In post 3278, Drixx wrote:
Oh and there's also the chance that Black and PB are scum together. Assuming they are scum and they can get town roped today and get a kill through tonight, then Black can claim to have passed it along to someone who claims something else already and that gets a "mislim" tomorrow as well, and then another night kill ... I believe that would be LYLO, assuming 4 scum.
I'm pretty busy at work today ... would appreciate responses.
For what it's worth ... what Black and PB just did is the kind of play that appeals to me as scum. Make the town think I'm conftown (or very nearly so) and run the table.
Did you really just try to say "Occam's Razor" in response to me pointing out that it could be a (very good, if so) scum gambit? If we consider them conftown and then do what people naturally do and follow their lead, they literally get a free pass to LYLO from this claim.
Yes I said occam’s razor
Is it possible that it’s a scum gambit? Yes.
Is it likely that it’s a scum gambit? Hell no
"I used to think you had this elegant-trolly, minimalist playstyle. Then I realized the playstyle is ~Lazy~
The true enlightenment was realizing that they are the same thing."
~fferyllt
"who the fuck fakeclaims Tracker like that
WHO THE FUCK DOES THAT"
~Alisae
In post 3319, Thestatusquo wrote:You are saying here that you find most meta analysis to be pretty poor across the board. I didn't get any of that vibe from you at all in response to pink balls case. You called it the best thing that had been posted in the thread so far I think. If your view of meta is that one should be skeptical of meta and that many applications of it are bad, I would have expected to see some of that cropping up in how you approached the meta case on dragoneater. But it didn't you just called it great and voted for it right away and it seemed to be the basis for your entire read on dragoneater on day 1.
Are you really telling me you don't see dissonance between those two positions?
I did not think Pink Ball's usage of meta was bad. I thought it was very good. Personal tells, different across games, correlation based on alignment. I didn't fact-check the case but the theory was everything that a meta read needs to be.
I can understand how you could have a problem with me stating general skepticism with how most people use meta but then not question Pink Ball's use of meta. The reason Pink Ball's case was different was because he didn't do any of the stuff that is usually done with bad meta cases. Most importantly, he was looking for something behavioural from the person he was analysing that would actually indicate that the player was scum and had justification for believing this game fell strongly into the scum category.
But it feels like you attacked FA yesterday and backed off when FA towntold and then attacked Titus today and then backed off when there was no traction and then attacked dunn and then backed off when there was neither traction and they towntold. Because you went through some slots, slots like FA and I went down a little bit. It seems like it could be something that might happen to scum picking targets they don't want to follow through with? I guess
In post 3278, Drixx wrote:
Oh and there's also the chance that Black and PB are scum together. Assuming they are scum and they can get town roped today and get a kill through tonight, then Black can claim to have passed it along to someone who claims something else already and that gets a "mislim" tomorrow as well, and then another night kill ... I believe that would be LYLO, assuming 4 scum.
I'm pretty busy at work today ... would appreciate responses.
For what it's worth ... what Black and PB just did is the kind of play that appeals to me as scum. Make the town think I'm conftown (or very nearly so) and run the table.
Did you really just try to say "Occam's Razor" in response to me pointing out that it could be a (very good, if so) scum gambit? If we consider them conftown and then do what people naturally do and follow their lead, they literally get a free pass to LYLO from this claim.
Yes I said occam’s razor
Is it possible that it’s a scum gambit? Yes.
Is it likely that it’s a scum gambit? Hell no
this is actually a logical fallacy. You cant decide its likelihood from your perspective.
Think vice versa, if they/one of them are scum then its 100% a scum gambit of a sort
if they are town then they are telling the truth.
so without knowing their alignment you cant decide which is more likelier cause this is a conditional likelihood. you cant just assume people are telling the truth before applying occam's razor. that doesn't work like that.
I'm very happy to vote Titus today but if there's no traction I don't think forcing it through is in my skillset
If I'm pushing people to get votes on them then I'm doing an exceptionally poor job of it
But I think it should be easy to identify that I have zero confidence as either alignment to genuinely push a group of people towards what I want to happen in a game of Mafia, unless I'm really confident that the thing I am pushing is in fact the truth
Your characterisation of me is a scum who is just relentlessly finding possible targets but that doesn't really match with either my personality or the supposed goals of scum!Klick
occams razor applies when two different scenarios without conditions exist that one is likelier than the other. Then you should accept the most likely scenario as the case (this is also with considerations like how town number is more than scum number so all likelihoods are skewed toward town tells). But you can't assume people are town before applying occam razor
I don't see why a theoretical scum!Klick chooses to repeatedly push a bunch of weak leads and then give up on them after getting predictably towny-looking content from each of them
I wanna reread GIF, klick, black and PB. I'm super uncomfortable with how pb and black are acting like each other are conftown and I think GIF is not really showing a hunting spirit.
