Datisi's University [game over!]

[Datisi]

vote count 4.final

with 13 votes in play, it took 7 to make a decision. week 4 ended.

dismissal

GuiltyLion [7]:

Alisae, Titus, furtiveglance, NorwegianboyEE, WhemeStar, KatyKimFanClub, Enchant

[HAMMER]

furtiveglance [4]:

Ranger, Doctor Drew, GuiltyLion, RCEnigma

Titus [1]:

Dusa

not voting [1]:

osuka

mod notes

Dusa is v/la saturday-sunday.
if you're sending me a PM related to this game, please make sure to include "uni", "university", or "datisi" in the subject of the PM!
this is a mod note.

flavour

[Datisi]

flavour

hey, i passed that one bullshit exam! i might even have the willpower to start writing these things soon

[Datisi]

GuiltyLion has been dismissed week 4. he was a

study partner

, aligned with

the psychology club

.

Spoiler: role PM

study partner -

the psychology club

"don't sweat it! if you're busy, of course i will help you study!"

---

welcome,

GuiltyLion

! you are a

study partner

, aligned with

the psychology club

!

[day abilities]:

during each week, you may choose how much time you're going to spend studying that week, ranging from 0% of your time to 100% of your time. if you do not submit anything, you will default to studying 100% of the time. at the end of the week, you will receive [100 minus time spent studying] TPR points.

[night abilities]:

study session [cost: 40 TPR points; +20 for each additional usage]

- during the weekend, target a player. assuming no interference with your action, your target will be protected from all direct expulsion attempts, and any of their actions will be blocked. this action will only succeed if your target is

not

vanilla.

you win once all threats to the psychology club have been removed, and at least one member of the psychology club is still in the game.

the main thread is here. please confirm by replying to this PM with your role name and alignment,

and by answering the following question: during which game phase do players submit their time spent studying?

the workweek is over, it is now weekend 4. monday deadline is frozen at 48 hours until a replacement for Doctor Drew is found.

[Datisi]

Cephrir replaces Doctor Drew.

monday in (expired on 2023-09-25 01:15:00).

[Datisi]

flavour

nevermind! i'm back to having to rush out a paper by tuesday! sorry!

[Datisi]

Enchant has been expelled weekend 4. he was a

burned out psychologists' child

, aligned with

himself

.

Spoiler: role PM

burned out psycologists' child -

self-aligned

"man, i know my parents want me to also be a psychologist, and i don't want to disappoint them, but i'm just so tired! if only something were to happen that wasn't my fault..."

---

welcome,

Enchant

! you are a

burned out psychologists' child

, aligned with

yourself

!

[night abilities]:

• all abilities that ever target you, other than expulsions, will fail.
  
• you know that
  [REDACTED]
  
  
• you know that
  [REDACTED]
  
  
• during the weekend, target a player. assuming no interference with your action, that player will receive a message of your choosing. they will be aware the message came from another player in the game. you may only use this ability twice during the game.
  
• during the weekend, using this ability. assuming no interference with your action, the moderator will post an anonymous message of your choosing once the weekend ends. you may only use this ability twice during the game.
  
• you may not use both of those abilities during the same weekend.

you win once you are expelled. you lose if you are voted out, or if the game ends while you are alive.

if you are expelled, two players will be voted out the next week. if you are voted out, professors' pets will be able to expel one extra person that weekend.

the main thread is here. please confirm by replying to this PM with your role name and alignment,

and by answering the following question: during which game phase do players submit their time spent studying?

Enchant has fulfilled his win-condition, and exited the game in victory.

due to Enchant getting expelled, there will be two dismissals this week.

after one player is voted out, they will flip, after which the deadline and votes will be reset.

monday has come. it is now week 5.

[Datisi]

vote count 5.00

with 11 votes in play, it takes 6 to make a decision. week 5 (part 1) ends in (expired on 2023-10-09 02:00:00).

dismissal

not voting [11]:

WhemeStar, Titus, Ranger, furtiveglance, osuka, KatyKimFanClub, NorwegianboyEE, RCEnigma, Cephrir, Dusa, Alisae

mod notes

if you're sending me a PM related to this game, please make sure to include "uni", "university", or "datisi" in the subject of the PM!
this is a mod note.

flavour

[Ranger]

So, I

might

have lied about copping Enchant...

...or being a power role at all, for that matter. :P

[Ranger]

So, I

might

have lied about copping Enchant...

...or being a power role at all, for that matter. :P

For clarity,

Enchant has been expelled weekend 4. he was a

burned out psychologists' child

, aligned with

himself

.

[night abilities]:

• all abilities that ever target you, other than expulsions, will fail.
  
