IF I FOLLOWED UP ANY HARD HARDER ON MY SUSPICIONS OF 190 THEN MY SKULL WOULD EXPLODE.In post 389, Dannflor wrote:It’s a little hard for me to be objective about, but the way he jumped on my earlier wall post is very reminiscent of the types of votes I tend to make as scum when I perceive a townie making a “bad” post. There was a lack of any sort of real engagement or follow up with my post, even in a confrontational manner.
HOW HAS MY MANNER NOT BEEN CONFRONTATIONAL? TELL ME. TELL ME HOW I HAVE NOT BEEN CONFRONTATIONAL IN CALLING OUT YOUR SCUMMY POSTS SO I CAN BE MORE DIRECT ABOUT WHICH ROLE PM YOU GOT.
I AM NOT LUCIAN OR CEPHRIR. YOU SAID THAT I HAVE NOT BEEN CONFRONTATIONAL OR ENGAGED IN MY PROCESS OF SORTING YOU. ARE YOU GOING TO ELABORATE OR JUST KEEP SHADING MY SLOT?In post 389, Dannflor wrote:Compare to Lucian and Cephrir, who had similarly negative reactions but also seemed genuinely curious and tried to understand me.
WHERE? WHICH POST? WHICH POST DID I NOT SEEM CURIOUS ABOUT YOUR ALIGNMENT? WHERE IS THE POST LINK OR THE QUOTE OF THE POST WHERE I DID NOT SEEM CURIOUS ABOUT YOUR ALIGNMENT?In post 389, Dannflor wrote:I think his most recent post assuming that the contradictions in my most recent posts are some sort of scummy mistake rather than me just having thoughts I’m keeping to myself or changing my mind on certain things is another example of BEAR not seeming to be actually curious about my alignment.
YOU MEAN THIS ONE?
NO? YOU MEANT THIS ONE?In post 374, SCRRRDBEAR wrote:IS DANNFLOR SOLVEY IN THE BIG HOOD? WHAT ABOUT RADJA?
WHERE IS THE POST WHERE I DO NOT SEEM CURIOUS ABOUT YOUR ALIGNMENT?In post 380, SCRRRDBEAR wrote:...In post 314, Dannflor wrote:I am hereIn post 304, Cephrir wrote:I want the slot to post more before we seriously contemplate killing it anyways tho
In post 320, Dannflor wrote:i think we should probably kill somnus but that ending the day so early would be disadvantageous
WHERE IS THE FOLLOW UP TO SORTING CAKEZ IN 313, DANNFLOR?
...In post 353, Dannflor wrote:I think it quite valuable to flip somnus and taking for granted that Somnus is definitely scum is hubris
In post 375, SCRRRDBEAR wrote:THEY AREN'T SOLVEY IN THREAD SO I ASSUME THEY POST IDEAS IN BIG HOOD.In post 374, SCRRRDBEAR wrote:IS DANNFLOR SOLVEY IN THE BIG HOOD? WHAT ABOUT RADJA?In post 377, Dannflor wrote:I’m not gonna lie half the reason I want to flip Somnus is because I think scrrrdbear is likely mafia
WHERE IS THE FOLLOW UP TO SORTING SOMNUS IN 353, DANNFLOR?
FIRE IS A GOOD SERVANT BUT A BAD MASTER
ONLYYOUCAN PREVENT WILDFIRES
VOTE: DANNFLORIn post 350, catboi wrote:With 9 alive, it's 5 to eliminate.
WHY DID YOU MAKE IT SO AMBIGUOUS WHAT YOU ARE REFERRING TO THROUGHOUT 389?
WHY ARE YOU CHANGING THE SUBJECT ONTO MY READ ON ISIS? YOU HAVE NEVER PROVIDED EVIDENCE FOR HOW I HAVE NOT FOLLOWED UP ON MY SUSPICIONS OF 190 OR BEEN ENGAGED IN MY PROCESS OF SORTING YOU. THIS IS A COMPLETELY UNRELATED POINT WHICH YOU AGAIN DO NOT PROVIDE CONCRETE QUOTES OR TAGS OF WHAT I ACTUALLY SAID.In post 389, Dannflor wrote:I still think the way he brushed off his Isis progression as just being, her posts got better, a little intentionally obtuse when he told me I was under thinking his original reasoning.
WHAT? THIS IS ANOTHER UNRELATED POINT. WHAT DOES SOMNUS WAGON HAVE TO DO WITH HOW I AM NOT ENGAGED OR CONFRONTATIONAL IN MY PROCESS OF SORTING YOU?In post 389, Dannflor wrote:I also think BEAR seems to have a vested interest in not letting a Somnus wagon build up too much momentum because I don’t think BEAR believes anyone ever townreads him more than Lucian. Yes, I know BEAR already voted Somnus, but I don’t think the timing or context of that vote matches a real motivation to kill Somnus.
WHAT?? HOW DOES USING MY HOOD HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH A LACK OF FOLLOW UP ON MY SUSPICIONS OF 190 AND A LACK OF ENGAGEMENT IN DEVELOPING MY READ ON YOU.In post 389, Dannflor wrote:I’m worried BEAR is using the hood to pocket Lucian right now uncontested by Somnus. I honestly think that’s the only reason to use the small hood with scum still potentially in it. You are *only* hiding information from potential townies.
...OH, THAT WAS 389 THE ENTIRE SECTION ON ME. YOU NEVER ELABORATED ON THIS CLAIM:
INSTEAD OF PROVIDING RATIONALE AND EXAMPLES FOR THIS CLAIM, YOU CHANGED THE SUBJECT ONTO RANDOM TOPICS TO SHADE MY CREDIBILITY AND DID NOT PROVIDE ANY POST TAGS OR QUOTES AT ANY POINT FOR WHAT YOU WERE REFERRING TO.In post 389, Dannflor wrote:It’s a little hard for me to be objective about, but the way he jumped on my earlier wall post is very reminiscent of the types of votes I tend to make as scum when I perceive a townie making a “bad” post. There was a lack of any sort of real engagement or follow up with my post, even in a confrontational manner.
NO. THERE'S A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN APPROACHING IN BAD FAITH AND CALLING OUT SCUMMY POSTS. THIS IS THE LATTER. YOU'VE MADE SCUM TELLS REPEATEDLY STARTING IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF 190 AND YOU'RE CONTINUING TO MAKE THEM HERE IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF 389.In post 389, Dannflor wrote:As far as BEAR goes, I don’t think the way he’s approached me has been in good faith.
