Oh. This shouldn't be that hard. Pooky could quote some games himself but because he's oppositional scum I don't think he would.In post 7773, SirCakez wrote:yeah I was looking for a specific example where Pooky was scum and totally snowed someone
Tuned out tbh. Everytime I go to read, my eyes glaze over.In post 7757, SirCakez wrote:Titus where you at right now?
lmao I forgot about this when Alisae claimed Masons with scum PookyIn post 7775, Milobird wrote:Oh. This shouldn't be that hard. Pooky could quote some games himself but because he's oppositional scum I don't think he would.In post 7773, SirCakez wrote:yeah I was looking for a specific example where Pooky was scum and totally snowed someone
I think an example would be how Pooky approached Alisae in smoke filled chambers.
-Bell
Could you explain what you're referring to?In post 7782, SirCakez wrote:what if all the evidence pointed to one person instead of having a mountain of evidence implicating both people
that would be nice
I'm not I'm just thinking out loudIn post 7783, Milobird wrote:Could you explain what you're referring to?In post 7782, SirCakez wrote:what if all the evidence pointed to one person instead of having a mountain of evidence implicating both people
that would be nice
If you're expecting a clear answer.
Just go with what Notty said.
I'm simply making an argument of capacity.
-Bell
In post 7787, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Bells argument is one sided my design
he is arguing that scum me is pocketing town you
he is ignoring that town me would also want to pocket town you.
-BellIn post 7769, Milobird wrote:It's true, you tend to use them interchangeably.
But I actually don't know what point you're trying to make here.
You are well known for pocketing and buddying other players.
As either alignment really. You can be pretty friendly when you want to be.
You have a title that I think was meant to communicate that supportiveness. But also how you use that as scum to win people over.
-Bell
In post 7774, Milobird wrote:You mean people you've fooled as scum?
Oh, yeah I misworded myself there.
I meant that pocketing is part of your vocabulary to the point that you have your own term of endearment for it. It was kind of muddled there with sort of a paranoia argument, but that one I think isn't really true and was more a lapse of brain cells on my part tbh.
-Bell
Actually you said you would be trying to pocket him as either alignment, so by your own point you've tried to pocket him as either alignment.In post 7790, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:you keep spamming that I have SirCakes pocketed over and over and over again
this is factually untrue
if he was pocketed he would have already voted you.
you are trying to instill fear in him of scum!me