it’s not just kinda ???In post 374, Not Known 15 wrote:Why's that a problem?
narrow parking is suspect, and if Enchant is the ACF then Enchant might currently vote a Gnosia, yes. It's actually unlikely that Gnosia would claim Engineer when there's an ACF around - especially when it could land them in a 1v2.In post 375, shiki wrote:it’s not just kinda ???In post 374, Not Known 15 wrote:Why's that a problem?
like if one uninformed traitor no info anyway
so it’s like,
are you assuming enchant happens to be voting a gnosia? or is gnosia and thus knowingly voting a teammate? or do you just think narrow parking is the very most likely non-enchant non-town right now?
or?
this take is insaneIn post 208, Marashu wrote: Why are you letting others scumhunt so you can just sit back and decide?
In post 208, Marashu wrote:I'm not seeing any attempt to sort in your posts.
so when i say it im crazy when the "cop" says it, ignored.In post 213, Not Known 15 wrote: Yeah we need to move on from this pointless engineer debate. We are not going to be sorted yet.
VOTE: narrow parking
i don't understand the incongruence ur seeing hereIn post 231, JunkoChan wrote:huh, excuse me how do you go from 227 to 229?In post 229, Klick wrote:VOTE: JunkoChan
She posts a lot and says a lot of things that look vaguely helpful but I don't think any of them are town things.
?? its a block of idk... u don't wanna ask any questions abt it? what's the point of asking?In post 249, Scoliosis wrote:UNVOTE: junko
VOTE: jessicarabbit
That's enough for me at this stage of the game.
she does it every gameIn post 323, Scoliosis wrote: I hate the decreasing number of brackets (7 brackets in 317 and 6 brackets in 320) between your posts here in addition to the fact you posted a reads list twice within 6 minutes. I think posting a reads list multiple times like that is lamist and I feel like you're hoping someone will read your posts and not the time stamps and think you are "reflecting." I think the fact you chose of all things to decrease the brackets is scummy because at least in 317 it's easy to tell that the middle bracket is meant to be null. Now in 320 it's ambiguous what you even mean and you can just lie about it later and wifom when people "misunderstand" your reads.
is this not the objective of mafiaIn post 351, Klick wrote:Not everyone you play against is actually a mastermind trying to 3d chess their way into your town listIn post 350, JunkoChan wrote:inb4 WhAt DoEs ScUm!ElMo GaIn FrOm SuCh a TeRriBlE eNtRaNcE?
answer: your gullible townread on them
what's everyones under/over on # of claims nk15 is making this game i say 5In post 357, Not Known 15 wrote:Ok. My ability was activated.... and although it isn't strictly one-shot it is de-facto.
What my ability does is to inform Gnosia about their chances to get caught in a lie...
which means that the Gnosia have the information that my ability is real and the rest of the players has not.
What my ability does NOT do is to actually detect lies. That's probably someone else.
Which means it's mainly a TMI trap.
can we explain for the rest of the classIn post 361, Not Known 15 wrote:I realized that there is no more use for it; it has been talked about extensively. People have already made their stance regarding my ability.In post 358, JunkoChan wrote:so why you decided to out this now?
But it's also that you somehow trust Enchant, even after this reaction:That's not a town thought progress(yes, I know, I am biased. It's still not.In post 287, Enchant wrote:Don't do it.
It's bait. He will say "Scoliosis lied!!!!" and push you afterwards.
so... u accept the cc?Not Known 15 wrote: narrow parking is suspect, and if Enchant is the ACF then Enchant might currently vote a Gnosia, yes. It's actually unlikely that Gnosia would claim Engineer when there's an ACF around - especially when it could land them in a 1v2.
?In post 377, narrow parking wrote:so... u accept the cc?
Catching up, I think this spews Enchant as the likely engineer here.In post 378, Enchant wrote:Right now i am motivated by pressuring narrow so he claims he is Not Engineer, so he won't pull claim from his ass if/after NK15 die.
i forgot acf = traitor, that's my bad ignore my comment.
i would be fine with everyone claiming everything today but everytime i’ve suggested that day one in the past there was a lot of pushback i think people find it to be Not Fun which is fine i get itIn post 378, Enchant wrote:Right now i am motivated by pressuring narrow so he claims he is Not Engineer, so he won't pull claim from his ass if/after NK15 die.
how do u define pressureIn post 378, Enchant wrote:narrow
My POWERFUL vote
what makes u think i would even claim engineer in the futureIn post 385, Enchant wrote:My POWERFUL vote
... No really, admit you are not engineer and i move on on next lead.
Is the YOUR in your post the actual correct spelling because, shouldn’t it be “YOU’RE”?In post 279, Not Known 15 wrote:I have used it already...In post 278, Scoliosis wrote:I never said that it doesIn post 275, Not Known 15 wrote:Why do you think it has to be that way?In post 165, Scoliosis wrote:Based on activity level: shiki, autere, marashu, ranger, fakegod probably has an active scum poster in it. Nk15 is scum who is limping along. I'd guess there is one scum who is being flakey and not posting.
I think NK15 is really in his element this game (as the traitor.) Baiting the cop to claim, lurking, and then flame baiting random players seems to be his cup of tea.
Nk15 have you claimed your character ability yet? I prefer that you do that sooner rather later.
but to be clear: Quote the bolded post in my ISO.
Referencing the bolded obviously and yes, I am human.In post 390, Jessica Rabbit wrote:Because NK15’s claim makes me think of Real Dolls’ ad or something.
I think Ranger has it backwards. I understand your CC but I think NK15 was baiting a CC.In post 387, Enchant wrote:You try to imply like you are one. "If i am engineer i wouldn't claim here" is something which sets me off.
The spelling is not a mistake.In post 389, Jessica Rabbit wrote:Is the YOUR in your post the actual correct spelling because, shouldn’t it be “YOU’RE”?
u not rockin with hypotheticals??In post 387, Enchant wrote:You try to imply like you are one. "If i am engineer i wouldn't claim here" is something which sets me off.
Can you explain this?In post 394, Not Known 15 wrote:The spelling is not a mistake.In post 389, Jessica Rabbit wrote:Is the YOUR in your post the actual correct spelling because, shouldn’t it be “YOU’RE”?
Spicy