• during the weekend, target a player. assuming no interference with your action,
  that player will receive a message of your choosing
  . they will be aware the message came from another player in the game. you may only use this ability twice during the game.

you win once you are expelled

. you lose if you are voted out, or if the game ends while you are alive.

if you are expelled, two players will be voted out the next week. if you are voted out, professors' pets will be able to expel one extra person that weekend.

Enchant messaged me N3. He fullclaimed his entire role to me. Being 3p, his wincon being Unjester, how we'd have a double-elimination if he did get killed by scum, and how he was ascetic. He also claimed scum could spend scum points to learn about his role.

I need to figure out a paraphrase for his whole message. He caused me to pivot away from my originally-planned fakeclaim.

I was

planning

on fakeclaiming a 1x cop costing 150%, who could turn the action into a daycop with 100 extra points spent. Then, I'd fakeclaim D4 and get a target to fake an innocent on. When Enchant messaged me N3, I realized I had to pivot.

If people want my

real

role I can claim it if there's a need.

I'm not claiming anything until

at minimum

furtive is yeeted though.

Ideally also Titus.

VOTE: furtiveglance

[Ranger]

So, I

might

have lied about copping Enchant...

...or being a power role at all, for that matter. :P

If people want my

real

role I can claim it if there's a need. I'm not claiming anything until

at minimum

furtive is yeeted though.

Sometimes in my ADHD I forget things, oops. (Consequence of attending to this game mid-date.)


I almost typed out 'my real role is VT' in 4508, because I claimed it in 4507. I

forgot

I had actually

claimed

in 4507, and then decided it'd be better to keep it ambiguous, so changed it to 'will claim real role when needed'.

To be clear, yes, I'm a VT. I

did

prepare a cop fakeclaim from my first post. Enchant caused me to modify it from 1x cop which could be boosted with 100% to a daycop, into a 1x cop which could be boosted to be strongman, yet I was always planning on fakeclaiming

some

variant of cop.

I should work on a paraphrase of Enchant's message to prove he did send to me N3.

[Titus]

I knew Ranger was lying. I knew she was survivalistic. Now, we know she's not 3p.

So the question becomes: Is Ranger scum that couldn't expel because she was blocked when RCE investigated her or is she town pissed off that she was caught lying?

Her reads were still survivalistic as fuck but she can't be 3p like I thought. So I'd like input from Ali and NorwegianboyEE.

I'd also like furtiveglance to claim his result (if any).

[KatyKimFanClub]

Hardclaim Mason.

[Titus]

Frankly Ranger, I believe Enchant messaged you but I won't believe the contents of the message unless independently verified. You've been lying all game but you expect us to believe you

now

?

[osuka]

ranger i still believe youre full of shit with these claims and confident that you're intentionally obscuring your progression behind an extremely unorthodox playstyle, but i think it's inarguable that furtive is the vote here
VOTE: furtiveglance

[Titus]

Kkfc, thoughts on Ranger's fakeclaim?

[osuka]

titus, why don't you flex your vca muscles and show us who furtive's partner is

[Titus]

I'm hitting the road and likely start trial on Monday. I'll be watching the thread tonight if I finish work fast enough.

[KatyKimFanClub]

Kkfc, thoughts on Ranger's fakeclaim?

Uh, my initial thoughts are based on the cases where Ranger is town or scum
1) Town: Seems like Enchant messaged Ranger (as Ranger claims) and they conspired to make a situation where Enchant was the scum kill. This simplifies the game for town and also lets Enchant win. It makes sense and also sort of explains how Ranger kept claiming that their claims lined up with D1 play when it only kind of did.
2) Scum: Enchant messaged Ranger (as Ranger claims) and Ranger realized that killing Enchant might set up a scum win the next day/night (mis-elim, mis-elim), double kill?

[KatyKimFanClub]

I think it's probably town though. If Enchant messages Ranger, and Ranger is scum, there is no incentive for Ranger to actually kill Enchant, right?

[KatyKimFanClub]

Ok so apparently it's 10-3 not 9-4 as I imagined, so scum can't win today even with the double elim? Unless we are somehow in double bonus night kill territory?

[osuka]

i think it's unlikely that scum wins today unless this goes completely badly

[osuka]

an example of this not going completely badly is to start by voting off furtive, which would decrease the number of mafia-aligned players in the game by exactly one

[Titus]

I think it's probably town though. If Enchant messages Ranger, and Ranger is scum, there is no incentive for Ranger to actually kill Enchant, right?

Ranger discredits the theory that she's 3p. There is motive there.

[KatyKimFanClub]

I think it's probably town though. If Enchant messages Ranger, and Ranger is scum, there is no incentive for Ranger to actually kill Enchant, right?

Ranger discredits the theory that she's 3p. There is motive there.

Well, this is only true if RCE is also scum, right?

[KatyKimFanClub]

This seems sketchy for a scum!Ranger, scum!RCE team unless they were unaware that Enchant dying would trigger a double-elim situation.