In post 1813, MargotRosa wrote: In post 1810, Datisi wrote:
mmm, i'm also gonna need elaboration on this. iirc, you still haven't shown the datisi/salsa connection you saw (link me if you have), and why do you think i don't fit with anyone else?
Yes I have! What is your actual problem dude? I have said, already, that I felt like anyone partnered with you needs to be scum reading you. I've been clear on that, and given that you've apparently spent soooooo much time rereading the thread, you'd surely have found it in the ISO
where the fuck did you do that? you first mentioned that team in
1563, with no elaboration whatsoever. to then go "nvm" 5 minutes later. you even said later yourself (
1716) that that was the first time you seriously thought of that team. when i ask "why were you thinking of that team?", i'm asking why you're thinking of it way back then when you first mentioned it. because if you first thought of it back on d3, there is no way that d4's events were actually influencing that read. so what was it?
furthermore, even if we say that i'm only talking about your d4 reads here and not d3, you said that anyone partnered with me has to be scumreading me. okay, fine! but you know who's showed that they're scumreading me today? both salsa and ari! so what i'm asking is why the fuck do you think that i'm not partnered with ari? you gave no explanation for why i'm suddenly not a viable ari partner, despite your "datisi's partner would've been scumreading him" read implying you shouldn't be thinking that. fuck me for asking you to elaborate on your vague unexplained thoughts?
In post 1813, MargotRosa wrote:This whole "where's the evidence" thing you're doing is unbelievably frustrating, because at this point, there is none. I think that's very clear. But there's none for anybody. If there was, the votes would be stacked up to go already. Noone is sure, because all the clear scumreads are already dead.
i don't ask for evidence. i *understand* there is no evidence for anything. i'm asking for evidence of your fucking thought process. to prove to me not what you're saying is true, but that you genuinely believe in what you're saying and how you got there. i don't give a shit about half-baked unexplained reads, i can't use them to solve anyone. i need a thought process that nobody is willing to give.
In post 1813, MargotRosa wrote:Honestly, sick of this. You are so intransigent and frustrating. Even if this is just a policy vote, it's a policy vote well earned by your slot. I'm trying to read slots, and you're fucking around with these flailing desperate attempts to beg people to provide evidence you know nobody has, and being cruel and hostile to everyone els let in the thread.
policy vote, what for, for playing the game? what, you figured out you can't say anything good about kyouko's case other than "hurr durr it's logical" so you attack and vote me based on policy?
i thought your posts after salsa's recent posting were scummy, because it felt like you were being purposefully ignorant of what she was saying when it was obvious she wasn't gonna properly defend herself which would let you push her. i was gonna wait for you to do the thing you love so much which is use facts and logic on kyouko's case on me. but no, you're just gonna throw a fit after me being annoyed for you talking about a salsa/datisi team since d3 and refusing to say why you were thinking of that team. fine.
VOTE: margotrosa
i'm vt. vote me out, vote salsa out tomorrow, lose the fucking game. i don't give a shit right now. partner is chaos/ari, slightly more likely to be chaos but i'm not gonna pretend like i know.
~ 
![:]](./images/smilies/icon_smiling.png "Cheerful Smile"){kind=icon}
