mon dude
I am not looking to win favors. I am looking to elim scum.In post 637, Datisi wrote:you don't have to explain it right away, we have 3 days. but i want to see actual your thoughts because hiding behind "others explained it better" isn't gonna win you any favours. and i can't discuss the wagon things now anyway since i'm obviously briandead for the wagon stuff and i wanna try to figure it out but i'm in a call rn so
marci said herself she has troubles finding votes as scum. and besides, while half the day has gone by, there's not a lot of actual content out there, and most of these wagons are there because of very flimsy reasoning. there's very little pressure for any of these. so i'm wary about any analysis done on wagons that don't feel serious. it feels like half the votes here could be changed pretty easily, which imo feels like it lowers the certainty of any analysis. and like, even with your analysis, it's perfectly likely that one of them is scum.In post 638, MathBlade wrote:Like assume IV is scum >> then Norway and George prob town and innocent votes vanity because ….?
Assume Marci is scum >> Marci doesn’t vote anyone because …
Assume George is scum >> Makes IV almost certainly town, this makes Norway town for scum rarely double park town. So then Marci + George is possible but not very probable as Marci and George aren’t doing anything to stoke flames or division.
So I don’t see a way 2/3rss of IV/Marci/George are scum which means at most one is which means your wagons suck go vote a second choice or something.
i'm expecting quotes/links to this statement when you can. because neither of the quotes you pulled up in 629 actually explain anything.In post 635, MathBlade wrote:I think they do pretty well along with my prior ISO.
In post 598, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I’m not letting up the possibility that Mathblade is scum, because Mathblade always reps into scum slots.
i feel like its a bit unfair on mathblade here,In post 612, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I said it is an trend that when you replace into games you are typically scum.
At no point does that mention that you are scum because you are good at scum.
if ur town why would u have this nightmare sisIn post 618, Datisi wrote:i had a nightmare i was scum in this game and my partner got to y-1, and i had a great idea how to get the pressure off of them and onto a townieIn post 574, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Had an nightmare today about failing my job interview, then almost dying after getting shot in an car by armed hijackers, destroying my own laptop because "they can’t have it" but also feeling sad about it, then waking up into my room but it’s filled with bees and mosquitos. But then ACTUALLY waking up.
Lovely.
but then n_m repped into a town slot and instantly hammered them and we lost
sure...In post 640, Dwlee99 wrote:Marci doesn't vote anyone because she is having trouble entering the game and finding a townie to fake a reason to vote
is my lack of vote and my want to buddy u the only reasons u have to sus me or?In post 646, Dwlee99 wrote:I have it on good authority that struggling to place your vote is +scum. If you're town probably M&M
good authority as in marci’s own self evaluation of her play?In post 646, Dwlee99 wrote:I have it on good authority that struggling to place your vote is +scum. If you're town probably M&M
but maybe that’s what scum!me wants you to think?In post 632, Datisi wrote:the "why do you townread me for my unwnd read when i had a similar read on georgebailey when i was scum" arc, mostly. i'm thinking you bringing that up, knowing that it's likely to kill a reason of why i was townreading you, you had genuine intentions of trying to figure out if i was lying about my reasoning and that you didn't care if you destroyed my townread of you in the process.In post 630, innocentvillager wrote:Datisi can you explain why you townread me please?
this isn't *super* solid, but i know you become an easier read as the game goes on, so i'm not gonna sweat about it too much rn