In post 947, DkKoba wrote:In post 631, BlueSnakelet wrote: This isn't an Ace Attorney game. We can't catch scum by just pointing out contradictions. In fact, scum creating a fake case on someone else would provably be more careful than a townie speaking their honest thoughts.
Koba picking an old game to analyze is at worst NAI.
Koba's reaction to being cornered and outnumbered was to get frustated and argue in circles, which is understandable. Ranger said at some point that Koba looks "argumentative, not frustrated". I disagree with this completely. Koba's side of the argument was heated from really early.
I was going to suspect Ranger, but her flaking out of her suspicion on Koba took me off guard. She was the main driving force of Koba's wagon, and I struggle to find a good reason why she would jump off. If a long time had passed since the start of the argument I could understand, but most of it happened overnight and most people weren't even on.
I doubt Koba and Ranger are scum together. The meta reason was too elaborated to be faked. And they walked out of the debate practically buddies, which is bad theater.In post 748, BlueSnakelet wrote:I'm not confident in it, but if I had to choose one it would be Happy. He posted a moderate amount of posts while saying nothing about the game.In post 743, Dannflor wrote: bluesnakelet do you have any scum readsIn post 751, BlueSnakelet wrote:You mean, for Happy? He's barely in the game.In post 750, Dannflor wrote: is there a reason you aren't voting right now, blue
If he continues not saying anything, he'll just get executed as a hostage. If he doesn't die, then I'll have a real reason to vote for him.In post 754, BlueSnakelet wrote:I'm not. If he is really scum, then he wont be.killed by Schadd.In post 752, Doctor Drew wrote:Well this is terrible.In post 751, BlueSnakelet wrote:You mean, for Happy? He's barely in the game.In post 750, Dannflor wrote: is there a reason you aren't voting right now, blue
If he continues not saying anything, he'll just get executed as a hostage. If he doesn't die, then I'll have a real reason to vote for him.
Why so certain they will be killed by Schadd?In post 758, BlueSnakelet wrote:I haven't payed any attention to ofrhz so far.In post 756, Dannflor wrote:I mean, for anyoneIn post 751, BlueSnakelet wrote:You mean, for Happy? He's barely in the game.In post 750, Dannflor wrote: is there a reason you aren't voting right now, blue
If he continues not saying anything, he'll just get executed as a hostage. If he doesn't die, then I'll have a real reason to vote for him.
Are any of the wagons enticing to you? You haven't said anything about ofrhz I don't thinkIn post 762, BlueSnakelet wrote: Ok, I paid attention to ofrhz. Mostly the things It's Highness pointed out in #472.
I read Ranger and ofrhz combined ISOs. From #15 to #91 it's all Ranger (including her readlists). From #97 to #112 it's all ofrhz talking about things other than Ranger. The next post from either of them is ofrhz's "serious" vote on Ranger, which he later explains was because of Ranger's readlists.
I agree, this development makes 0 sense. ofrhz voted without a reason, and then invented a reason when questioned.
VOTE: ofrhzi dunno mate half the iso is pretty transparently town to me, is lowposting a crime?In post 763, BlueSnakelet wrote:Well... For starters, you may coment on the Koba VS Ranger dabate or it's immediate fallout. That'd put you up to speed.In post 761, iamveryhappy wrote: Oh no! I might get killed as a hostage! Obligatory shitpost coming up.
hello
Bluesnakelet
what do ya want from me
gonna be hilarious if bluesnek flips mafia then hehehe