@
I had an early ping from
ssbm
, re 1652: I had an early ping from
Datisi
but not sure if I was seeing things right or it's scum indicative for him.In post 333, Datisi wrote:yesIn post 298, T3 wrote:This post is reading way too deep into stuff
almost as if it was made halfway through page 1 of the game
what's the point of this comment
because i am aware that the "deep analysis" i make on page 1 about 2 posts is going to be meaningless soon. it's already meaningless now, i don't even remember what bullshit i said there. it's meant to get discussion going, but you can bet that once we're past the initial rvs stage, i'm not gonna be basing almost any of my read on mew on the analysis i made in 17.In post 312, Salsabil Faria wrote:If the vote didn’t mean anything, they why did you voteIn post 286, Datisi wrote: i dislike salsa's 253. not always coming from scum (and there has been some stuff from salsa later on i liked) but the "you are scumreading both me and this person that i voted once in very early game?? in what universe can we possibly be scum together?!?" as if that vote actually meant anything or is any kind of anti-partner indicative lolMewor a deep analysis of the vote? And later, you mostly probably said you were liking their reasoning behind it. So, you're reading them based on something thatactually meant nothing[/b] according to you?
MRlater said, it’s not SvS which I read that post later. I was surprised to see that she put both of us in the scum list which indicates scum!me and scum!Mewstarted the game by theatring which is ridiculous.
later on, i said i liked his response. that's got nothing to do with his votes in the game, i thought his responses to my analysis and other people voting him were townie enough.
stop twisting my words. i didn't say that nothing mattered there, i said that your vote on mew will soon hold no significance whatsoever, or arguably already doesn't hold any significance whatsoever considering you're not even voting him anymore. so saying "me and mew cannot be scum because i voted him early game" is wrong and maybe purposefully ignorant. after thinking for 10 seconds, i can show you at least 2 games where scum entered the game theatering, probably more if i put any more brain into it.
and considering you're far from a newbie now, i'd expect you to know that scum very much can enter the game with throwaway votes on each other. so the fact that you're pretending that you voting mew somehow clears you from being partners is ridiculous, if not outright scummy.
If I try to see this from scum!
Datisi
perspective, then it could be this: I caught him with contradiction where he had to bring up the scum theatre
notion to dismiss the argument (or to shut down me) by using aggressive tone. Then later, he posted this when I called him out of being unnecessary rude: In post 349, Datisi wrote:i wasn't trying to be rude towards you, i saw you (either purposefully or accidentally) misrepping me and i'm gonna react accordingly to that. i guess excuse me for not assuming good faith from a person i am suspicious of, in a game of mafia, where i know there are people that will not have good faith towards me?
the "i'm not that confident in doing theatre early so i wouldn't do it" seems like a maybe townie thing to say, unless salsa is pretty ballsy scum, and she doesn't strike me as such?
where scum!he can push me later with this
But not sure, if this really happened the way I'm describing or I'm just stretching here.
theatring
business, means holding an option for later.But not sure, if this really happened the way I'm describing or I'm just stretching here.
~ 
