In the background and present but not memorable, but when you read the actual posts you see stuff that technically counts as content even though your brain skips over itIn post 524, Black wrote:I'm interested in this read. Go onIn post 523, usesPython wrote: Like Black the overall vibe feels like the first newbie game we played with you where you were scum
-A
Ok. What prompted this read?In post 525, usesPython wrote: In the background and present but not memorable, but when you read the actual posts you see stuff that technically counts as content even though your brain skips over it
?In post 526, usesPython wrote: It falls off into full on lurking after the 200th-ish post but for the parts where he's actually playing that's the vibe I'm getting
-A
wdym?In post 527, Black wrote:Ok. What prompted this read?In post 525, usesPython wrote: In the background and present but not memorable, but when you read the actual posts you see stuff that technically counts as content even though your brain skips over it
What in particular made you feel this way?In post 529, usesPython wrote:wdym?In post 527, Black wrote:Ok. What prompted this read?In post 525, usesPython wrote: In the background and present but not memorable, but when you read the actual posts you see stuff that technically counts as content even though your brain skips over it
-A
The whole ISO? I don't really get thisIn post 530, Black wrote:What in particular made you feel this way?In post 529, usesPython wrote:wdym?In post 527, Black wrote:Ok. What prompted this read?In post 525, usesPython wrote: In the background and present but not memorable, but when you read the actual posts you see stuff that technically counts as content even though your brain skips over it
-A
I'm saying Tim this game feels like Black in Newbie 2111In post 532, Black wrote: I'm trying to figure out if this read is real or if you're throwing it out now to discredit me after I voted for you
Like if you've felt this way about me why did you wait until now to say something?
I know you've already acknowledged your error, but can you PLEASE make an effort to use the correct pronouns? It's actually really irritating.In post 489, Aneninen wrote: As far as I remember Comet's posts, I can give him a townread, too.
Pocket attemptIn post 495, Gimli wrote: do your thing and let me sheep you
Aw, that really sucks. Sorry to hear that.In post 496, Black wrote: Alright alright I'll get up. I lost my job yesterday so I'm just slightly depressed
I disagree with this, this is how town players often play. If you look at my own play for instance, I went from townreading to scumreading to townreading Comet a bunch. It is entirely believable that Python would vote Gimli (in RVS!) and then think he's townie.In post 499, Kittiesecret wrote: In post 48, usesPython wrote:
> Gimli's pretty obvtown
do you think that tho you voted for him twice thus far? this felt like a distraction
That's freaking hilarious.In post 499, Kittiesecret wrote: felt "mansplainy" and deceptive.
That game is not 7 years old, it's about a month old.In post 499, Kittiesecret wrote: In post 204, usesPython wrote:
Are people really metaing 7 year old games?
I found this interesting when they then went on to do the same thing...
Yes and no. I know some AI things happened, but I also know that I don't really care about any of them to be fully honest? You know how everyone was complaining about nobody being scummy? It was because no one WAS being scummy. The game didn't have anything scum indicative happening. You remember that I had to force a scumread on PAGE SEVEN? Not page 2. Not page 3. PAGE SEVEN. I was forcing a scumread because there was nothing to scumread.In post 501, Black wrote: > In post 442, DragonEater70 wrote:
> Like I don't think anything actually alignment indicative happened before page 16 if I'm being honest, and you won't be getting any associatives from anything before that.
Do you actually believe this?
Day 1 in micros tend to be 20-50 pages long depending on the playerlistIn post 543, TimmerRC wrote: Quick follow up to my earlier post about being overwhelmed... I had signed up for this thinking it was in a way a newbie game, which to my mind meant it would be a bit more low key, is.... this... what is considered simple and straightforward on this site, lol?
Like, the level of posting and the sheer amount of words in what is essentially nothing? Is this a quieter game by the site's standards?
Okay, good to know. I'm feeling smothered, lol. But, it just means taking a step back and reframing the reality of the game in my head and then re engaging, so tonight I'll begin that, I have no interest in bowing out.In post 545, usesPython wrote:Day 1 in micros tend to be 20-50 pages long depending on the playerlistIn post 543, TimmerRC wrote: Quick follow up to my earlier post about being overwhelmed... I had signed up for this thinking it was in a way a newbie game, which to my mind meant it would be a bit more low key, is.... this... what is considered simple and straightforward on this site, lol?
Like, the level of posting and the sheer amount of words in what is essentially nothing? Is this a quieter game by the site's standards?
-A
I'm just answering this part right now (it's late here).In post 537, DragonEater70 wrote: I know you've already acknowledged your error, but can you PLEASE make an effort to use the correct pronouns? It's actually really irritating.
I'm not entirely sure what this is saying. Yes, town!Comet would react this way but also scum!Comet would react this way too potentially so picking up on a mistake and pushing it is scummy? I'm not saying that scum!Comet could not also point out a mistake you've made and push you over it - I'm saying that the act itself of pointing out you've done something that looks scummy and pushing you over it is not something you can really say is 'scummy behaviour' given you've also acknowledged that it's understandable why it would seem that way (if I've interpreted your posts right?).In post 470, Afrayed Knott wrote: So having read what has transpired here since my last post I do acknowledge and accept why Dragon and Comet have picked up on on my reactions and more pointedly my posts and deemed them scummy. But there is a flip side to the argument as I see it, when you consider it was my side of the argument. I'm not discounting the theory presented around why town Comet would react the way in which she did, but then how would scum Comet react? I'm not sure, as I have very little to go on her. What is her play style like as both town and scum? And having never played her before how could I be held up for not trusting her. Although yes the reasoning is sound, for example in the light of day (literally) most would pick it up, I would too, but regardless of alignment. So why wouldn't a player with experience not pick it up regardless of which camp they sit in?
Think it through logically. The further a game goes on, the less room there is for mistakes/misexecutes. Tactically speaking you do not want people you have a lot of trouble reading to be there in the final three because you're going to be in a lot of trouble as you'll have to now try and read them to judge if they're town or scum and getting it wrong is game over. I'm not saying you being a hard real is the sole reason for me wanting a lim on you since that'd be pretty weak reasoning, but if I have a set of people I feel I'm more able to read/get a grasp of then yeah there is incentive for me to want to keep those people around as opposed to people I cannot read, right?In post 471, Afrayed Knott wrote: This I just don't get, why would you lim someone as they are a hard read, you are a hard read to me, as are most as I am fairly new to the game, even if you count my last forage into it. To me the only reason I can possibly come up with as to why you would say this is I might be close to the truth with regards to your alignment.