It is more likely I am living a solipsistic existence in a simulation than it is that the last 3 pages are somehow written by real independent agents who do not exist solely to mess with me
One thing that I can say about me losing my mind is that no one has pointed out that this is a Normal game, which I emphasized in 4 different places, and Beholder is a non-Normal role.
This is only 2% of my overall confusion but contextually it makes the other 98% so much worse.
still going strong in my "both millers are lying" theory
2-shot tracker + 1-shot cop + whatever cakez is is *probably* a fine setup on its own
I will straight up disregard all reason if you have a PR dream again. You can come back and be like, “I dreamt that Locke is a N2 Bulletproof Multitasking Cop and Self-Targeting Doctor,” and I will go, “Okay, Locke kill it is then.”
I will straight up disregard all reason if you have a PR dream again. You can come back and be like, “I dreamt that Locke is a N2 Bulletproof Multitasking Cop and Self-Targeting Doctor,” and I will go, “Okay, Locke kill it is then.”
In post 87, fireisredsir wrote:
bell repeatedly insisting on "you decided to get upset" is tilting me so much and im not even in the game
but i think it's just awful word choice because he doesn't seem to think he's saying anything wrong?
Yep, I was saying it wrong.
I meant that how we respond to our emotions is in our control.
“I’m upset”
1. Thinking: “I should carefully figure out what I’m upset about and approach the problem effectively if I can and in my best interests in alignment with my morals and values”.
2. Not thinking: “i’mma punch it” *punches*
Luke was forced to claim.
They decided that rather than investigate quietly to out their result. With a conclusion that the player is probably town. I don’t know why he would assume that.
Dunn decided to protect Luke who could be scum, fake claiming then someone else.
It’s unclear or rather I don’t remember what his read of Luke was.
Both of them do calculated lying about their roles in abilities in the past so it’s hard to take either of their claims at face value. Even if they’re both town. As town they’ll lie to benefit their win con.
As scum they’ll lie because they’re scum.
I find the idea that Dunn would lie about visiting Luke as town to cover for Luke to be totally alien unless they know they’re town. Or they’re scum partners.
I think it would be -ev conventionally for scum Luke to have Dunn scum cover for them without the plausibility of deniability by having some sort of role that could actually detect Dunn’s activity.
Unless they guessed Dunn was a PR but I dunno why.
I also don’t know why Luke decided to track Dunn.
Likewise, I’m not clear on what the miller is for as trackers still get an accurate result if they check millers right?
I’m trying so very hard to articulate my difficulty reading and also trying to figure out sircakez.
One minute he’s dead certain the next he’s not.
One minute his scope and field of vision are so narrow that he clearly has blinders and then he backs up into something more reasonable, and I’m not sure if they’re responding to people’s reactions or if they’re just thinking on it more and branching out from there.
Their suggestion to limit kills to masons or vanilla’s is reasonable but it also conflicts with my sense that they’re narrowing the pool with artificial rules which I tend to associate with scum.
