that is true.In post 547, VP Baltar wrote:I would say you have a reputation as being good town and would not be an easy misyeet
was that actually said in this game prior to 131? because if not, i do have to wonder how val knows that...
that is true.In post 547, VP Baltar wrote:I would say you have a reputation as being good town and would not be an easy misyeet
idk i just felt the ben shapiro approach coming back and it feels exhausting to try to even make a point against you when i know you're just gonna argue about some inane thing that wasn't even related. ive also maybe lost confidence lately bc my reads have been wrong a lot idkIn post 547, VP Baltar wrote:Lol what? Since when are you weak and don't push things? You have helped run me up multiple times in games before. People like you more than me typically because you effort more than I do. This is detached from reality, and I'm not sure why you're acting like a victim when you're the one making weak ass arguments against me and I'm just pointing out why I think your whole approach is flawed. I don't even think you're scum here, so it's not like I'm arguing for your head.
If he's "logic-based", what do you make of 541, which shows his logic to be faulty in multiple regards?In post 549, fireisredsir wrote:ok moving on
read luke's val case and it's... not super convincing to me. he does tend to focus very strongly in one area as both alignments (also side note but this guy like always rolls maf based on past games lol, at least there's a lot to look at). i think he's also generally p logic-based and wouldn't really want to make as bad of a point as he did about kovu if he didn't genuinely believe it was true
maybe thats terrible reasoning, idk, not saying he's town but more that i don't think the things he's done are super AI for him to me. idk. not feeling very strongly either way here and ok to see where the wagon goes
I'm not fully sold Bell isn't scum here, but willing to give him some rope given the claim. And who knows, maybe I'll invictus him!In post 545, Datisi wrote:love the metaphor though i am interested in how it follows through on who's scum and who's not, in your opinionIn post 537, VP Baltar wrote:Oh hey now I'm catching votes with no legitimate reasoning. Told yall I kicked the hornets nest.
Maybe I'm reading between the lines when I shouldn't be. That's what I took away from Val's original post on itIn post 550, Datisi wrote:that is true.In post 547, VP Baltar wrote:I would say you have a reputation as being good town and would not be an easy misyeet
was that actually said in this game prior to 131? because if not, i do have to wonder how val knows that...
honestly this is enough! i just thought it was weird that you didn't even acknowledge it and made it out like my vote was due to other reasonsIn post 548, VP Baltar wrote:Because it's insane tinfoil. What do you want me to say to it?In post 546, fireisredsir wrote:i made a post. explaining why you had scum motivation to start picking fights with people right after bell said you were in your scum meta for collaborating inoffensively. you ignored all of that
It's not what happened, but you can keep building fantasy land out of popsicle sticks over there. I won't stop you.
i mean that was kinda my point. he's logic-based as both alignments in the sense that he thinks that he is being rational and logical but isn't necessarily correct all of the time. id have to read past games more thoroughly than i have time for rn to see if he is more often logically faulty as maf than as town, but that wasn't really the impression i got from a brief skimIn post 553, gorilla wrote: If he's "logic-based", what do you make of 541, which shows his logic to be faulty in multiple regards?
this is interesting bc i didn't read like super thoroughly but it wasn't really the impression i got. do you remember if you've played with him as scum or town or both?In post 561, Fey wrote:r.e. Val I'm unsure if he's scum just based off of having played with him as it previously, I feel like he cast a wide net and was like, all over the place covering every base with what he said where here he feels narrowed down. It's limiting and isolating how he's playing, idk.
Cool. When are we going to see good town!datisi, then?In post 550, Datisi wrote:that is true.In post 547, VP Baltar wrote:I would say you have a reputation as being good town and would not be an easy misyeet
you didn't. town if i had to make a call, but literally no reasoning other than "idk lol gut".In post 554, VP Baltar wrote:On a separate note, did I get your read on gorilla already?
now that you've outed - this was my reasoning for suspecting fey. i figured it was ydrasse but her questioning of me felt very boring an unexcited. which is very much not how excited-town!ydrasse plays and instead feels like she's trying to appear solvy in a game she does not want to be playing.In post 568, Fey wrote:To save the posts for you of asking/questioning, etc, I'm Ydrasse.
I wouldn't have asked you to out. Was more just curious about your experience level, but thanksIn post 568, Fey wrote:To save the posts for you of asking/questioning, etc, I'm Ydrasse.
Funny, I had Fey in my notes as either town or deepwolf.In post 571, Datisi wrote:now that you've outed - this was my reasoning for suspecting fey. i figured it was ydrasse but her questioning of me felt very boring an unexcited. which is very much not how excited-town!ydrasse plays and instead feels like she's trying to appear solvy in a game she does not want to be playing.In post 568, Fey wrote:To save the posts for you of asking/questioning, etc, I'm Ydrasse.
You literally played in this game with me.In post 571, Datisi wrote:now that you've outed - this was my reasoning for suspecting fey. i figured it was ydrasse but her questioning of me felt very boring an unexcited. which is very much not how excited-town!ydrasse plays and instead feels like she's trying to appear solvy in a game she does not want to be playing.In post 568, Fey wrote:To save the posts for you of asking/questioning, etc, I'm Ydrasse.