In post 691, RH9 wrote:Meuh, who do you want eliminated the most from SGB?
Deliberately not answering this yet but will give input later. I still think being too clear on it means that the mafia in SGB can play in a specific way that takes into account. I want content from you 3 that isn't tempered by my own stance on the matter.
Plus I'll be around until the end of the game either way so there's no rush
In post 690, Faker wrote:Dragons really did not enjoy a previous 3 way with me, and there's a good chance he never wants to touch any minigame with me.
i've already said i'm over this, please stop pushing this narrative
In post 685, RH9 wrote:I think that since Pooky flipped, it's likely that scum!Pooky with his expertise and experience, made a plan and convinced marci and Dwlee to follow along.
It's likely that Dwlee had intentionally joined marci so that Town, not expecting two scum to engage in such a risky behaviour, would view this as unaligned. I also think that Pooky engineered his interactions with both so that when Sillyposting flipped (as is the norm), whoever the Town are in SGB would be convinced that Dwlee was Town.
I think that swapping marci was always the plan but when it came out that they needed to swap marci into MD, the scum decided to leave you with her, because I had already suggested my belief that marci and Dwlee was aligned and "possibly even scum together".
Only someone who hasn't played with scum Pooky would think he tells his teammates what to do or makes overarching plans
actually i had this exact thought yesterday but i didn't broadcast it
that pooky and dwlee might have decided to do these things in the scum thread (targeting marci and pooky praising dwlee for it).
i think it's possible now it's a S/S interaction so all my points so far are probably NAI. i really thought that pooky wouldn't praise dwlee as town if they were scum but now i think it could be a bit of theatre.
i also worry that marcistar is LHF and it's faker but i don't have anything concrete on that yet. let me see if i can come up with something, it was just a vibe about a post faker made
In post 680, Faker wrote:My point here with the above two posts isn't that marcistar needs to or should listen to me. From her point of view I'm scum and obviously shouldn't.
She was willing to go toe-to-toe with me when it was tonal blitzing, but when it comes to substantive holes or inconsistencies, she's nervous. What I just pointed out isn't a big deal at all and honestly isn't even that scum indicative. I think her discomfort in the engagements show a lot more.
I gave this time to let it become apparent: The nail in the coffin imo is the complete lack of care about being on the verge of defeat. Town has lost one minigame, and there's neither indignant fire or flailing despair. She's frozen but knows the game isn't over if she gets voted out, and that there exists a safety net of another partner in a scumsided game to pull the win out if she fails.
i think it was this one, it looks a bit performative
i'll try to see if i can come up with some questions for marcistar and faker soon
In post 707, Save The Dragons wrote:if faker is scum her engagement of pooky had to have been theatre as well. which is a hard pill to swallow. so maybe it is marci.
This is incongruent with you casting my interactions with Pooky as theater
In post 690, Faker wrote:Dragons really did not enjoy a previous 3 way with me, and there's a good chance he never wants to touch any minigame with me.
i've already said i'm over this, please stop pushing this narrative
No. It's relevant and not even remotely insulting to you as either a person or a player. This point is not even asserting something about your skill or mine. I think you have reason to make this swap, if you didn't then OK.
It was extremely performative almost by definition. I have not even remotely been trying to hide it; the entire sequence of my interaction with marcistar has openly been in bad faith.
What do you think of the substantive point inside the post?
In post 707, Save The Dragons wrote:if faker is scum her engagement of pooky had to have been theatre as well. which is a hard pill to swallow. so maybe it is marci.
Not really clear on this; you saw the lengths me/IV went to in ours.
In post 691, RH9 wrote:Meuh, who do you want eliminated the most from SGB?
Same goes for Faker and marci.
I want to see your reads because it could potentially impact my decision if we are to resolve SGB after MD.
My preference at the immediate moment is Dragons->RH9->Dwlee99. I am a very long way from deciding.
None of the above is really a factor in why I'd choose Dragons, maybe quote 3. I had it as a coinflip but the Dwlee99 point that you likely haven't seen Pooky in a scum PT (ie. this game) is a good one and my hangup with Dragons is 682. He's seen that my style of play as scum is in the same vein as clubbing baby seals or choking all life from people and until I said this he didn't really seem worried about it happening again. Yes not everything revolves around me, etc.
In post 709, Faker wrote:No. It's relevant and not even remotely insulting to you as either a person or a player. This point is not even asserting something about your skill or mine. I think you have reason to make this swap, if you didn't then OK.
In post 485, RH9 wrote:By the way, what does everybody think of a Pooky-marci-Dwlee team?
I'm leaning there right now.
Why was Pooky in here?
From my PoE.
I TRed Luke and Penguin, leaving behind him.
To be honest, I actually had Penguin in the PoE originally.
However, I would admit that one reason I moved him to a TR was mainly because I trusted Luke's read on Pooky.
As for my TR on Luke, it was that switch from jovial to serious. I know Luke's scumgame and he's not the sort to suddenly change from jovial to serious in one phase.
This doesn't even sound like you believe the second sentence
how??? ur just making shit up at this point tbhs
this game is so boring with faker being so obviously scum
i honestly dont get what rh9 is going on about rn, whats the use on commenting on dead ppl when u can instead use that energy and focus it into reading the people in ur minigame?
In post 719, marcistar wrote:
this game is so boring with faker being so obviously scum
i honestly dont get what rh9 is going on about rn, whats the use on commenting on dead ppl when u can instead use that energy and focus it into reading the people in ur minigame?
Firstly, Faker isn't exactly obvscum because the rest of us lack the extra insight that you have. We only know that between you and her, there's one moderator and one hacker.
Secondly, my comments were in response to Faker's posts. Not only that, these rereads are good help for my reads on my minigame. It helps me develop my reads.
@Marci except if I'm tunneled on you it would be a way easier game for me as scum and I don't think you'd be able to convince the third to vote me out, so it still doesn't make sense if I'm scum to swap you out
In post 720, RH9 wrote:Firstly, Faker isn't exactly obvscum because the rest of us lack the extra insight that you have. We only know that between you and her, there's one moderator and one hacker.
fakers obv scum to me, and thats what makes it boring, when i already know part of the answer >.<
isnt she obviously buddying u? i feel like its v obv to me that thats what shes been doing.
In post 720, RH9 wrote:Secondly, my comments were in response to Faker's posts. Not only that, these rereads are good help for my reads on my minigame. It helps me develop my reads.
i dont see you trying to tie it back to any surviving players.
In post 722, Dwlee99 wrote:@Marci except if I'm tunneled on you it would be a way easier game for me as scum and I don't think you'd be able to convince the third to vote me out, so it still doesn't make sense if I'm scum to swap you out
??
do you think im not a good player thats kinda true but whenever i feel strongly on a read ill deadass go ham for it so i think that might be a bit scary for scum!u
esp if u already knew u would be so absent from thread.