Mini Normal 2277 - Frog Images (Game Over)
-
-
Klick
-
-
Klick Flash Forward
- Flash Forward
- Flash Forward
- Posts: 12932
- Joined: September 1, 2012
This is one VC but it's the fifth one in a row with 5+ votes on Galron and no other wagon with 3+ votes.In post 500, Ausuka wrote:
With 13 players alive, it takes 7 to decide an elimination. Deadline is in (expired on 2022-08-06 01:33:48).
redcardinal unvotes and lightly pressures MalaIn post 509, redcardinal wrote:I want mala's fresh scumreads before you die
redcardinal sees a chance to kill the Galron wagon momentum, votes Mala (a reasonable choice to go for a miselim probably? No one but Gamma seems to townread Mala at this point)
This then goes nowhere
and redcardinal makes sure to get her vote back on Galron before the wagon gets hammered.In post 650, Ausuka wrote:
With 13 players alive, it takes 7 to decide an elimination. Deadline is in (expired on 2022-08-06 01:33:48).
-
-
Klick Flash Forward
- Flash Forward
- Flash Forward
- Posts: 12932
- Joined: September 1, 2012
-
-
Klick Flash Forward
- Flash Forward
- Flash Forward
- Posts: 12932
- Joined: September 1, 2012
-
-
Klick Flash Forward
- Flash Forward
- Flash Forward
- Posts: 12932
- Joined: September 1, 2012
-
-
T3 He/himSurvivorHe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11458
- Joined: February 19, 2021
- Pronoun: He/him
- Location: Boston
KT not offering any content today other than this and defending himselfIn post 1462, Enchant wrote:Why?
Sheeping, autocorrect.In post 1463, Seanzie wrote:
What does "sheeting" mean?In post 1461, T3 wrote:What doesn’t sit right is KT sheeting redcardinal-
-
Enchant Hannibal Lecter
- Hannibal Lecter
- Hannibal Lecter
- Posts: 18189
- Joined: November 18, 2020
-
-
Enchant Hannibal Lecter
- Hannibal Lecter
- Hannibal Lecter
- Posts: 18189
- Joined: November 18, 2020
-
-
Haschel Cedricson Mr. Know It All
- Mr. Know It All
- Mr. Know It All
- Posts: 2954
- Joined: May 14, 2007
- Location: Cascadian Subduction Zone
Fair, I thought you replaced in earlier than you did. Your predecessor also didn't mention Galron, although I suppose they didn't really mention anybody except their RVS vote.In post 1467, Enchant wrote:But i didn't do anything with Galron, i literally was not here.
It just doesn't feel like something Enchant wanted. I don't put too much stock in hammers, especially when other players are begging the rest of the game to hammer. If you want to put them on the passive list that's fine.In post 1472, Klick wrote:This feels like a really odd justification for not including Enchant in your set of people who actively or passively wanted the Eiralox elimination. Enchant did hammer Eiralox
I have confident townreads on T3 and Seanzie. After Eiralox flipped green despite scummy play I'm not comfortable saying anybody isKlick wrote:Do you have any confident reads Haschel?definitelyscum, but my gut says it's two of you/KT/Schadd.
Speaking of which, you completely ignored the last thing I said about KT. So,Vote: KittyTacky.-
-
T3 He/himSurvivorHe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11458
- Joined: February 19, 2021
- Pronoun: He/him
- Location: Boston
Not offering any content or reads and just sheeping someone?In post 1482, Enchant wrote:Also it's normal for Kitty.-
-
Enchant Hannibal Lecter
- Hannibal Lecter
- Hannibal Lecter
- Posts: 18189
- Joined: November 18, 2020
Yeah.In post 1484, T3 wrote:
Not offering any content or reads and just sheeping someone?In post 1482, Enchant wrote:Also it's normal for Kitty.-
-
Klick Flash Forward
- Flash Forward
- Flash Forward
- Posts: 12932
- Joined: September 1, 2012
I didn't really have anything to say about itIn post 1483, Haschel Cedricson wrote:Speaking of which, you completely ignored the last thing I said about KT.
