In post 124, Ausuka wrote:
Maybe I need to change my practices for blitz but I'm nearly in prod range and there's like nothing I would want to comment on in a normal game lol.
Mainly for blitz it's changing your pov to "4 days from deadline we're in trouble if wagons aren't up to 1/2 the lim number".
Wanna play Minecraft with your ms friends? Check out the minecraft thread, or the channel on discord
In post 154, Dannflor wrote:
i don't feel Python cares about actually sorting me
You're not gonna get very in depth reads from us cause the deadline doesn't allow for it, we're very much playing this game in a "see something, shoot something" kinda manner
that isn't the issue
the issue is the kind of interaction i got
im not looking for an in depth read im bothered because you got defensive and then slotted me as scum without really trying to interact with me further despite clearly being very active and trying to get interactions in with people
i kinda like naerys' defense regardless of whether it is factually true or not
Why is gob town
uh i think he's going against the grain (which is not unusual) but it's not in the usual inflammatory/performative way that i usually see from scum!gob
he seems to be trying to figure things out and work with people
In post 65, davesaz wrote:
It would take me more than 15 minutes to catch up.
VOTE: Save The Dragons
Is this rvs or serious
A mix of RVS+reaction to spam which I think is even more negative in a blitz game than it is in regular.
this is AI?
Being a negative thing doesn't necessarily mean it's an AI thing.
I do think that some scum spampost to hide among the chaff. I don't know for this game.
Wanna play Minecraft with your ms friends? Check out the minecraft thread, or the channel on discord
In post 150, Dannflor wrote:
I think if you want to actually talk about way too strong/defensive reactions early in the game, this one from Python is actually scummy
I don't generally care about defensiveness and don't really see python's reaction as scummy either.
If naerys had called it a "bad push" or something on page 2 I wouldn't care at all
The issue to me is that "discrediting" is a more complex idea where I don't really think the gamestate had developed enough for that to be a natural thought process.
In post 105, gob wrote:
or is that within her scum range?
I haven't seen her recently enough to know. In fact not sure if I've seen her before.
So a null read, yes?
more like town lean, though very preliminary
cool thanks for clarifying
for the record i was trying to see if light galanski is partners with davesaz. that was my whole play and now its done.
light im null on same with davesaz, which is good cause i felt lightz vote on dave could be early wolf distancing
In post 150, Dannflor wrote:
I think if you want to actually talk about way too strong/defensive reactions early in the game, this one from Python is actually scummy
I don't generally care about defensiveness and don't really see python's reaction as scummy either.
If naerys had called it a "bad push" or something on page 2 I wouldn't care at all
The issue to me is that "discrediting" is a more complex idea where I don't really think the gamestate had developed enough for that to be a natural thought process.
it's not defensiveness by itself. a pretty general scum tell that I've had a lot of success using is outsized emotional reactions when the prompt doesn't match up. it doesn't really matter if it's defensiveness or sadness or anger, or what have you. the fact is i don't think my push matches up with python's reaction, which i think is unnatural
re: naerys
I would agree with you normally but I think later posts clarify that is basically what naerys was saying
I think naerys just uses awkward wording sometimes
In post 150, Dannflor wrote:
I think if you want to actually talk about way too strong/defensive reactions early in the game, this one from Python is actually scummy
I don't generally care about defensiveness and don't really see python's reaction as scummy either.
If naerys had called it a "bad push" or something on page 2 I wouldn't care at all
The issue to me is that "discrediting" is a more complex idea where I don't really think the gamestate had developed enough for that to be a natural thought process.
it's not defensiveness by itself. a pretty general scum tell that I've had a lot of success using is outsized emotional reactions when the prompt doesn't match up. it doesn't really matter if it's defensiveness or sadness or anger, or what have you. the fact is i don't think my push matches up with python's reaction, which i think is unnatural
I think you're misreading of us comes down mostly to
In post 189, Dannflor wrote:
pretty general scum tell that I've had a lot of success using is outsized emotional reactions when the prompt doesn't match up. it doesn't really matter if it's defensiveness or sadness or anger, or what have you. the fact is i don't think my push matches up with python's reaction, which i think is unnatural
also another element to it is python also leaning into trying to look unbothered by my read on them? which i would think if town and having a naturally defensive reaction would not feel the need to do