a claim from me that moved the wagon elsehwere would have resulted in a 3rd claim and so on...In post 1216, innocentvillager wrote:In post 1150, innocentvillager wrote:geraint can you answer this please?In post 1121, innocentvillager wrote:Based on your recent posting, it sounds like if Scol hadn't claimed then you wouldn't be as opposed to claiming. So every claim in your eyes is severely -EV to town. Is that correct?
My question to you is: Do you really think the difference between 0->1 claims is not as large as the difference between 1-2 claims?
I would say no, and I think you need to present a compelling argument if you believe otherwise.
The fact of the matter is, Scol has already claimed, we cannot change that 1 person has claimed. So if you would claim if Scol hadn't claimed but not right now, I suggest you reconsider it from a logical perspective.In post 1122, innocentvillager wrote:If you are not going to claim, I think you should at the very least genuinely look at it from the perspective of an uninformed townie in this game and suggest a reasonable course of action. I know you think Scol is townier than not, but we have to do *something*. You can bombshell a case on someone else if not. Make a case for that something even if you feel like it's choosing between the best of a few bad worlds.In post 1120, innocentvillager wrote:Do you not want to claim on D1 when you get run up in general? Is it because Scol already claimed? Is it because of the nature of your role? Help us understand so we can talk you into doing itIn post 1114, geraintm wrote:I shall say again, I am not going to claim I have a role.
I know you said that you don't like running up too many people on D1 and that sentiment is somewhat understandable to me. I believe Val for example laid out a bunch of reasons why it's better for you to claim. Another relevant thing seems to be that Toto's information can help town and your claim might assist in that. Please discuss these issues in more depth or claim.
Because if you don't claim we are actually just going to kill youNone of this was addressedIn post 1169, innocentvillager wrote:First of all I would say it's important to distinguish those for clarity of communication especially in this case. You are implying that just because in one of his recent game's, scum was eliminated D1, so he should logically reverse his policy or otherwise he's scum for sticking to that belief. Clarifying that he only said d1 wagon is <rand to be town weakens that argument a lot.
The issue is I think he at the very least holds this belief as town too. I agree with you that it is "wack", and that@geraintm needs to actually proactively contribute to and suggest town's path forward(we have to do SOMETHING).
If we are killing geraint, I think we should be honest about how much of the kill is genuine belief in him being scum and how much of it is policy. It feels to me like part of you wanting geraint dead is emotional/policy (which is fine). I think there is a portion of my current vote on geraint that is policy too.
The only defense I hear repeated over and over again is "i don't want to die but it is bad if scum runs up 'multiple' wagons and so therefore I should just not claim despite town saying they'll kill me if I don't" which just doesnt answer any specific questions and is just a massive leap in logic imo
a course of action - would no lim be ok?