I don't agree that schadd_ is a particularly weird choice of roleblock target-
-
Haschel Cedricson Mr. Know It All
- Mr. Know It All
- Mr. Know It All
- Posts: 2954
- Joined: May 14, 2007
- Location: Cascadian Subduction Zone
Elaborate on that.In post 1486, Klick wrote:
I didn't really have anything to say about itIn post 1483, Haschel Cedricson wrote:Speaking of which, you completely ignored the last thing I said about KT.
I don't agree that schadd_ is a particularly weird choice of roleblock target-
-
Klick Flash Forward
- Flash Forward
- Flash Forward
- Posts: 12932
- Joined: September 1, 2012
-
-
Seanzie Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 655
- Joined: May 29, 2021
I don't really agree with this read. Schadd was 1. more active/more on people's minds, and 2. better placed, than any of those other slots, so I think all else held equal Schadd would be less likely to carry the kill in fear of things like watcher (don't want your deepwolf going down because they submitted a kill) and because PRs tend to target their strongest scumread, which often is someone who is active enough to actually be scrutinized.In post 1488, Klick wrote:Like if schadd is on a scumteam he's not really unlikely to be the one submitting a kill
Actually I suppose schadd isn't that likely to be scum with someone like Enchant/Mala/myself due to that block? Because he'd likely submit a kill in those combinations
PEdit: can in a bit, putting kids to bed
However, I do give the conclusion weight for a different reason; Schadd being vanilla AND not submitting the kill makes them on the lower-probability side of possible scum, unless of course both remaining scum are vanilla, but I kind of doubt that's the case.-
-
Klick Flash Forward
- Flash Forward
- Flash Forward
- Posts: 12932
- Joined: September 1, 2012
First of all, I think redcardinal is a particularly unlikely player for KT!town to decide to roleblock specifically because KT had expressed suspicion of redcardinal; if KT's goal was to actually block a kill with a roleblock, he'd need to target someone who did not particularly expect to be roleblocked. Schadd is a fine guess for 'scum who would submit a kill' and probably one of my top choices if I were in KT's shoes.
And thinking about it I think redcardinal/schadd is also unlikely because schadd probably kills on that team as well-
-
Klick Flash Forward
- Flash Forward
- Flash Forward
- Posts: 12932
- Joined: September 1, 2012
I suppose it's a 'minimise risk of getting targeted' vs 'minimise damage if you are targeted' thing. I feel like scum are more likely to try to do the former in this situation, especially with one scum already downIn post 1489, Seanzie wrote:
I don't really agree with this read. Schadd was 1. more active/more on people's minds, and 2. better placed, than any of those other slots, so I think all else held equal Schadd would be less likely to carry the kill in fear of things like watcher (don't want your deepwolf going down because they submitted a kill) and because PRs tend to target their strongest scumread, which often is someone who is active enough to actually be scrutinized.In post 1488, Klick wrote:Like if schadd is on a scumteam he's not really unlikely to be the one submitting a kill
Actually I suppose schadd isn't that likely to be scum with someone like Enchant/Mala/myself due to that block? Because he'd likely submit a kill in those combinations
PEdit: can in a bit, putting kids to bed
However, I do give the conclusion weight for a different reason; Schadd being vanilla AND not submitting the kill makes them on the lower-probability side of possible scum, unless of course both remaining scum are vanilla, but I kind of doubt that's the case.-
-
Haschel Cedricson Mr. Know It All
- Mr. Know It All
- Mr. Know It All
- Posts: 2954
- Joined: May 14, 2007
- Location: Cascadian Subduction Zone
A KT/Schadd team is still on the table, in which case Schadd could have submitted the kill because he wasn't actually roleblocked.In post 1489, Seanzie wrote: However, I do give the conclusion weight for a different reason; Schadd being vanilla AND not submitting the kill makes them on the lower-probability side of possible scum, unless of course both remaining scum are vanilla, but I kind of doubt that's the case.
