Mini Normal 2335: Rainbows (Game Over)

[LoveKilling]

Excluding fluffposts, these sum up the essence of your activity. Even asking if N_M trolls alot is setting yourself up to have a read based on it.

You clarifying you asked me a question and that anyone can answer is fluff.

So really I wasn't wrong saying you seem to be forcing reads. I stand by it and quoted these to clarify I didn't make it up.
[/quote]

[LoveKilling]

I thought I had it

[awesomeming327]

sad attempt at omgus + i wasnt even scumreading you originally

no it isn't + you said you had a red check on me and the only way that can be interpreted is as a scum read. If you meant something else, I feel like you would have clarified it by now.

i have clarified it by now. in fact, i clarified it in the very third post i made.

the question you keep repeating about me not repeating my scumreads is nonsensical, and I do not intend to dignify it beyond simply stating that having scumread does not necessarily imply that I should or would vote. why I should vote a joke scumread is even more whimsical.

[Charles510]

VOTE: Charles

Do you have a reason?

Still waiting for a reason

[Black]

VOTE: Charles

Do you have a reason?

Still waiting for a reason

You asked that 12 hours ago and Hu hasn't even posted since then

[Charles510]

VOTE: Charles

Do you have a reason?

Still waiting for a reason

You asked that 12 hours ago and Hu hasn't even posted since then

[halfasleep]

VOTE: Charles

Do you have a reason?

Still waiting for a reason

You asked that 12 hours ago and Hu hasn't even posted since then

oh good point

[halfasleep]

hu tao looks potentially scummy enough that it's probably worth running her up just to get her to react seriously to something
VOTE: Hu Tao
this is a better wagon to be on than mine imo

[halfasleep]

madman starting to look better to me with his responses to lovekilling so idk about him anymore

[Robbnva]

i have clarified it by now. in fact, i clarified it in the very third post i made.

honestly I thought that post, was more of a snarky response to RM, than you actually clarifying anything.

the question you keep repeating about me not

repeating

voting my scumreads is nonsensical, and I do not intend to dignify it beyond simply stating that having scumread does not necessarily imply that I should or would vote.

What is nonsensical about asking why you aren't voting your scum reads? Even if you only have one, that is the point of this game.

Serious question, have you played mafia before?

If you were town, you would know your voice and your vote are your only two weapons, and you really haven't been using either of those. Voting half after others, doesn't hold the same weight because you could very easily be scum piling on, or on the flip side could be a distance/bus situation. Only time will tell.

why I should vote a joke scumread is even more whimsical.

even if you weren't serious about your scum read on me, your scumread of half was serious was it not? Which makes my question valid, why would you not put a vote down on your scumread?

Striking out my earlier question because I see that while you are newer to this site, you do have mafia experience, so you are well aware of aspect of the game where you vote your scum reads.

VOTE: awesomeming327

Feel good this will flip red.

[RationalMadman]

You switch from me because others weren't voting me. Strange of Black to raise the issue and you suddenly join and vote.

I am voting halfasleep that's a sure scumread now.

[Robbnva]

You switch from me because others weren't voting me. Strange of Black to raise the issue and you suddenly join and vote.

I am voting halfasleep that's a sure scumread now.

Who is this directed to?

[Hu Tao]

VOTE: Charles

Do you have a reason?

I don't like what you've posted so far

[Hu Tao]

awesomeming, black, jacksonvirgo probably town

rationalmadman, hu tao, robbnva maybe scum

This may be vote worthy. I'll decide on catchup

[Hu Tao]

wagon on me is goofy at best. throwing out vibereads is perfectly reasonable early engagement.

Your vibe reads are terrible. As someone who always dies vibe reads. I can't see how you'd think I'd be partnered with Robb based on vibes. And how you think rational is scum here

[Hu Tao]

wagon on me is goofy at best. throwing out vibereads is perfectly reasonable early engagement.

Your reads, even on a vibe basis, make zero sense to me. Seems fabricated. You have been a scumread of mine all DP. It is not your vote on me, it's the why and how behind everything you're posting.

For instance, based on this wagon, are your reads the same, yes or no? Why?

Cook her!

[Hu Tao]

VOTE: halfasleep

okayge

This vote would have looked better had you voted them before anyone else had, not it doesn't look as good

I agree

[Hu Tao]

If you ISO lovekilling he's throwing out reads which is Towny but they seem to just be reads as in:

Say reads for the sake of it always try to.

