why should enchant be read by their unreliability in assessing themselves? (?????)
seems like word salad for the sake of framing to me
Are you feigning the ability to not comprehend words?
here ya go in an easy-to-digest version:
i say "enchant no do stuff"
enchant say "nuh-uh, i do stuff"
i say "what enchant say about enchant unreliable"
enchant say "why try if unreliable"
i say "i only talk about what enchant say about self not what enchant say about others"
that help? do I need to use smaller words?
You're being obtuse.
The entire premise of your supposition is that Enchant isn't trying, this is you belief plastered onto their conduct, and when they counter this your only retort is 'you are unreliable, therefore my initial point stands and what I'm saying is right because I said you're unreliable'
therefore
word salad for the sake of framing.
Enchant is, in fact, trying. There Alchemist vote, them sticking with it, is more effort me or Dionysus have done in a while.
So basically: You're bad cos I say you're bad enchant, and whatever you say back is wrong, cos I say you're unreliabe.
try harder water bird
i think you have tried significantly more than enchant in the last 10 pages
In post 975, PenguinPower wrote:
Eiralox either has the brain cell count of a prokaryote or is scum failing really hard and crafting a false narrative...unsure which
i think they're town
idk im biased but it's hard for me to see eir/csf as scum right now because they could have easily gotten away with voting me out
Enchant, Alchemist says they're not mafia. That gonna make you unvote?
if i see someone to vote instead
Who are your actual scumreads right now?
Not really
Ok. Don’t claim you’re trying to catch scum if you’re not even forming reads.
This push on Enchant seems like Alchemist is caught scum trying to divert attention away by starting a 1v1? Maybe?
If I were scum with a Town Cephrir, I’d try to corral people back to that wagon, and if I’m scum with a scum Cephrir I don’t join that wagon in the first place.
idk about that. i think without frog on board i'm probably not happening
In post 859, Brickwalll wrote:
I’m back with a lot of pages having passed since I last was here. Please point me to anything I’ve missed or pressing, and I’ll begin reading through.
Brickwalll: haven't seen you around lately bud what timezone are you in?
In post 975, PenguinPower wrote:
Eiralox either has the brain cell count of a prokaryote or is scum failing really hard and crafting a false narrative...unsure which
i think they're town
idk im biased but it's hard for me to see eir/csf as scum right now because they could have easily gotten away with voting me out
maybe - but i have a hard time believing town unintentionally misunderstood and then doubled-down like that.
In post 263, Alchemist21 wrote:
No. That’s my take on the general mindset players would have as they enter the thread.
What you’re saying doesn’t even make sense. I’m calling the behavior Towny, so why would I also be subtly asking them to improve it? Or do you think I was telling them to keep doing what they’re doing, and if that’s the case why do you think I would even feel a need to coach them then?
There’s also the fact that post 2 says in the rules all PTs have Daytalk, so if I were scum with Eiralox I could just coach them there.
Perhaps time has passed so I think you are reading too much into it. I don’t understand why you think calling their behaviour towny is a good defence for you though? Of course scum is going to call their scum partners behaviour towny.
I also understand there are PT in day phase, but not all coaching has to be conveyed. Coaching can be implied like the way you did it making a general statement about how a town or would act but subtly it was directed at someone specific.
In post 1033, Cephrir wrote:
i have to imagine once you started making comments about his intelligence he would probably get stubborn regardless of alignment
why should enchant be read by their unreliability in assessing themselves? (?????)
seems like word salad for the sake of framing to me
i dont think you're reading this exchange correctly -- they were not saying this makes enchant scum, only that we can't believe enchant when he says "i'm putting in effort" if his posts don't show it because he's biased
why should enchant be read by their unreliability in assessing themselves? (?????)
seems like word salad for the sake of framing to me
Are you feigning the ability to not comprehend words?
here ya go in an easy-to-digest version:
i say "enchant no do stuff"
enchant say "nuh-uh, i do stuff"
i say "what enchant say about enchant unreliable"
enchant say "why try if unreliable"
i say "i only talk about what enchant say about self not what enchant say about others"
that help? do I need to use smaller words?
You're being obtuse.
The entire premise of your supposition is that Enchant isn't trying, this is you belief plastered onto their conduct, and when they counter this your only retort is 'you are unreliable, therefore my initial point stands and what I'm saying is right because I said you're unreliable'
therefore
word salad for the sake of framing.
Enchant is, in fact, trying. There Alchemist vote, them sticking with it, is more effort me or Dionysus have done in a while.
So basically: You're bad cos I say you're bad enchant, and whatever you say back is wrong, cos I say you're unreliabe.
try harder water bird
i think you have tried significantly more than enchant in the last 10 pages
In post 975, PenguinPower wrote:
Eiralox either has the brain cell count of a prokaryote or is scum failing really hard and crafting a false narrative...unsure which
i think they're town
idk im biased but it's hard for me to see eir/csf as scum right now because they could have easily gotten away with voting me out
hmmmm but that would have exposed scum! me, yes? voting out raccoons so early? so meh, like, anyone coulda voted you out so anyone not on you is town? i'm not being difficult, i just don't like being townread is all
In post 975, PenguinPower wrote:
Eiralox either has the brain cell count of a prokaryote or is scum failing really hard and crafting a false narrative...unsure which
i think they're town
idk im biased but it's hard for me to see eir/csf as scum right now because they could have easily gotten away with voting me out
maybe - but i have a hard time believing town unintentionally misunderstood and then doubled-down like that.
In post 975, PenguinPower wrote:
Eiralox either has the brain cell count of a prokaryote or is scum failing really hard and crafting a false narrative...unsure which
i think they're town
idk im biased but it's hard for me to see eir/csf as scum right now because they could have easily gotten away with voting me out
hmmmm but that would have exposed scum! me, yes? voting out raccoons so early? so meh, like, anyone coulda voted you out so anyone not on you is town? i'm not being difficult, i just don't like being townread is all
you in particular could have easily gotten away with it because i was antagonizing you somewhat
also not anyone could have -- some players were too afk to vote me or hadn't taken a hard stance but you actively applied the brakes for a moment. i'm obviously not an easy player to elim so i think it'd be a very tempting opportunity