Preview Edit: If you are a town roleblocker, then it's reasonable to assume that the scum have power roles of their own. In that case you block your top scumread because either 1) You stop the kill, which hurts scum, or 2) Somebody else submitted the kill but it's likely you stopped the mafia from using one of their other powers, which hurts scum.-
-
Klick Flash Forward
- Flash Forward
- Flash Forward
- Posts: 12932
- Joined: September 1, 2012
I have my own thoughts on this, but I'd like to hear KT give a response to this post firstIn post 1492, Haschel Cedricson wrote:Preview Edit: If you are a town roleblocker, then it's reasonable to assume that the scum have power roles of their own. In that case you block your top scumread because either 1) You stop the kill, which hurts scum, or 2) Somebody else submitted the kill but it's likely you stopped the mafia from using one of their other powers, which hurts scum.-
-
Seanzie Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 655
- Joined: May 29, 2021
I personally play differently (in most situations where I have a low-poster scum in my scumchat I ask them to submit the kill since I usually don't play to sweep/win by a ton, but to win, and so I always try to keep someone who can carry in the best position possible, and low-posters usually cannot carry as they get PoE'd too easily), but sure, I can see why others might make another choice there. My point is that it definitely isn't something I'd clear those teams off of.In post 1491, Klick wrote:
I suppose it's a 'minimise risk of getting targeted' vs 'minimise damage if you are targeted' thing. I feel like scum are more likely to try to do the former in this situation, especially with one scum already downIn post 1489, Seanzie wrote:
I don't really agree with this read. Schadd was 1. more active/more on people's minds, and 2. better placed, than any of those other slots, so I think all else held equal Schadd would be less likely to carry the kill in fear of things like watcher (don't want your deepwolf going down because they submitted a kill) and because PRs tend to target their strongest scumread, which often is someone who is active enough to actually be scrutinized.In post 1488, Klick wrote:Like if schadd is on a scumteam he's not really unlikely to be the one submitting a kill
Actually I suppose schadd isn't that likely to be scum with someone like Enchant/Mala/myself due to that block? Because he'd likely submit a kill in those combinations
PEdit: can in a bit, putting kids to bed
However, I do give the conclusion weight for a different reason; Schadd being vanilla AND not submitting the kill makes them on the lower-probability side of possible scum, unless of course both remaining scum are vanilla, but I kind of doubt that's the case.-
-
T3 He/himSurvivorHe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11458
- Joined: February 19, 2021
- Pronoun: He/him
- Location: Boston
-
-
T3 He/himSurvivorHe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11458
- Joined: February 19, 2021
- Pronoun: He/him
- Location: Boston
…link?In post 1485, Enchant wrote:
Yeah.In post 1484, T3 wrote:
Not offering any content or reads and just sheeping someone?In post 1482, Enchant wrote:Also it's normal for Kitty.-
-
schadd_ he/itpandora's pukeboxhe/it
- pandora's pukebox
- pandora's pukebox
- Posts: 8023
- Joined: December 28, 2016
- Pronoun: he/it
- Location: mountain bathroom
i'm still pretty willing to believe mala is town. as i said i got frustrated by her a lot yesterday & i wanted to like go back on my claim that her sort of limited interaction with the game is town-indicative, but then the fact that i wanted that is a sign that she's not like intervening to keep it up. if that makes sense. anyway i also think gamma's townread on her is compelling. it sounded like they have a history and i guess i just feel like there would be a good basis to get a read on mala. & i think she was always confidently town on malaIn post 1453, Seanzie wrote:These are not the scum you're looking for.
Out of Mala/Klick/Haschel, who do you think is most likely scum and who is most likely town?
