with 9 votes in play, it takes 5 to make a decision. day 1 ends in (expired on 2022-01-17 00:15:00).
Last edited by Datisi on Thu Dec 30, 2021 10:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I will straight up disregard all reason if you have a PR dream again. You can come back and be like, “I dreamt that Locke is a N2 Bulletproof Multitasking Cop and Self-Targeting Doctor,” and I will go, “Okay, Locke kill it is then.”
In post 24, MBot wrote:Haha Looker. Nice one. Hopefully not a lot of subs this game. Getting a coalition locked in will give us a step in the right direction for POE.
Hi, just got home after a five-hour flight and not in the mood to start thinking about Mafia yet, just posting so you know I'm here.
“There are two kinds of people in this world: those who say, ‘There are two kinds of people in this world: those who say there are two kinds of people in this world,
i think scum would be more explicit in why theyre voting for me, because it's difficult for them to gauge how plausible an accusation looks to people without their knowledge. to town, if it's self-evident why a post is scummy, you dont really feel the need to explain that, you know it's obvious to town because it was obvious to you! scum dont get a genuine unfiltered town-equivalent "obvious to them".
that's my five btw, esther/galron/andante/looker/enchant.
I didn't realize there was such a rush to lock in a coalition without any data to make my choices. I'm always stiff it's NAI. Galron has been trigger happy from first post of the game
In post 29, Umlaut wrote:Hi, just got home after a five-hour flight and not in the mood to start thinking about Mafia yet, just posting so you know I'm here.
yes, it is kinda forced ("fake"? eh). im trying to hard read enchant off these early game posts because, we might not really get that much else. enchant's vote clearly isnt rvs though.
HURT: mc esther sorry, ma'am, we don't do fakes at my table HEAL: looker I'll keep your seat warm, though. I think we should do the regular voting for context, we have the time; however, I've never studied the benefits of inconsequential voting. It'll probably be more telling as we get closer to deadline.
Happy New Year and all that - I'll get more serious after the holidays
In post 37, mc esther wrote:yes, it is kinda forced ("fake"? eh). im trying to hard read enchant off these early game posts because, we might not really get that much else. enchant's vote clearly isnt rvs though.
true, true.
tbh almost all of your posts feel like you're drawing water from a stone
im gonna start voting when i see heals piling up on someone i, uh -- my phrasing's awkward here but im trying to be specific --, disbelieve to be town (or if we're converging on a a five-person coalition i agree with, i'll vote for the member im least sure of)
In post 32, MBot wrote:I didn't realize there was such a rush to lock in a coalition without any data to make my choices. I'm always stiff it's NAI. Galron has been trigger happy from first post of the game
now that the holidays are over, i am sending all players a general reminder that this game exists. it will not count as a prod for anyone.
I will straight up disregard all reason if you have a PR dream again. You can come back and be like, “I dreamt that Locke is a N2 Bulletproof Multitasking Cop and Self-Targeting Doctor,” and I will go, “Okay, Locke kill it is then.”
I saw what others saw with Esther''s seemingly "forced" tone/style, but their immediately copping to it being forced with zero self-consciousness makes that a lot better for me. Take it away and what's left is some good, fairly thoughtful early reads.
“There are two kinds of people in this world: those who say, ‘There are two kinds of people in this world: those who say there are two kinds of people in this world,
looker, you self-healed ostensibly to preserve your exactly four slots, why is four so significant to you? and why was self-healing not something you considered worthwhile in your first post, but then something that you preferred to healing literally anyone else (e.g., t3)?
In post 47, mc esther wrote:looker, you self-healed ostensibly to preserve your exactly four slots, why is four so significant to you? and why was self-healing not something you considered worthwhile in your first post, but then something that you preferred to healing literally anyone else (e.g., t3)?
I don't want to make the mistake of healing a full coalition, but I also don't want to forget to make a coalition. Being one off allows me to procrastinate without having to do too much work all at once. Still confident in my ProHawk, vote, though; I don't think he should sit with anyone in the cafeteria.