![Cool :cool:](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
Trying to get someone, anyone, to react to it in any way other than not understanding tbh.
mostlyIn post 230, Crescent wrote: is this normal for them
This is kind of how the early game works.In post 230, Crescent wrote: He feels like a topic that exists for the sake of being a topic.
I like this thought progression. Drew's ISO is essentially... act exasperated at the number of posts, add pressure on existing suspects, and then question people that remove pressure off said suspects. I think I would be ok with a Drew vote depending on what Roden does when he returns to the threadIn post 230, Crescent wrote: Odd sequence: Titus votes Black. Drew votes Black. Roden calls Titus and Black both town, and Gob says he doesn't like Roden. Drew then responds to Gob saying he also doesn't like Roden. Shortly after this, Black votes Roden. Titus changes her mind and votes Roden, and Drew immediately asks her why she's backing off on Black.
What Drew never provides however, are his own reasons to suspect Black or Rodon to begin with. He just sheeps people onto both of them, and then he questions why the first person he sheeped changed her mind. It doesn't feel like a natural town progression at all.
VOTE: Doctor Drew
This made me cackleIn post 230, Crescent wrote: Speaking of Gob, they feel like they're on crack, is this normal for them?
Somehow "pushing things" got deleted hereIn post 233, Black wrote: I agree that Drew seems to be drifting through D1 while still
In my experience scum tend to try and hide it similarly to how he would be doing it here. By acknowledging it yet still trying to push their agenda here and thereIn post 235, Dunnstral wrote: Seems a bit too easy for Doctor Drew to be mafia. They aren't exactly hiding that they aren't doing much.
I'm confused...Drew never voted Roden, so I wouldn't say he "sheeps people onto both of them". And considering he stayed on Black, even though he expressed the fact he didn't like Roden I don't see a problem in asking why someone else backed off their scumread? If Drew had moved from Black to Roden I could see your case here, but it seems like you're trying to make a case out of something that never happened.In post 230, Crescent wrote: Odd sequence: Titus votes Black. Drew votes Black. Roden calls Titus and Black both town, and Gob says he doesn't like Roden. Drew then responds to Gob saying he also doesn't like Roden. Shortly after this, Black votes Roden. Titus changes her mind and votes Roden, and Drew immediately asks her why she's backing off on Black.
What Drew never provides however, are his own reasons to suspect Black or Rodon to begin with. He just sheeps people onto both of them, and then he questions why the first person he sheeped changed her mind. It doesn't feel like a natural town progression at all.
What do you thinkIn post 239, Titus wrote: How does a Drew Roden team look?
Doctor Drew and Pisskop are town here. For sure.In post 223, Doctor Drew wrote:What about me? Who has done fuck all this game so far?In post 217, davesaz wrote: Sorry I'm not trying to be difficult. That's actually me trying to be utterly open about what I'm trying to say.
I haven't said it this game yet, I'm an old guy who tends to virtually whack people I think are doing unproductive/bad things. In this case gob and to a lesser extent Dann, though I must admit it is a lot more subtle than voting someone for intentionally pagetopping.
I haven't decided who I like for the next vote.
Seems like an excuse to me davesaz.In post 226, davesaz wrote: 6 players with 10 or fewer posts is not enough to go on. It's a target rich environment, but not the right kind of targets.
Dunnstral you havent been doing too much either. What's that about?In post 235, Dunnstral wrote: Seems a bit too easy for Doctor Drew to be mafia. They aren't exactly hiding that they aren't doing much.
He's had a towny state of mind thoever.In post 238, Crescent wrote: The problem stems from the fact that his only source of "content" in the game: When he's coasting off of other people's scumreads in the same sequence. His vote on Black was naked and never explained later, quickly following a post where he complained about the activity. His response to Gob saying he didn't like Roden was again naked, in the very next post after Gob, and never explained later. He then deflects his own lack of content by questioning Titus, when he's already indicated he believes she moved the vote from one person he dislikes and onto another.
He has done nothing to suggest he had a genuine read on Black or Roden. The fact that his vote didn't move from Black to Roden doesn't change this.
Admitting that you're not doing anything is like the easiest thing for scum to do and it shows he's aware of it and that it might look scummy. This could come from town or scum so I'm not sure why you are ruling out one of the optionsIn post 243, gob wrote: He's had a towny state of mind thoever.
The way he randomly responded to davesaz mentioning they didnt do anything. The only person who goes out of there way to say something like that is town. A scum would do something else before that.In post 244, Black wrote:Admitting that you're not doing anything is like the easiest thing for scum to do and it shows he's aware of it and that it might look scummy. This could come from town or scum so I'm not sure why you are ruling out one of the optionsIn post 243, gob wrote: He's had a towny state of mind thoever.
Scum that wants to emphasize that they are doing nothing in order to continue doing nothing might do it. I'm not saying this makes Drew scum but I don't see how it clears him tbhIn post 245, gob wrote:The way he randomly responded to davesaz mentioning they didnt do anything. The only person who goes out of there way to say something like that is town. A scum would do something else before that.In post 244, Black wrote:Admitting that you're not doing anything is like the easiest thing for scum to do and it shows he's aware of it and that it might look scummy. This could come from town or scum so I'm not sure why you are ruling out one of the optionsIn post 243, gob wrote: He's had a towny state of mind thoever.
Looks like someone has never seen my scum game.In post 238, Crescent wrote: The problem stems from the fact that his only source of "content" in the game: When he's coasting off of other people's scumreads in the same sequence. His vote on Black was naked and never explained later, quickly following a post where he complained about the activity. His response to Gob saying he didn't like Roden was again naked, in the very next post after Gob, and never explained later. He then deflects his own lack of content by questioning Titus, when he's already indicated he believes she moved the vote from one person he dislikes and onto another.
He has done nothing to suggest he had a genuine read on Black or Roden. The fact that his vote didn't move from Black to Roden doesn't change this.