In post 1045, Merlyn wrote:
I don't feel confident that Snivy is scum, but I would like a Marchi lim even less. I'm concerned to move my vote bc it will leave the Marci wagon in the lead and I like don't trust the wagon on Marci at all. The games most divisive player, Aureal as a pressure vote (I assume, since the reasoning was 'you didn't answer my question', and a player that's about to get replaced for inactivity who joined when asked by Aureal. Like, that's a terrible wagon.
Weird take.
Who do you think I should be voting if you think it's just a pressure vote?
Also "most divisive"?
"Yeah after a point it felt like Aureal was the only one talking sense despite being a goose so I just followed."
-furtiveglance
I still think FL is scummy I don't really buy his excuse that he was faking his entire interaction with me as bait for scum - that was not even close to the impression I got from those posts
In post 1053, SirCakez wrote:
I still think FL is scummy I don't really buy his excuse that he was faking his entire interaction with me as bait for scum - that was not even close to the impression I got from those posts
knowing absolutely nothing about him i assumed it could be true or could not, wasnt realyl sure.
In post 1045, Merlyn wrote:
I don't feel confident that Snivy is scum, but I would like a Marchi lim even less. I'm concerned to move my vote bc it will leave the Marci wagon in the lead and I like don't trust the wagon on Marci at all. The games most divisive player, Aureal as a pressure vote (I assume, since the reasoning was 'you didn't answer my question', and a player that's about to get replaced for inactivity who joined when asked by Aureal. Like, that's a terrible wagon.
Weird take.
Who do you think I should be voting if you think it's just a pressure vote?
Also "most divisive"?
I don't think I made it clear, I meant FL was the most divisive, not you. Sorry!
Speaking of weirdness....Im not going to pick who you should vote for, figure that out yourself lol. I said why I was thinking you made a pressure vote and it's a reasonable take, and I figured you would come in and clarify one way or the other. I don't understand why you're not.
Merlyn, what exactly needs clarification? I'm not sure why you seem to think I can't find marci's hypocritical action and subsequent failure to give any explanations for her actions when questioned by both me and Flavor Leaf to be suspicious enough to be my top suspect. Calling it a pressure vote implies it's not very serious and I'd rather vote elsewhere. And I'm not sure why you'd think that.
"Yeah after a point it felt like Aureal was the only one talking sense despite being a goose so I just followed."
-furtiveglance
In post 1058, Aureal wrote:
Merlyn, what exactly needs clarification? I'm not sure why you seem to think I can't find marci's hypocritical action and subsequent failure to give any explanations for her actions when questioned by both me and Flavor Leaf to be suspicious enough to be my top suspect. Calling it a pressure vote implies it's not very serious and I'd rather vote elsewhere. And I'm not sure why you'd think that.
I could absolutely think that you could find Marci suspicious for that if you had mentioned it at any point. You however said this about about Marci when voting:
In post 916, Aureal wrote:
VOTE: marcistar who hasn't answered me either
In post 918, Aureal wrote:
Penguin, join the Marci wagon, it's fun. We have... Um... Popsicles?
I must be missing the part where you said where you sussed for being hypocritical and not giving any explanations, can you point me to the posts?
In post 1058, Aureal wrote:
Merlyn, what exactly needs clarification? I'm not sure why you seem to think I can't find marci's hypocritical action and subsequent failure to give any explanations for her actions when questioned by both me and Flavor Leaf to be suspicious enough to be my top suspect. Calling it a pressure vote implies it's not very serious and I'd rather vote elsewhere. And I'm not sure why you'd think that.
I could absolutely think that you could find Marci suspicious for that if you had mentioned it at any point. You however said this about about Marci when voting:
In post 916, Aureal wrote:
VOTE: marcistar who hasn't answered me either
In post 918, Aureal wrote:
Penguin, join the Marci wagon, it's fun. We have... Um... Popsicles?
I must be missing the part where you said where you sussed for being hypocritical and not giving any explanations, can you point me to the posts?
I asked her about it in 806. Because that's clearly kinda suspicious. Some of you I'm townreading and wanted to evaluate your reasoning to see if it swayed me on Cakez. That was not.
"Yeah after a point it felt like Aureal was the only one talking sense despite being a goose so I just followed."
-furtiveglance
Can you vote Snivy please? I think Cakez is town here.
why do u think snivys scum then cuz idk nothing pinged me there
He isn't doing anything and cares more about surviving the vote than trying to vote out scum. As opposed to you and Cakez being potential elims today and at least trying to scum hunt. I feel that both of you are townie and slots I can read going forward, and I would rather keep the both of you around.
Can you vote Snivy please? I think Cakez is town here.
why do u think snivys scum then cuz idk nothing pinged me there
He isn't doing anything and cares more about surviving the vote than trying to vote out scum. As opposed to you and Cakez being potential elims today and at least trying to scum hunt. I feel that both of you are townie and slots I can read going forward, and I would rather keep the both of you around.
other than 1057 which was after this can you point to where
hi i've read some of the game already. wanted to clear something up--eliminations are good for town and town-directed kills are good for town. if a townie gets killed with sacrifice they probably would've been eliminated later, and otherwise we get a cop guilty. i feel confident we want to use sacrifice twice this game. maybe there's a catch but we can only go off of the information we have.
we disagree a bit on who's scum, some of us thought that devil were scummy early on but that could be some of drew's confident personality. meow is maybe our biggest scumread tbh, but maybe that's best to address later anyway.
we have no particular desire to eliminate any of the current biggest wagons, so time to read up i guess.
If you want a full case, I don't have one. Of the leading wagons you're the lowest in my reads, and I know I can work with Marci and Cakez going forward. I don't think you've done much of anything and your votes have been lifeless all game.
In post 1067, Infinity 324 wrote:
hi i've read some of the game already. wanted to clear something up--eliminations are good for town and town-directed kills are good for town. if a townie gets killed with sacrifice they probably would've been eliminated later, and otherwise we get a cop guilty. i feel confident we want to use sacrifice twice this game. maybe there's a catch but we can only go off of the information we have.
In post 1069, Roden wrote:
If you want a full case, I don't have one. Of the leading wagons you're the lowest in my reads, and I know I can work with Marci and Cakez going forward. I don't think you've done much of anything and your votes have been lifeless all game.
In post 1067, Infinity 324 wrote:
hi i've read some of the game already. wanted to clear something up--eliminations are good for town and town-directed kills are good for town. if a townie gets killed with sacrifice they probably would've been eliminated later, and otherwise we get a cop guilty. i feel confident we want to use sacrifice twice this game. maybe there's a catch but we can only go off of the information we have.
THIS IS WHAT IVE BEEN SAYINGGGGGGGG
tbh im fine with replacing intellegencia with sacrifice but like, nobody wants to do that
