451,
367,
458
tl;dr
Dragons/Elements/Passenger scum, Eiralox/HPE/Bella town
I am sorry for invoking thread death with Flea.
@BBT, @Titus, @Enchant, @Dragons and @Passenger have content to respond to below. My suspicion of
Enchant
is growing.
PSA
As far as I can understand the concepts, the below post is both toxicity-free and a good overall post.
We've decided that our war with Flea was more likely to be a thunderdome and I'd like to apologize for the part I played in invoking thread death. As far as changes I can make I think I can promise to avoid sustained, back-to-back postings tunnel visioned on conflict with another player for the rest of the game.
I'm re-asserting that the associative tell I pointed out (
131 and
137 being scum theater) between Dragons and Elements is more likely to be correct than wrong. I've realized my post
149 details an analogy which is abstract. I've stepped back the best I can to determine whether it's unlikely to be understood because there is no logic or because the logic is too difficult to see. I've decided that the logic is simply difficult to see and it's beyond my abilities as a player to communicate it in a way that everyone can understand.
I would accept an all-or-nothing, no-takeback deal that the scum team contains
at least
and
all of
Dragons/Elements/Passenger. I have
comparatively
nothing concrete to say on anyone elses alignment including Flea, except I'm pretty confident that Eiralox, HPE and Bella are Town and Enchant is in the dog house.
In post 519, Save The Dragons wrote:titus's lack of presence bothers me a little but not enough to really worry about her
i have no read on bbt at this time
mala seems town i feel like staying out of the butting heads and going hard on someone else seems like it's avoiding the easy scum play of taking a side. it feels more like town apathy/annoyance of the battle going back and forth.
i'm suspicious of dan and am a little shocked at all the town reads on him. his vote on me seems a little lazy. i guess he explains it later, and i don't mind his recent big post so much except for the bit about analysis which i think he's wrong and i'm right and i don't know if that's because he's scum trying to attribute something when it's not there to make me look bad or if he just believes what he says. i dunno. i don't have a solid scumlean on him but i'm just wary.
This pings me for the "talk to me, not about me" scum tell I 100% learned from Bella because she said it in back-to-back games D1 to slots who got townread as scum and proceeded to endgame.
I'm looking at Dragon's iso and I'm not seeing any effort to engage or sort slots like ActionDan, Titus. I find it interesting that BBT--who has become Dragon's flying monkey (which I mean it no shade, no tea)--Dragons "has no read on" despite also being implicated by Bella in
458 as an underperformer.
It feels like Dragons saw the posts I linked at the top here (
451,
367 and
458) and thought slots like ActionDan and Titus would be well-recieved as targets for him to push. I see no signs or indicators or feel any intuition that these are reads or players that Dragons has been considering or thinking about.
__
I'm repeating this just for you, BBT.
[
519] pings me for the "talk to me, not about me" scum tell I 100% learned from Bella because she said it in back-to-back games D1 to slots who got townread as scum and proceeded to endgame.
Townreading posts like
519 is a
I learned the hard way by
I am genuinely trying to help you by pointing out this pattern to you. I'm not really a "bruh" person but I think it's fair to say that if I were I would consider you a "bruh" because you were a strategic, selfless team player who set Eiralox and I up for victory in a really difficult scum game which enabled me to become more confident as a player. I think
458 implies Bella enjoys playing with you and/or sees potential in you as a player and I would rather roll with that mindset. IDK what else to say except that I am telling the truth and trying to work with you.
You remember how Eiralox' slot coasted to victory?
In post 2387, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I wouldn't put too much blame on yourself. For various reasons, Eira seemed pretty widely town read in the game so it's not on you by any means
Guess who noticed something D1 which no one paid attention to?
In post 765, Bellaphant wrote:@eir, come talk to me, not about me?
I think fire could be town and frog could be scum. I low key think aisa might be town but it's a meta read and not a good one. Grib can be town. In annoyed no one engaged me on hpe. I find the back and forth between grid/tsq/fire/frog/a little bbt soeta unreadable' because it looks like a pissing contest and I never get anything out of them.
So, there's some stuff to get your teeth into
P-edit enchant could well be scum. I don't want nm ans enchant to be scum but I've played with both of them recently and won in a scum team with nm, they could both be doing more
Now I've tried to be careful to avoid making an actual meta argument here. I don't want to hear that you reject all this because you "don't care about meta." I'm not making a damn meta argument, I'm pointing out a general scum tell which IME is consistently missed by like every Town. Dragons has just demonstrated it in
519 and is demonstrating it again now in
542. Dragons does not have depth to his reads because he isn't Town and consequently his takes haven't developed in spite of all his "activity."
FMPOV I tried my best here and there is nothing else I can do wrt your reads that can be productive unless you're willing to consider what I have to say.
