I didn't have an issue with your vote because "trying to find a reason to vote Beat" makes sense as scum-indicative behavior, even if I disagree with the observation the reasoning feels valid. It's not the same as "trying to replicate town meta" because that argument could be applied to virtually anything does, and Cakez claimed her posts were over the top when I didn't think that was true either.In post 222, skitter30 wrote:@gl i guess when i read 157 and 158 the emphasis seems to be more on defending isis than questioning the votes on her, if that makes sense
Also did you have a problem with my vote on her?
I mean i had voted her prior to this and she didnt react to that at all and instead just threw a vague townread on me which is ? to meIn post 207, GuiltyLion wrote:Isis, meh 144 felt like it was just giving a random read rather than meant to push the game any sort of which way from it so I care less about it.
tbh I didn't connect that Isis' townread on you was potentially in response to you voting her, imo it doesn't make a big difference but in the interest of no longer defending Isis too much I'll let her speak to that