Mini Normal 2289 - Postgame

[Alianna]

3.04

Votecount 3.04

Brickwalll (2): T3, furtiveglance
Not_Mafia (1): Eiralox
furtiveglance (1): Save The Dragons
T3 (1): Brickwalll

Not Voting (4): Not_Mafia, Enchant, Cephrir, Firebringer

With 9 players alive, it takes 5 votes to secure an execution.

The day deadline is in (expired on 2023-02-26 22:40:17).

[Not_Mafia]

Gamma?

I mean Enchant

[Not_Mafia]

Hi Firebringer!

[Cephrir]

nm what have your targets been & why

[Brickwalll]

I think Brickwall just chose to claim a random PR instead of 1v1ing Enchant

You’re giving me way too much credit. Think this was a plan by scum in terms of NK.

CSF was pretty mutual and easy NK target. I have been more confrontational and thus been kept around. I think this would have been discussed amongst scum and now furtive is putting that plan into action. Starting the bandwagon and the rest will hold on.

I also have zero belief in Not Mafia’s claim. He’s making it up as he’s going along in my opinion.

VOTE: Furtive

[Cephrir]

@brick why did you target CSF
@enchant why did you target brick and what is your modifier
@masons did you crumb and what does your pt look like

earth to enchant

come in, enchant

[Cephrir]

I think Brickwall just chose to claim a random PR instead of 1v1ing Enchant

You’re giving me way too much credit. Think this was a plan by scum in terms of NK.

CSF was pretty mutual and easy NK target. I have been more confrontational and thus been kept around. I think this would have been discussed amongst scum and now furtive is putting that plan into action. Starting the bandwagon and the rest will hold on.

I also have zero belief in Not Mafia’s claim. He’s making it up as he’s going along in my opinion.

VOTE: Furtive

i feel like there is some support for the idea that notmafia has had this claim planed since at least yesterday given his comments but im not sure how he managed to not protect frogster

[Firebringer]

Hi Firebringer!

too late u already broke my heart

[Firebringer]

cephrir on a scale of 1 to super cerial.
How serious should i take this game tbh

[Enchant]

@brick why did you target CSF
@enchant why did you target brick and what is your modifier
@masons did you crumb and what does your pt look like

earth to enchant

come in, enchant

I excluded NM, Eira and then tossed dice.
I don't want to claim modifier.

[Cephrir]

cephrir on a scale of 1 to super cerial.
How serious should i take this game tbh

i would never tell you not to have fun

i personally have been having fun trying to solve it despite the lack of success ive experienced thus far

but maybe if we killed enchant that would change

anyway i dunno how bout a 4 id enjoy some woof-content if ur down to try a little

[Enchant]

You want to say i ruin fun for you

[Cephrir]

it's the lack of success that might change

[Cephrir]

on the other hand i do have to admit the claims tell a story with a seemingly obvious solution

[Enchant]

on the other hand i do have to admit the claims tell a story with a seemingly obvious solution

Surprise me

[Cephrir]

is masons + BG + neapolitan + vig too much power

what could scum have to balance that

[Cephrir]

on the other hand i do have to admit the claims tell a story with a seemingly obvious solution

Surprise me

i mean your claim fits with NM's claim and brickwall's claim seems sort of silly

[Cephrir]

is it even worth wondering whether the masons are real

[Enchant]

You forgot psychologist.

[Cephrir]

Scum jailkeeper??

[Cephrir]

You forgot psychologist.

No I didn't

[Enchant]

I got pedited

[Cephrir]

Even night psychologist can't even get a false positive on the vig unless he holsters

It doesn't make sense

[Enchant]

Well i see some chain in fact that all roles are suck.

Well expect for masons and vig.

[T3]

i think the brickwall's claim is the most likely to be fake