[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 13860957 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Open 880 - Normal Idea Mafia - Postgame - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #54 (isolation #4) » Thu Aug 03, 2023 10:11 pm
Postby usesPython »
In post 45, heipizhu4 wrote:
First time playing in a large game, and not_mafia's post looks like a mafia who is trying to act like a jester VOTE: not_mafia
Post
Post #55 (isolation #5) » Thu Aug 03, 2023 10:14 pm
Postby usesPython »
In post 45, heipizhu4 wrote:
First time playing in a large game, and not_mafia's post looks like a mafia who is trying to act like a jester VOTE: not_mafia
Also Jester is explicitly non-normal so even if for some reason they didn't check what roles got posted they'd still know there can't be a Jester. Why do you think NM is scum trying to act like Jester?
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
In post 45, heipizhu4 wrote:
First time playing in a large game, and not_mafia's post looks like a mafia who is trying to act like a jester VOTE: not_mafia
Also Jester is explicitly non-normal so even if for some reason they didn't check what roles got posted they'd still know there can't be a Jester. Why do you think NM is scum trying to act like Jester?
Hey, it's just a rvs joke, i know jester isn't on the deck (nor normal).
Oh we read it as serious
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
Like there's an implicit assumption that the wagon is pure that I think is +scum
VOTE: python
There is no such assumption, implicit or otherwise.
Like, this is a perfectly valid argument as long as one doesn't pay mind on the unsoundness of the premise that it asserts, that I think is +scum
In post 89, heipizhu4 wrote:
I have a feeling I got wagoned whenever I tried to push the game out of rvs as town ...
He's still got his vote on NM from rvs and hasn't pushed anyone, wtf are you talking about
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
Post
Post #105 (isolation #20) » Sat Aug 05, 2023 10:18 am
Postby usesPython »
Like he didn't even ask questions to try to figure out if there's scum motivation for voting him, he just immediately went "yeah ok". How is that not implicitly assuming the wagon is pure?
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
mostly agree with above, though i can see bianco as town who just doesn't like calling things ai
In post 101, biancospino wrote:
There is no such assumption, implicit or otherwise.
Like, this is a perfectly valid argument as long as one doesn't pay mind on the unsoundness of the premise that it asserts, that I think is +scum
bianco's position is that if the assumption is there it's +scum but that the assumption isn't there
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
In post 89, heipizhu4 wrote:
I have a feeling I got wagoned whenever I tried to push the game out of rvs as town ...
Oh, oh, wait, what's this? Is this heip aknowledging they get wagoned every time they do a thing? And so there need not be a specific ai motivation for such a wagon to form? Well then.
Is it town that wagons him or scum? Do scum hop on the wagon or go bat for him? Like wtf is this level 0 read no shit wagons are AI
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
Post
Post #119 (isolation #29) » Sat Aug 05, 2023 12:01 pm
Postby usesPython »
Like all of biancos town!heip theories are like alternate explanation stuff that'd come to mind if you start from the position that heip is town and then run the mindset from there
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
In post 119, usesPython wrote:
Like all of biancos town!heip theories are like alternate explanation stuff that'd come to mind if you start from the position that heip is town and then run the mindset from there
Lol. I'd like to hear what those "theories" of mine might be.
Beside just not accepting that heip's tmi'ing
which, yknow, the onus is really on you on that as far as I'm concerned, you are the one with the claim
That's the entire reason we're calling you scum here:
The town perspective:
I don't know heip's alignment
heip's complaining about getting wagoned but also not voting or pushing or interacting with anyone on his wagon
therefore it's reasonable to assume heip thinks his wagon is pure
therefore the people pushing him could be town
The scum perspective:
I know heip is town
heip's complaining about getting wagoned but also not voting or pushing or interacting with anyone on his wagon
since heip is town that means he thinks the wagon is NAI
therefore I can counterwagon the people pushing him for towncred
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
In post 45, heipizhu4 wrote:
First time playing in a large game, and not_mafia's post looks like a mafia who is trying to act like a jester VOTE: not_mafia
Also Jester is explicitly non-normal so even if for some reason they didn't check what roles got posted they'd still know there can't be a Jester. Why do you think NM is scum trying to act like Jester?
Hey, it's just a rvs joke, i know jester isn't on the deck (nor normal).
In post 45, heipizhu4 wrote:
First time playing in a large game, and not_mafia's post looks like a mafia who is trying to act like a jester VOTE: not_mafia
Also Jester is explicitly non-normal so even if for some reason they didn't check what roles got posted they'd still know there can't be a Jester. Why do you think NM is scum trying to act like Jester?