klick hasn't ever made me feel particularly like they're town. they don't have much of a sense that they're reacting to/processing how the game is going, and especially for d2 that seems a little bit more true than the replacement gives it reason to be. like when you hop in when there's stuff going on, you have the choice of keeping up with the present and getting the ball rolling quickly or just rereading the old stuff. maybe thats a personal choice, i don't know. it seemed like they were playing very uninteractively. i'd struggle to find a good partner for them, maybe like enchant or something. i do think kiri giri's posting abt galron mildly matches up with how you'd expect someone to try to defend a partner, it's interesting that they were really the only person that tried to do it
haschel more or less matches up with how i expect geriatric town players to play (geriatric being a term that refers to people who played on here like 10+ years ago and are used to a slower and maybe more straightforward game). he has a kind of high standard of analysis and questioning that reminds me of when i played with channel delibird 2 ish yrs ago. i vaguely expect that as scum he would be trying harder to push a scum wincon or like, actively seem to be town. there's nothing impenetrable here but i don't really wanna vote him & have continually not for maybe since d1
i assume you (seanzie) aren't like softing an inno on kitty here. in any case i think that it's extremely odd that he didn't die, to the extent that it occurs to me to say he's more likely scum than not; i don't remember the last time i've seen a scumteam on this site let a claimed pr live over somebody who couldn't reasonably have seemed to be a pr. i don't wanna vote him now because i dont think theres enough of a benefit that it outweighs the pr but that stands out to me a lot in any case. i've felt he's very marginally town based on play during the day. also no idea who his partner would be
ok well why did you do me first.In post 1466, Haschel Cedricson wrote:Before you ask, the one from Schadd is more detailed and has quotes because that's the one I did first.
.
i suppose i can't abide by the claim that it's scum-indicative for me to have been pushing eiralox. as i said i think there was ample reason to be scumreading them and i guess i meant it in a "yes even if eiralox is town" sort of way. and of course here we are
idk what you mean by foreshadowing. i dont think i ever felt the ties btwn eiralox and galron were very strongIn post 1466, Haschel Cedricson wrote:Foreshadowing on purpose? Later starts to tie Eiralox to Galron.
maybe you won't care to hear it from me but i did comment on that pairing in 1451. Somehow i dont think its very likely. incidentally i'll say that eiralox did ask kitty that in 899 (i noticed that post i think because i was looking for instances where they asked ppl questions)In post 1466, Haschel Cedricson wrote:What about a KT/Schadd pairing? This would require KT bussing Galron but otherwise fits. Nobody ever bothered to ask this for some reason and it's kind of too late now, butwhy did KT roleblock Schadd?
i'm also interested in this. yeah, there's like barely a caseIn post 1471, Klick wrote:
What about it specifically made sense to you?In post 1450, KittyTacky wrote:Re: schadd_
Yeah I thought RC was pretty scummy during the night but now I don't think so. The Klick case made sense to me.
I understand people feeling vaguely poor about this slot due to relative inactivity/optics, but redcardinal didn't really provide any evidence for my slot being scum outside of a personal theory of the scumteam
in my experience people on this site almost always proceed by trying to avoid tracker/jailer/roleblocker/alien than watcher. maybe the way i rattled off the roles hints at why i think that is. i'll also say watcher is uncommon, it appears half as often as tracker (alone) in normals. i think there's other reasons as wellIn post 1489, Seanzie wrote:I don't really agree with this read. Schadd was 1. more active/more on people's minds, and 2. better placed, than any of those other slots, so I think all else held equal Schadd would be less likely to carry the kill in fear of things like watcher (don't want your deepwolf going down because they submitted a kill) and because PRs tend to target their strongest scumread, which often is someone who is active enough to actually be scrutinized.
However, I do give the conclusion weight for a different reason; Schadd being vanilla AND not submitting the kill makes them on the lower-probability side of possible scum, unless of course both remaining scum are vanilla, but I kind of doubt that's the case.
as for that second thing: i literally said that yeah. i guess its hard to blame someone for not reading 1451-
-
schadd_ he/itpandora's pukeboxhe/it
- pandora's pukebox
- pandora's pukebox
- Posts: 8023
- Joined: December 28, 2016
- Pronoun: he/it
- Location: mountain bathroom
oh and he did answer even. 909In post 1497, schadd_ wrote:incidentally i'll say that eiralox did ask kitty that in 899 (i noticed that post i think because i was looking for instances where they asked ppl questions)-
-
schadd_ he/itpandora's pukeboxhe/it
- pandora's pukebox
- pandora's pukebox
- Posts: 8023
- Joined: December 28, 2016
- Pronoun: he/it
- Location: mountain bathroom
i saw this again and thot it was funny. probably i should have townread it. maybe i kind of didIn post 914, Eiralox wrote:I appreciate Enchant backing me up here, town points for them,
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
-