Here:In post 1075, DragonEater70 wrote:Can you explain why town!me implies scum!purple? I am like totally failing to see the rationale here. If you are town explaining this rationale might help me see your thought process.In post 1016, Pavowski wrote:I stated it before but I am gonna be gobsmacked if scum!Kyo leads a relentless charge like that on Lap. She never wavered, even a little bit -- that's a hell of a gambit for scum.In post 1013, Flavor Leaf wrote: Kyouko, HPE, Hu Tao?
Of course, me being surprised by a thing is hardly a reason to think it couldn't happen.
More likely Hu Tao, HPE, Geraint but Geraint's still basically a zero info slot
If I'm going to reconsider town!Dragon I need to reconsider scum!Purple, I was close to ruling that out
I posted this when I first started seriously considering you as scum and exploring the idea in the open. Looking at your interactions with Purple I came to the above. Unfortunately most of those combinations favored, and made sense in a context of, you being scum.In post 870, Pavowski wrote: I promise I'm not deliberately spamming the thread, but I hate wall posting. Between my last post and some notes I took at the end of d1 when I got home and the thread was locked have me really considering Purple/Dragon as two of the three scum (It would be 3 in a normal, right?). And given they know each other IRL...
scum!Purple / scum!Dragon works
town!Purple / scum!Dragon works
scum!Purple / town!Dragon doesn't work
town!Purple / town!Dragon could work but that means I have to find 3 scum in HPE, Kyouko, Joy, CW, Gera, Hu Tao. Possible? Yes. Likely? Feels like no.
Purple, what's your take on Dragon right now?
I'm not, that would be silly, I was just responding to you because that's, y'know, conversationalIn post 1066, DragonEater70 wrote:Thing is you are the one omgusingIn post 986, Pavowski wrote:Dragon you seem to have gone right to to "Pav's reasons are bad therefore scum" without ever passing through "Pav's reasons are bad, therefore dumb town".In post 957, DragonEater70 wrote: But 900, 863 and 867 read as flailing / throwing mud everywhere in search of a viable wagon
Here's the thing -- your play has been chaotic enough that it's been hard to read for me from game start. You've made some odd votes, sheeped FL almost without fail, and now that I'm professing some serious misgivings about you, wham, I'm one of your top scumreads. I don't think you OMGUS me like that as town.
You're the one I want today, baby, but we'll always have d1
Also why are you trying to convince me I am scum?
As much as I like to think I have a feeling for who's scummy here, and thus who's more likely to flip scum, I have to remember that we're at 10 players, with 3 scum, so no matter your POV, we are statistically more likely to hit town. With that in mind, yes, it makes sense to yeet in the higher-content slotsIn post 1076, DragonEater70 wrote: Also I don't understand something - do you want to vote slots only based on how much info they give? Not based on how lilely to flip scum they are?
FL reminded me of a thing.In post 1078, DragonEater70 wrote: Also (and sorry for spamming), what made you reconsider and decide I could be town?
Meanwhile:
Purely off-topic here but this has so succinctly encapsulated why I hate posting this way, and now I feel dirty for this post.In post 1088, Flavor Leaf wrote: cases with quotes are for scum or catchups.