__
@Passenger
In post 523, Passenger wrote: In post 201, Killing Joke wrote:
In post 194, Save The Dragons wrote:i don't know that you're scum i'm just voting you right now because i think it's the most likely option but if you want to prove me wrong you can try
Unlike the above post from STD which I fail to see any townie thought process whatsoever. lol
Did you (idk if it was Nancy or Frogster though) not do this exact same thing with Wayward?
Passenger, I know you claimed to have read up to some page or whatever in your ISO, but I think that you're lying and you haven't read a single page of this game or even more than two consecutive back-to-back posts.
Feel free to try and prove me wrong in 36 hours when you glance at the thread again. Apparently you've been busy "playing lots of livechat mafia" so you can show us what other scum tricks you've learned there (cough cough
183.)
__
@Titus
@Titus
@Titus
INCOMING INCOMING INCOMING! RULE OF THREE ALERT!
In post 524, Passenger wrote: In post 231, Save The Dragons wrote:Std: hey guys I'm worried about kj I'm gonna put a vote there see what happens
Kj: STD IS SCUM AND SO IS EVERYONE WHO DEFENDS HIM
HERE IS SOME META THAT IS TANGENTIALLY RELATED BUT WE'RE PRENTENDING IT'S A SCUMCLAIM.
town: *applause* let's wagon std
Do you have counterexamples of you doing the same thing as town?
In post 523, Passenger wrote: In post 201, Killing Joke wrote:
In post 194, Save The Dragons wrote:i don't know that you're scum i'm just voting you right now because i think it's the most likely option but if you want to prove me wrong you can try
Unlike the above post from STD which I fail to see any townie thought process whatsoever. lol
Did you (idk if it was Nancy or Frogster though) not do this exact same thing with Wayward?
In post 181, Passenger wrote:
Why did you feel the need to ask this question? I hadn’t made any posts since then. Honestly, all your content in this page feels like filler.
RULE OF 3 ALERT
Passenger
only soft pushes AND only soft pushes:
KJ WAYWARD
DRAGONS
__
@Dragons
In post 501, Save The Dragons wrote: In post 460, Killing Joke wrote:I'm not sure how Passenger is going to explain scum reading Dragons and I. They aren't a beginner and that take seems really unintuitive to me.
perhaps the only thing we see eye to eye on
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol2.gif)
Now you want to try being chummy with me to get me off your tail, scum butt? Or are you desperate to appear not-associated with Passenger and it had nothing to do with my slot?
This is the officially named "reverse 'NSG TELL
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
''" fyi. Scum!indicative forcing a dumb jokey into a post in a context which is unnatural for a townie to be jokey.
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=90273
__
@Dragons@Passenger
In post 524, Passenger wrote: In post 231, Save The Dragons wrote:Std: hey guys I'm worried about kj I'm gonna put a vote there see what happens
Kj: STD IS SCUM AND SO IS EVERYONE WHO DEFENDS HIM
HERE IS SOME META THAT IS TANGENTIALLY RELATED BUT WE'RE PRENTENDING IT'S A SCUMCLAIM.
town: *applause* let's wagon std
Do you have counterexamples of you doing the same thing as town?
Executive Director: ARRGH! THESPIANS...WHERE'S THE PASSION? WHERE IS THE EXCITEMENT? WHAT ARE YOUR CHARACTERS TRYING TO ACHIEVE!?! SHOULD I CALL THE UNDERSTUDIES IN AND GIVE THEM A DRESS REHEARSAL?
__
@Enchant
In post 466, Enchant wrote: In post 461, Bellaphant wrote: In post 44, Enchant wrote: In post 2, Aisa wrote:- The Town are called Crew, VTs are called Loyal Sailors, Town PRs are called Officers - whose flavours are derived from traditional roles on ships, and/or piracy in popular culture. At least half of the Crew are Loyal Sailors.
what officer could be miller
In post 315, Enchant wrote:I aleays say, if you can say how different you are as mafia and town, then you can manipulate it.
In post 377, Enchant wrote:I like Passenger, congrats you are now doublevoter.
... Whew, mafia is hard.
The first...three posts are townie and the last two are gross. I particularly don't understand the hpe wagon at all and it seemed like a distraction to progress. Also, singling out passenger is just strange to me
Jealous?
In post 468, Enchant wrote:
I picked them almost randomly for no reason to see how it ends.
Enchant, you blew off my attempts to engage with you in
452 and
462 which I believe is scum!indicative for you. I also believe Town!Enchant is likely to engage with
84, and at the very least, it's a terrible sign that I've put more effort into mech than you have.
I have three things now which are town!indicative for you which you can attempt to follow up on if my suspicions about you are wrong:
Help with Dragon wagon and post more quantity (
452)
ISO dive someone (
462)
Expand on or suggest an alternative to my theory 12:4 town:scum ratio (
84)
I'll interpret continued silence from you as
fear
scum!indicative.
__
![Image](https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTJmG0PkC522ke1c73mpA3-PvNDffWIx2Wfkg&usqp=CAU)