+ I have some notes about day 1 but I need to actually spend time to sort my thoughts.
Klick why were you townreading dragon eater again in day 1? Like you explicitly dropped a town read on the slot repeatedly. can you elaborate how your read on him developed through the day?
In post 3335, Save The Dragons wrote:
I don't think it was that predictable unless you know they are town ahead of time
Which is what we're assuming with what you've said your read on my play is
You said you thought I was continually looking for people to call scum and push
Unless you think I've been bussing?
In post 3338, Frozen Angel wrote:
Klick why were you townreading dragon eater again in day 1? Like you explicitly dropped a town read on the slot repeatedly. can you elaborate how your read on him developed through the day?
I'll discuss this later, I've been responding here for some time now and would like a break
In post 3335, Save The Dragons wrote:
I don't think it was that predictable unless you know they are town ahead of time
Which is what we're assuming with what you've said your read on my play is
You said you thought I was continually looking for people to call scum and push
Unless you think I've been bussing?
I dunno if this tracks but maybe I'm dumb.
I sr you for other reasons so I'm not uncomfortable to keep my vote on you for the time being
idk what you’re talking about assuming alignment before application.
They’re either telling the truth or not telling the truth.
If they are not telling the truth, then they are either faking the existence of the role or they’re buddies with the real role that they are pretending that it worked.
Faking the existence of the role is very unlikely when they both know that they can’t blame things on rng forever. Visionary is there to fuck with that too and Jingle would’ve caught onto that before scum PB-Black pulls stuff like this.
Given that they both showed lack of coordination on that crumb thingy earlier, both pretending that the role is working as scum is also unlikely. Plus Black asked Titus on same thing before asking PB about the same thing.
So both possible reasons for them lying is unlikely. Then what is likely? Them telling the truth.
"I used to think you had this elegant-trolly, minimalist playstyle. Then I realized the playstyle is ~Lazy~
The true enlightenment was realizing that they are the same thing."
~fferyllt
"who the fuck fakeclaims Tracker like that
WHO THE FUCK DOES THAT"
~Alisae
"I used to think you had this elegant-trolly, minimalist playstyle. Then I realized the playstyle is ~Lazy~
The true enlightenment was realizing that they are the same thing."
~fferyllt
"who the fuck fakeclaims Tracker like that
WHO THE FUCK DOES THAT"
~Alisae
In post 3334, Klick wrote:
I don't see why a theoretical scum!Klick chooses to repeatedly push a bunch of weak leads and then give up on them after getting predictably towny-looking content from each of them
what? You're saying that you are aware that this is what you frequently do as town, so like is the claim here that you don't try to replicate that in your scum game at all?
I don't really believe that?
At a minimum I would expect that you at least try to make your town games and scum games look similar, so I don't know how you could possibly not know what the theoretical benefit is?
In post 3346, GuyInFreezer wrote:
idk what you’re talking about assuming alignment before application.
They’re either telling the truth or not telling the truth.
If they are not telling the truth, then they are either faking the existence of the role or they’re buddies with the real role that they are pretending that it worked.
Faking the existence of the role is very unlikely when they both know that they can’t blame things on rng forever. Visionary is there to fuck with that too and Jingle would’ve caught onto that before scum PB-Black pulls stuff like this.
Given that they both showed lack of coordination on that crumb thingy earlier, both pretending that the role is working as scum is also unlikely. Plus Black asked Titus on same thing before asking PB about the same thing.
So both possible reasons for them lying is unlikely. Then what is likely? Them telling the truth.
we know scum also get the roles they just don't get powers. so how can we be sure one of them isn't scum? or both arent scum and the role is entirely not fake? both are possible scenarios
you cant say its unlikely for them to be scum cause they claimed same role.
but I do agree that they don't seem coordinated so its either both town or one scum IMO too. That still wont make your occams razor not a logical fallacy. they can be town or scum and neither case is more likelier.