If you were my brain I'd be wanting more than a few words with you. Why do you think I should vote you?In post 1991, the worst wrote:i did indeed see those, i just kept reading (didn't register that you actually wanted a response to #2)
1) idk I'm not your brain!! i was asking you!!!!!
2) more interested in manatee doing a read on you than I am in answering this
-- Or here if you just wanna see fae/faer used in context.
Where in that post do I say the main replacing the hydra is scummy?In post 1997, Gamma Emerald wrote:I feel like when scum hydrae replace out typically all the heads fall at onceIn post 1977, Flea The Magician wrote:Well it appears MM is at least able to extract some information.In post 1832, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:I thought faer hop onto Gamma was awkward
I feel like fae would've mentioned something about voting the same person as faer top scumread for most of the day (Auro)
General dissatisfaction with the leading wagons
The replace out of the hydra to a single player while still suspicious does confirm that Xtomx is really not feeling the game. My interactions with auro were good enough that I could bump them to a neutral read. Given also that end of phase is approaching it was time to begin consolidating and not riding what was essentially a vanity wagon with me being the sole participant.
damned if you, damned if you dont I guess.
It’s probably NAI that Auro remained in but I think on a base theoretical level your idea of the main replacing the hydra being scummy is flawed.
-- Or here if you just wanna see fae/faer used in context. Yes, you can, but in the same post you prove my pointIn post 1998, Gamma Emerald wrote:ex-fucking-scuse me I can obvtown tooIn post 1985, Flea The Magician wrote:Oh and as for WWSF do, scum flea would absolutely vote enchant for that wagon.
Enchant either goes super townie and becomes untouchable, or super scummy.
Gamma can be raged or made apathetic and made to appear scummy.
-- Or here if you just wanna see fae/faer used in context.
The latter. SorryIn post 1926, Thor Ragnarok wrote:Something_Smart, can you clear up whether you agree with my theories or were making fun out of them? My opinion on you heavily depends on it.
Not sure I agree that Thor was intending to beIn post 1943, the worst wrote:I don't think he expected to be epically called out. I don't know why he's faking this or what he expects to gain, but it's pretty damn clear he's talkin shit.
Manatee? It's been more than a day, will you be doing those ISOs soon?In post 1554, ManateeGal wrote:hqrahajabajjsnakskzksns i do not know why i am strugglinh to play this game mental blocks r the worstim gonna try to do isos tmrw so if theres anyone specific people r curious abt my thoughts on do lmk
So this is a joke? Will you be voting anyone?In post 1638, Enchant wrote:I am tempting to suggest no-elim and let give PR time to work.
... Joke. I just suggested it, statistic say we elim townie 1d most likely, so why not?
{Gamma, Enchant, Manatee} all seem like fine lims to me. You explained that Gamma's lack of survivalism made him seem at least meh-towny, but can you explain your dissatisfaction with the other two?In post 1832, Cat Scratch Fever wrote: General dissatisfaction with the leading wagons
I think that that seems like such a backwards way of looking at my play that I'm equally as convinced that you're just looking for some kind of reaction here as I am that you actually think it. Maybe more convinced of the former.In post 2008, Auro wrote:Any thoughts on that?
Whoops, apologies. This is a retraction of that point. Reading back, I also missed those in my first read of the game .>.Miss Midnight wrote:Also, literally on the page that you link to of my "only" engagement with Gamma, directly above the post you linked is an entire series of interactions between me and Gamma...?
Lightly, sure. I've already talked about my thoughts on her wagon and have indicated that I think that it's a pretty bad one.In post 2014, Auro wrote:While you're here: do you still townread Manatee?
If so, are you okay with her wagon right now? Why not push elsewhere?
If you're going to drive a great truck through the thread, you might as well drop trou and tell all.In post 1930, Thor Ragnarok wrote:Actually, is it not very likely that scum already knows which setup it is, unless they have no power roles at all? I'm willing to take that chance and will throw this out here for more transparent discussion:
We're in the left-side setup
In post 2017, House wrote:If you're going to drive a bread* truck through the thread, you might as well drop trou and tell all.In post 1930, Thor Ragnarok wrote:Actually, is it not very likely that scum already knows which setup it is, unless they have no power roles at all? I'm willing to take that chance and will throw this out here for more transparent discussion:
We're in the left-side setup
Yes, it did seem (defensive or neutral), did it lead to a read on Penguin? I'd love to hear.In post 2015, Miss Midnight wrote:Sorry, that wasn't a "would you say it's X or would you say it's Y?", it was a "would you say it's any one of (X or Y)?"
Uh, I obtain hopefully convincing people. I obtain other people's perspective on my thoughts, which help inform my own. It demonstrates to the thread at large that I'm playing the game instead of just thinking things but never making them known. .
There's also a really tiny chance Thor is playing a certain 200IQ move with that entire line of posting.In post 2018, House wrote:In post 2017, House wrote:If you're going to drive a bread* truck through the thread, you might as well drop trou and tell all.In post 1930, Thor Ragnarok wrote:Actually, is it not very likely that scum already knows which setup it is, unless they have no power roles at all? I'm willing to take that chance and will throw this out here for more transparent discussion:
We're in the left-side setup
Yeah, I don't really care to go through my own ISO to pick out examples. If you'd like to pick out some specifics then you can and we can talk about them, but so far the only one you've brought up you immediately retracted.In post 2019, Auro wrote:Yes, it did seem (defensive or neutral), did it lead to a read on Penguin? I'd love to hear.In post 2015, Miss Midnight wrote:Sorry, that wasn't a "would you say it's X or would you say it's Y?", it was a "would you say it's any one of (X or Y)?"
Uh, I obtain hopefully convincing people. I obtain other people's perspective on my thoughts, which help inform my own. It demonstrates to the thread at large that I'm playing the game instead of just thinking things but never making them known. .
Sure, can you offer me more reads that were affected by your engagements? I know the theory reasons for engagement, my complaint is that the aggression seems lacking - that you're demonstrating that you're around, but playing it safe.
