if black is less stupid than I am that does make targeting fb a little more likely than I was giving it credit for. Although maybe not because she did still put gif in the poe.
Still think the most likely thing is she targeted klick but if she did forget and target gif that would explain it being randed to fb as well.
I'm surprised that you think 'Black forgot about GIF's commute and targeted him' is plausible but 'Black targeted Firebringer' isn't.
In post 4838, Frozen Angel wrote:
There was no point for an early claim as it doesn't mess with watcher/tracker its just an extra explainable result anyway if those role even exists.
If a tracker targets you they are wasting their action
No, they are getting a result that confirms my claim and theirs. I made sure there was no escape from me claiming this role in day 2. I went on explaining how rare the role is how passive it is, how RB has no effect on it, how not important the role is in general, and I used literal words of the claim and explicitly said I claimed it on my first post of day 2 which doesn't have any other crum in it to be used for fake claims, so my claim would still be irrefutable
and some one else must be with the role today anyway so the existance of this role is not a mystery in a setup with roles that swap hands like this - wont stay a mystery forever.
In post 4779, GuyInFreezer wrote:
We kinda also limmed the jailkeeper so that’s one less interference. I think role magically randomly on FB is kinda too coincidental so I think it’s safe to assume FB is town and got the role?
This!
People are talking about FB randing it as someone in the PoE like that's some particularly likely occurrence.
In post 4779, GuyInFreezer wrote:
We kinda also limmed the jailkeeper so that’s one less interference. I think role magically randomly on FB is kinda too coincidental so I think it’s safe to assume FB is town and got the role?
This!
People are talking about FB randing it as someone in the PoE like that's some particularly likely occurrence.
If FB is town and got the role cause black targetted them, I still think the black night kill means scum were worried he would target a scum and they didn't want her to claim action.
So I think regardless of how FB got the role there is a scum in klick's POE
In post 4779, GuyInFreezer wrote:
We kinda also limmed the jailkeeper so that’s one less interference. I think role magically randomly on FB is kinda too coincidental so I think it’s safe to assume FB is town and got the role?
This!
People are talking about FB randing it as someone in the PoE like that's some particularly likely occurrence.
In post 4857, Frozen Angel wrote:
I still think the black night kill means scum were worried he would target a scum and they didn't want her to claim action.
In post 4856, Dunnstral wrote:
It doesn't confirm your claim because mafia can also be seen targeting the night kill, even if they have that role as their fake claim
The claim doesn't need to be confirmed with any investigation roles. The roles are being swapped hand to hand
only targets/actions need to be confirmed with investigation roles in this setup and they would understand why I was seen targeting even if it would not clear me.
So it doesn't waste the track itself. since track claim would be after me claiming, then it would confirm the tracker player did an action - hence they are town cause they could use the action they randed.
In post 4811, Frozen Angel wrote:
My claim cant be fixed its litteraly on that post in a pretty obvious manner already so I don't think I need to rush it
If it were obvious you wouldn't feel the need to slow roll it
In post 4811, Frozen Angel wrote:
My claim cant be fixed its litteraly on that post in a pretty obvious manner already so I don't think I need to rush it
If it were obvious you wouldn't feel the need to slow roll it
as I said its like that for people since its a rare role.
otherwise, I used the literal words of the role and explained how it is working in multiple posts during day 2 in regard with other actions.
if black is less stupid than I am that does make targeting fb a little more likely than I was giving it credit for. Although maybe not because she did still put gif in the poe.
Still think the most likely thing is she targeted klick but if she did forget and target gif that would explain it being randed to fb as well.
I'm surprised that you think 'Black forgot about GIF's commute and targeted him' is plausible but 'Black targeted Firebringer' isn't.
She literally put him in a list of players she was considering targeting. I think it is pretty clear at that point she HAD forgotten.
In post 4159, GuyInFreezer wrote:
Also please don't use Demon Slayer as an example to dissuade mech.
That setup was at waaaaaaaaaay at the end of the spectrum.
We're not playing in a setup where we have 2 poisoners, 2 redirectors, a bus driver, and some sort of deathproof scum that can kill every town members.
Okay 'commuter'
In post 4161, GuyInFreezer wrote:
Hey I stopped a nightkill, which was far better night actions than what most of the town did.
This was about the demon slayer game not this one
but still, I find it slightly weird that GIF had no reactions about "commuter" mention if that was their role in day 2.
In post 4819, Dunnstral wrote:
Let's clear up mech a little here. Let's assume Firebringer is mafia and is in possession of the Caterer. The role does
not
need to specifically, coincidentally rand onto Firebringer. Any of Firebringer's teammates could have received the Caterer role, and then Firebringer can "switch" fake claims with that mafia player as a more advantageous player inside of the PoE. This increases the odds from 1/15 to hitting Firebringer to something like 4/15 of hitting Firebringer's team.
I'm not saying that this is what happened. I think the most likely explanation is that Firebringer simply received the Caterer normally, and 4/15 is still pretty low odds.
In post 4779, GuyInFreezer wrote:
We kinda also limmed the jailkeeper so that’s one less interference. I think role magically randomly on FB is kinda too coincidental so I think it’s safe to assume FB is town and got the role?
This!
People are talking about FB randing it as someone in the PoE like that's some particularly likely occurrence.
If FB is town and got the role cause black targetted them, I still think the black night kill means scum were worried he would target a scum and they didn't want her to claim action.
So I think regardless of how FB got the role there is a scum in klick's POE
I think killing Black brings scum mechanical utility regardless of whether she's likely to get a guilty or an inno?
Like my immediate thought which I discussed last night was that they killed Black to stop her from confirming someone as town by being present to discuss who she targeted
Stopping a Cop check brings value whether or not it is likely to hit town or scum
In post 4857, Frozen Angel wrote:
I still think the black night kill means scum were worried he would target a scum and they didn't want her to claim action.
This I can get behind.
I disagree that this is conclusive, see above
Scum being in that PoE is still likely by play but not for those reasons and not more than any other particular configuration of 4 scum.
if black is less stupid than I am that does make targeting fb a little more likely than I was giving it credit for. Although maybe not because she did still put gif in the poe.
Still think the most likely thing is she targeted klick but if she did forget and target gif that would explain it being randed to fb as well.
I'm surprised that you think 'Black forgot about GIF's commute and targeted him' is plausible but 'Black targeted Firebringer' isn't.
She literally put him in a list of players she was considering targeting. I think it is pretty clear at that point she HAD forgotten.