Hey, it's just a rvs joke, i know jester isn't on the deck (nor normal).
Like there's an implicit assumption that the wagon is pure that I think is +scum
VOTE: python
There is no such assumption, implicit or otherwise.
Like, this is a perfectly valid argument as long as one doesn't pay mind on the unsoundness of the premise that it asserts, that I think is +scum
In post 89, heipizhu4 wrote:
I have a feeling I got wagoned whenever I tried to push the game out of rvs as town ...
He's still got his vote on NM from rvs and hasn't pushed anyone, wtf are you talking about
In post 119, usesPython wrote:
Like all of biancos town!heip theories are like alternate explanation stuff that'd come to mind if you start from the position that heip is town and then run the mindset from there
Lol. I'd like to hear what those "theories" of mine might be.
Beside just not accepting that heip's tmi'ing
which, yknow, the onus is really on you on that as far as I'm concerned, you are the one with the claim
That's the entire reason we're calling you scum here:
The town perspective:
I don't know heip's alignment
heip's complaining about getting wagoned but also not voting or pushing or interacting with anyone on his wagon
therefore it's reasonable to assume heip thinks his wagon is pure
therefore the people pushing him could be town
The scum perspective:
I know heip is town
heip's complaining about getting wagoned but also not voting or pushing or interacting with anyone on his wagon
since heip is town that means he thinks the wagon is NAI
therefore I can counterwagon the people pushing him for towncred
I don't like python's reasoning here, 128 explained the reason why python considered me as scum after 89, however, it didn't explain why they considered players being town for scumreading me in 76. As you know, the same gut feeling on someone doesn't guarantee both of town.
Mindmelds are +town when they come to the same conclusion without us having to say anything.
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
I'm referring to 17, 36, and 39. I only intend to use the first 100 posts for this run.
I never made it explicit in the Setup Information post, so I will clarify now that this was an earlier plan that I did not end up following. This game's setup was rolled using the entire 150-post deck.
That's all.
sus
VOTE: humaneatingmonkey
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
Post
Post #153 (isolation #40) » Sun Aug 06, 2023 9:35 am
Postby usesPython »
Actually no nvm the timing on that would imply that monkey is sk since it was too close together to have read through the entire role list so if our angleshooting is correct they looked up parts of their role. If they were groupscum that would have probably popped up earlier
rn don't really care about sk that much
VOTE: Invis post
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
In post 119, usesPython wrote:
Like all of biancos town!heip theories are like alternate explanation stuff that'd come to mind if you start from the position that heip is town and then run the mindset from there
Lol. I'd like to hear what those "theories" of mine might be.
Beside just not accepting that heip's tmi'ing
which, yknow, the onus is really on you on that as far as I'm concerned, you are the one with the claim
That's the entire reason we're calling you scum here:
The town perspective:
I don't know heip's alignment
heip's complaining about getting wagoned but also not voting or pushing or interacting with anyone on his wagon
therefore it's reasonable to assume heip thinks his wagon is pure
therefore the people pushing him could be town
The scum perspective:
I know heip is town
heip's complaining about getting wagoned but also not voting or pushing or interacting with anyone on his wagon
since heip is town that means he thinks the wagon is NAI
therefore I can counterwagon the people pushing him for towncred
are you having trouble with?
