like as an example i get the idea of being just an absolutely irritable, fed up townie (and i am often am under pressure) because wtf else is he supposed to do? i think the uh, whatever number counting thing theory going on lately is pretty petty and not like solvey too but unfortunately s_s is one of the people i think doing it is a bit less ai than the normIn post 6662, Something_Smart wrote:so you do understand that this was a throwaway vote made because of one thing that rubbed me the wrong way + I wanted to draw attention to his weak-ish arguments + it was the middle of the night + I was in an irritable mood from something else + L + ratio. This was not by any means an elaborate or well-constructed case, it's not a hill I want to die on, but it's the hill I'm on right now.In post 6636, Datisi wrote:amazing
(this is a reminder not to forget about this once you are done analyzing timestamps)In post 6625, Datisi wrote:s_s voting nero is... interesting, i guess. the "if i wanted to live, why wouldn't i just be pushing menalque" *feels* like it's supposed to be wifom on mena's alignment after s_s flips red. not 100% on that but it feels like a scummy post in my bones. idk if i can explain it but i guess.
i guess i'd like s_s to tell me how sure he really is that nero is scum, and how he thinks scum-nero navigated his two flipped buddies, bc like... i currently think nero looks the best out of all associates-wise.
When doing my funny response time ISO nonsense, I did see some interactions between Nero and flipped scum. I could go back and look at those; were there any particular ones you had in mind as anti-partnery? I do recall from being scum with Nero (a long time ago) that he was pretty good at setting up interactions with his partners that were hard to catch. That was a large game, and he solo endgamed, so people had plenty of opportunity to look through his interactions.
howeeeever. i also think that this defense (it was just an annoyed vote) has the capacity to be wolfy too because it's a lot easier to defend a vote emotionally than it is logically and i think that a wolf!s_s probably is smart enough to know he wouldn't have great logic to defend the vote on its own
so presented: the waffling, an example.
i struggle to find a lot i waffle on wrt mena's slot sans obscure's like... being new here and the emotional aspect but that's still like... not... really defensible beyond my little heartstrings hurting