In post 799, Black wrote: There is an unaccounted Vig kill. If gob is lying about being the Vig then the real Vig would counterclaim
Do you read his 748 as claim to be Vig? I have thought from D1 that this is just his eccentric "Gob's" play.
In post 799, Black wrote: There is an unaccounted Vig kill. If gob is lying about being the Vig then the real Vig would counterclaim
He has to be a Vig. If he's scum that killed Cakez then the real Vig would have killed Ari and they would come forward and reveal that gob is scumIn post 800, Snow2697 wrote:Do you read his 748 as claim to be Vig? I have thought from D1 that this is just his eccentric "Gob's" play.In post 799, Black wrote: There is an unaccounted Vig kill. If gob is lying about being the Vig then the real Vig would counterclaim
Why did you wait to claim vig? I guess you had to discuss it in the pt firstIn post 812, Snow2697 wrote: I tried to explain in my 787. 2 wagons, one against a townie, need to understand who is on the 2nd for D2 analysis. I have figured out that Cakez would be under fire at D2 anyway.
Don't understand Gob's motive. At first I even did not realise he was claiming Vig's role. Probably to find out who is Vig. But why a scummy me would have made a claim to challenge Gob-Vig if no-one is really pushing me?
I cannot kill at N2. Had I remained silent and been killed at N2, Gob's claim would have been unchallenged.In post 813, NotAScum wrote: Awfully quick of Black to vote gob without giving the guy a chance to explain. Also I doubt a real vig would outright claim vig when they can just kill the imposter during night
I think gob is more likely to be scum than SnowIn post 813, NotAScum wrote: Awfully quick of Black to vote gob without giving the guy a chance to explain. Also I doubt a real vig would outright claim vig when they can just kill the imposter during night
Why did you wait to claim vig? I guess you had to discuss it in the pt firstIn post 814, NotAScum wrote:
I think Snow is telling the truth hereIn post 815, Snow2697 wrote:I cannot kill at N2. Had I remained silent and been killed at N2, Gob's claim would have been unchallenged.In post 813, NotAScum wrote: Awfully quick of Black to vote gob without giving the guy a chance to explain. Also I doubt a real vig would outright claim vig when they can just kill the imposter during night
Probably wrong at my N2 kill. Had I been killed at N2, my status would have been disclosed and Gob would have been challenged. But yes, cannot kill at N2.In post 815, Snow2697 wrote: I cannot kill at N2. Had I remained silent and been killed at N2, Gob's claim would have been unchallenged.
isn't it the opposite, if you get killed during night, gobs claim would be immediately challenged. anyway, I too tend to believe such strong claim but wanna see gobs counter-counter-claimIn post 815, Snow2697 wrote: I cannot kill at N2. Had I remained silent and been killed at N2, Gob's claim would have been unchallenged.
In post 822, gob wrote: Okay i think the team is snow and black + someone else.
Anyway there is no reason to lim Snow here today. Lets get Black.