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
Post
Post #157 (isolation #42) » Sun Aug 06, 2023 9:46 am
Postby usesPython »
In post 155, humaneatingmonkey wrote:
you look almost town except i couldn't quite agree with a lot of your reads, so you could be just very good scum! what's your mafia experience
like a bunch of town games, 2 newbie games were we replaced in as scum (1 win/1 loss), and 1 multiball scum game where we replaced out d1
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
Post
Post #159 (isolation #43) » Sun Aug 06, 2023 10:02 am
Postby usesPython »
In post 158, humaneatingmonkey wrote:
comprehension. can you explain it in some other way? you voted him on #106 so I'm mainly interested in what inspired the vote
The 106 vote was like 50% just gut telling us "somethings up", it's only after 113 that it really became a solidified scumread
Basically we think there's a difference between "No you're wrong" and "No you're wrong + vote" in 101 since while the first implies
heip's complaining about getting wagoned but also not voting or pushing or interacting with anyone on his wagon
bianco doesn't think he thinks the wagon is pure but can see how town could come to that conclusion
the second implies
heip's complaining about getting wagoned but also not voting or pushing or interacting with anyone on his wagon
bianco doesn't think he thinks the wagon is pure and doesn't see how town could come to that conclusion
which doesn't seem like a real thought town has and instead seems better explained with the informed mindset of
heip's complaining about getting wagoned but also not voting or pushing or interacting with anyone on his wagon
since heip is town that means he thinks the wagon is NAI
In post 158, humaneatingmonkey wrote:
comprehension. can you explain it in some other way? you voted him on #106 so I'm mainly interested in what inspired the vote
The 106 vote was like 50% just gut telling us "somethings up", it's only after 113 that it really became a solidified scumread
Basically we think there's a difference between "No you're wrong" and "No you're wrong + vote" in 101 since while the first implies
heip's complaining about getting wagoned but also not voting or pushing or interacting with anyone on his wagon
bianco doesn't think he thinks the wagon is pure but can see how town could come to that conclusion
the second implies
heip's complaining about getting wagoned but also not voting or pushing or interacting with anyone on his wagon
bianco doesn't think he thinks the wagon is pure and doesn't see how town could come to that conclusion
which doesn't seem like a real thought town has and instead seems better explained with the informed mindset of
heip's complaining about getting wagoned but also not voting or pushing or interacting with anyone on his wagon
since heip is town that means he thinks the wagon is NAI
Post
Post #164 (isolation #45) » Sun Aug 06, 2023 11:04 am
Postby usesPython »
In post 162, biancospino wrote:
Like this is just a trash argument thou. Borderline only works if we think our mod royally screwed up
I'm going to boldly assume there's no way Alianna posts that announcment, linking to a specific role post in the NIM thread, in rensponse to a player with that role asking questions, and especially not such a player like HEM that would already be in the spotlight for being replaced. Like, no way she's going to modspew stuff that hard
I'm referring to 17, 36, and 39. I only intend to use the first 100 posts for this run.
I never made it explicit in the Setup Information post, so I will clarify now that this was an earlier plan that I did not end up following. This game's setup was rolled using the entire 150-post deck.
That's all.
Emphasis ours. We're not saying HEM is exactly
Serial Killer Rolecop 3-Shot Commuter
, we're saying that if our angleshooting is correct and HEM is scum they can Rolecop or Commute and that it doesn't make sense for them to be groupscum since that would have come up earlier when Merlyn was looking up her role
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
Post
Post #195 (isolation #49) » Sun Aug 06, 2023 10:06 pm
Postby usesPython »
If we drop the explanation of how we got the read it's basically a vibe read that turned into a "Bianco is pocketing heip/setting herself up for towncred after a town!heip flip"
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
Post
Post #204 (isolation #51) » Mon Aug 07, 2023 10:42 am
Postby usesPython »
In post 170, Invisibility wrote:
this is probably a fair assertion in a vacuum but like it feels like tunneling here. It feels weirdly combatative (how do you spell that word)* but I think it's coming from a mindset of finding the evil boogeymonster and trying to find every opportunity to take them down
*so I've just discovered it's combative. Like it's three syllables. What. Did everyone else know this
We can kinda see it?
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
Post
Post #222 (isolation #56) » Mon Aug 07, 2023 9:57 pm
Postby usesPython »
In post 218, heipizhu4 wrote:
Not sure about python, if python enter this game using an alt account, I'd probably townlean them, but 70 makes me hesitate.
What do you mean by this
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
Post
Post #225 (isolation #57) » Tue Aug 08, 2023 12:50 am
Postby usesPython »
In post 224, humaneatingmonkey wrote:
i want to decide that python is town but their progression on bianco either felt like town tunneling and confbiasing or scum trying to justify their push by developing their position on bianco
their withdrawal was not consistent with how confident i thought they would be. reads more like scum whose fire was put out because nobody else was buying their push.
We've gone from hardcore scumreading people to hardcore townreading people in one post for absolute moonlogic reasons as town before (Hi Aureal), if you're reading our alignment off read progression or logic you're gonna be wrong a lot
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
Post
Post #231 (isolation #59) » Tue Aug 08, 2023 1:39 am
Postby usesPython »
In post 228, usesPython wrote:
Aureal quit lurking in the scum PT and go post already
VOTE: Aureal
Like we see you posting in the song contest thread, where the heck are your townposts like
In post 271, Aureal wrote:
I'm guessing that your serious vote is because WhemeStar did confirm, unlike others who were slow to post?
or
In post 280, Aureal wrote:
I have no idea what Rautherdir is trying to say here and I'm starting to wonder if there's really something to the idea that he's trying to muddle things to avoid town getting confirmed innocents from the nightmare.
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more