Idk if this is scummy at all since I know of many players that play this way but to rigidly stick to this every post is odd.

His insight seems to stick to outing reads for the sake of it, there's something slightly unnatural about it.

I have not always tried to say reads.

Okay click ISO on yourself and tell me where I'm wrong on it. Outing reads is obviously fine, I've done it. However outing reads without cross examining/interrogating is a way scum can try to seem Towny without really leading to more tells in others.

So yes I have just given reads more recently, but I want to get the flow of this game going. I think a wagon on t3 and N_M would make them both have to play or potentially die.

Problem is... If they're Town, we gain absolutely nothing from it. By nothing I mean even the votes on them reveal NOTHING, since Scum and Town would have equal motive to vote them there.

I did Iso myself and my early posts have almost nothing to do with reads. I was mainly asking questions about certain things. In recent posts yes I have just give out info for no rhyme or reason so I understand your confusion on me being towny. But with both the times I gave reads their was really no reason to cross examine anyone, it's still early on in the game so trying to go out guns blazing asking tons of questions to people is counterintuitive this early

I think having vibe reads like HS is better than what t3 and NM have done. I am usually a lurker in other mafia games and putting pressure on the lurkers helps me find out if they are scum or not. HS has given reads based on vibes. I would like her to go into the specifics of how she got the reads before I vote on anyone.

I like you

[RationalMadman]

You switch from me because others weren't voting me. Strange of Black to raise the issue and you suddenly join and vote.

I am voting halfasleep that's a sure scumread now.

Who is this directed to?

The only person it could apply to.

[Hu Tao]

We have a black and a blackstar so we are fine

Haha didn’t notice that. Thanks

Trying to decide if this is a townslip or a lie. Surely scum would be keeping tabs on the different players

For some reason I don't like this post. As scum I've forgotten players tbh

[Hu Tao]

We have a black and a blackstar so we are fine

Hi, are you an alt? Or just new to the site?

New to this site, I’ve done video and text before.

Well welcome

How many games have you played and what is your favorite role?

Been doing video on and off sense December of 2022 but text from 2020-2021 but slowed a lot on text. I text to lean towards liking town but, I have fun messing with people as mafia. So I’d say town leaning but like both alignments

Surely someone named LoveKilling likes being town

[Hu Tao]

VOTE: Charles

Do you have a reason?

Still waiting for a reason

You asked that 12 hours ago and Hu hasn't even posted since then

oh good point

hu tao looks potentially scummy enough that it's probably worth running her up just to get her to react seriously to something
VOTE: Hu Tao
this is a better wagon to be on than mine imo

This line of logic makes literally 0 sense. If you agreed with the premise you would wait for me to reply before voting me

[Hu Tao]

VOTE: Halfasleep

Yeah I'm pretty confident this flips scum too.

[Hu Tao]

VOTE: Halfasleep

Yeah I'm pretty confident this flips scum too.

Finally got my tunnel for day 1

[LoveKilling]

If you ISO lovekilling he's throwing out reads which is Towny but they seem to just be reads as in:

Say reads for the sake of it always try to.

Idk if this is scummy at all since I know of many players that play this way but to rigidly stick to this every post is odd.

His insight seems to stick to outing reads for the sake of it, there's something slightly unnatural about it.

I have not always tried to say reads.

Okay click ISO on yourself and tell me where I'm wrong on it. Outing reads is obviously fine, I've done it. However outing reads without cross examining/interrogating is a way scum can try to seem Towny without really leading to more tells in others.

So yes I have just given reads more recently, but I want to get the flow of this game going. I think a wagon on t3 and N_M would make them both have to play or potentially die.

Problem is... If they're Town, we gain absolutely nothing from it. By nothing I mean even the votes on them reveal NOTHING, since Scum and Town would have equal motive to vote them there.

I did Iso myself and my early posts have almost nothing to do with reads. I was mainly asking questions about certain things. In recent posts yes I have just give out info for no rhyme or reason so I understand your confusion on me being towny. But with both the times I gave reads their was really no reason to cross examine anyone, it's still early on in the game so trying to go out guns blazing asking tons of questions to people is counterintuitive this early

I think having vibe reads like HS is better than what t3 and NM have done. I am usually a lurker in other mafia games and putting pressure on the lurkers helps me find out if they are scum or not. HS has given reads based on vibes. I would like her to go into the specifics of how she got the reads before I vote on anyone.

I like you

Who is this directed at?