I had same thoughts.In post 893, UNOwen wrote:King should take advise of the town, but not be driven by it. Weak kings are the bane of any kingdom. The reason choosing a town king is important is because they will be deciding PRs, which is a great advantage if they can stack the council with town. Moving to a consensus for PRs seems to allow scum an easier route into the council if they miss out on the kingship. And your post didn't really take into account Andres role in the decision at all.In post 881, VP Baltar wrote: A king should always take their subjects' desires into decision making. It's why we need a to follow my criteria for choosing a king.
I also just think we need something new to move discussion forward and I don't really care if people level zero attack me over it.
Do you have issues with my list generally other than I made it? who on there do you think shouldn't have power and who would you put in their place?
I can't decide my council unless and until I get elected, at which point the game will have presumably changed significantly because it looks like an uphill climb at the moment. I'm not actively distrusting any of GuiltyLion/TSQ/Dannflor/Andres though, so don't have an issue with the list in those terms - with the exception of you, who is suspicious to me.
Fine.
VOTE: UNOwen