uh...In post 1997, Random Nurse wrote:In post 1995, Psyche wrote:well now i do have a scumread and a few posts talking about itIn post 1991, Random Nurse wrote: I DO think it's a Scumtell when a player has only Townreads and Nullreads, no Scumreads.
but also i have plenty of other games where i'm town and similarly focused on solving through townreads than vice versa. i think you were in a recent one of those!
When exactly was that?
I'm still semi tunelled on the belief that I think there's a traitor - I think a traitors existence could be there to make mine and Gypyx's interactions potentially seem more scummy due to us blatantly buddying?In post 1999, Random Nurse wrote: Maybe there's only 2 left...
3 left in a 15 with barely any Town power doesn't seem balanced...
In post 2000, Psyche wrote:uh...In post 1997, Random Nurse wrote:In post 1995, Psyche wrote:well now i do have a scumread and a few posts talking about itIn post 1991, Random Nurse wrote: I DO think it's a Scumtell when a player has only Townreads and Nullreads, no Scumreads.
but also i have plenty of other games where i'm town and similarly focused on solving through townreads than vice versa. i think you were in a recent one of those!
When exactly was that?
on this page?
quoting the qIn post 1994, Psyche wrote: kqj, if you thought there was a reasonable chance that PP's posting was just his playstyle, what have you done to rule out or discount this possibility?
So my points are stale that after 3 completed games, I should be playing up to the level you’re expecting? I’m so sick of being told that either I’m too new to be trusted to make the right moves or not new enough anymore that I shouldn’t be making all the mistakes I’m supposedly making. And then if I make wall post, I’m just making excuses or being emotional. Check any other game besides that first game we played together and tell me I don’t act like this and get defensive and upset no matter my alignment. I am just exceedingly frustrated every time I have to deal with this. It’s so hard to enjoy a game when I can’t just play how I’m learning to play and still developing these skills without being shit on for not having everything down yet. Up until Psyche, no one was really doing that to me this game even though I’m sure I was making mistakes and not playing optimally, at least I was given room to play and I appreciated that more than you could know. Now I have the audacity to scum read someone, he reps out and his rep in decides to jump on me instead of anyone else because it’s easier to point out my flaws than anyone else voting him.In post 2007, Psyche wrote: i think kay is doing the same thing as in that other game
the wallpost doesn't attempt to address my core problem with her iso. it's excuses that should frankly be stale at this point and tries to explain in terms of a gap in apparent skill what is actually a gap in apparent interest.
it doesn't take experience to be genuinely interested in whether your reads are correct or not. all it takes is being town and caring about winning as town.
imo kay's posts only barely veil that she doesn't really care if her reads are correct this game
Don't want to disclose content of the hood talk. But my position in the open thread reflected what was going on there. Trying to figure out the likely set up now with these developments.In post 1869, Random Nurse wrote: Snow what have these Wonder Twins been saying in the Hood?
You think I don’t care about my reads being right? That’s literally ridiculous. I’m sorry but at this point you’re just trying to upset me because that accusation doesn’t fly since as I said before, you aren’t even caught up on the game. You’re now just tunneling because you think my reaction is proving your point.In post 2007, Psyche wrote: i think kay is doing the same thing as in that other game
the wallpost doesn't attempt to address my core problem with her iso. it's excuses that should frankly be stale at this point and tries to explain in terms of a gap in apparent skill what is actually a gap in apparent interest.
it doesn't take experience to be genuinely interested in whether your reads are correct or not. all it takes is being town and caring about winning as town.
imo kay's posts only barely veil that she doesn't really care if her reads are correct this game
Well if you’re really against making people upset on a moral level, I’d suggest you reread my posts from a human level and understand that what you see as excuses is me desperately trying to be understood for exactly how I’m feeling. You continually berating me and telling me I’m purposely playing the way I am because I am uninvested or insinuating I’m scum because of it and then tossing aside anything I say to justify your stance (at least that’s how it feels) feels pretty damn terrible.In post 2015, Psyche wrote: I've provided detailed reasons I think you're nit invested in having correct reads. In that context, it is unduly dismissive to call my stance ridiculous. It's also frankly insulting to assert that I've only said these things to make someone upset. I'm actually really against making people upset on a moral level! I am just trying to develop my reads and play the game.
I can’t give you a full explanation because of ongoing games but yes, the answer is nothing. It has lot to do with my frustration with the player and wasn’t in a good headspace to look through tons of his content. I also didn’t really have the time when it came up, not even taking into account my feelings, and then he repped out and I didn’t feel like doing it at that point because I wanted to see if things felt different with you in the slot. If you think that’s AI, which I’m sure you do, then push me I guess but I highly doubt anything I say will change your mind about me at this point.In post 2016, Psyche wrote: kqj, if you thought there was a reasonable chance that PP's posting was just his playstyle, what have you done or used to rule out or discount this possibility? Is the answer "nothing"? I know it's inconvenient if it's nothing, but a clear answer would objectively help town sort whether what I'm saying has any merit.