Looks to me like you liked where your vote was and though you acknowledged it was still just debates over semantics, never unvoted. You must've been pretty sure he was scum to not take off a random vote...Clu wrote:@ PhilyEc
I initially voted for AndyTony as a random vote, yeah, but I then kept my vote on him for a couple of reasons.
Concerningly similar to what Uncle Pain said.Clu wrote: Empking: I'm not sure, but given that from what I gathered he always plays like this, he doesn't come across as scummy.
Was this even necessary? You've basically said, I'm not sure about PhilyEc's role, hes either town or scum. Going somewhere with this or are you just trying to add something to your scumhunt contributions?Clu wrote:PhillyEc: I have my misgivings, as you're very much dictating the pace of things right now. I'm not certain if you're a strong townie trying to get results or scum trying to lead us along.
Agreed.Clu wrote:fuzzy: Been lurking quite a bit, which I don't like, followed by the whole 'Why do you want a mass claim?' when it wasn't what EMpking actually said. Looking scummiest right now.
Well, if I put all four of you in a list ordered by scumminess, I’d get a second suspect. But it would be useless because I hardly have anything to back it up. IMHO we should play this Day considerately, trying to make up for the lack of useful discussion on Day 1. I think this will bring up some aspects.PhilyEc wrote:Okay, so you have one suspect? I was hoping for at least two..
Very true but after all, that’s the basic aim of scum, isn’t it. I do agree though that AndyTony made himself a very easy scapegoat back then… and I fell for it.PhilyEc wrote:I'm stating that this lynch was scum driven in my eyes. The fact that he was a cop was just a major benefit but a case like that would have never stood unless scum settled the doubts of the town players through some sort of success on logic (easy to do with Andy's huge pile of mistakes and backtracking).
Not really concerning but more of a consensus, forum-wide I’d presume. This shouldn’t strike out any real scumminess about him, though.PhilyEc wrote:Concerningly similar to what Uncle Pain said.Clu wrote: Empking: I'm not sure, but given that from what I gathered he always plays like this, he doesn't come across as scummy.
I guess it’s possible for anyone to “lead” the discussion. Leadership alone is rather a null tell in my eyes.Clu, regarding PhilyEc, wrote:I have my misgivings, as you're very much dictating the pace of things right now. I'm not certain if you're a strong townie trying to get results or scum trying to lead us along.
I know this is what I do when I'm scum but I'd like to wait, QL's just fuck up the game for the next day, especially when its a mislynch and to be fair thats quite likely seeing as how he could genuinely be having computer issues.Fuzzy @ 14th May wrote:I will re-read this game tonight and hopefully make a good post tomorrow, or whenever I get my computer back.
I gave my reasons right after this section of the post, so why are you speculating about them?PhilyEc wrote:Looks to me like you liked where your vote was and though you acknowledged it was still just debates over semantics, never unvoted. You must've been pretty sure he was scum to not take off a random vote...Clu wrote:@ PhilyEc
I initially voted for AndyTony as a random vote, yeah, but I then kept my vote on him for a couple of reasons.
PhillyEc wrote:Concerningly similar to what Uncle Pain said.Clu wrote: Empking: I'm not sure, but given that from what I gathered he always plays like this, he doesn't come across as scummy.
I don't see how those two statements are 'concerningly similar' and even then, I don't exactly see how agreeing with somebody is a reason for alarm.Uncle Pain wrote: I view Empking rather neutrally, I don’t like his style but he had a decent reason for his Day 1 vote.
Letting everyone know that just because you talk a lot doesn't make you a dead cert for townie.PhillyEc wrote:Was this even necessary? You've basically said, I'm not sure about PhilyEc's role, hes either town or scum. Going somewhere with this or are you just trying to add something to your scumhunt contributions?Clu wrote:PhillyEc: I have my misgivings, as you're very much dictating the pace of things right now. I'm not certain if you're a strong townie trying to get results or scum trying to lead us along.
If we mislynch, there won'tPhillyEc wrote: I know this is what I do when I'm scum but I'd like to wait, QL's just fuck up the game for the next day, especially when its a mislynch and to be fair thats quite likely seeing as how he could genuinely be having computer issues.
Hmm? I'm not entirely sure you're being honest of course. I dont assume anyones being honest at the moment, Day One really didnt help seperate scum from town and vice versa. I'm merely trying to be careful here, I think theres good reason towards being careful >_>Clu wrote:I gave my reasons right after this section of the post, so why are you speculating about them?
Yes, realised this later today while re-reading ._. Even more reason why Empking's proposal to quicklynch is a bad idea. I'm willing to go a week into this till Im sure who one/two of the scum is/are.Clu wrote:If we mislynch, there won'tPhillyEc wrote: I know this is what I do when I'm scum but I'd like to wait, QL's just fuck up the game for the next day, especially when its a mislynch and to be fair thats quite likely seeing as how he could genuinely be having computer issues.bea next day. That's careless Empking, if youaretown.
FL is scum, are we agreed on that?PhilyEc wrote:Hmm? I'm not entirely sure you're being honest of course. I dont assume anyones being honest at the moment, Day One really didnt help seperate scum from town and vice versa. I'm merely trying to be careful here, I think theres good reason towards being careful >_>Clu wrote:I gave my reasons right after this section of the post, so why are you speculating about them?
Yes, realised this later today while re-reading ._. Even more reason why Empking's proposal to quicklynch is a bad idea. I'm willing to go a week into this till Im sure who one/two of the scum is/are.Clu wrote:If we mislynch, there won'tPhillyEc wrote: I know this is what I do when I'm scum but I'd like to wait, QL's just fuck up the game for the next day, especially when its a mislynch and to be fair thats quite likely seeing as how he could genuinely be having computer issues.bea next day. That's careless Empking, if youaretown.
Thats a good point. This adds to why Fuzzy is most likely scum also =/Clu wrote:This might be a little WIFOM'y - but if fuzzyisn'tscum, it's been a day since a vote has been put on him. I would have thought that the two scum would have just quicklynched him else, after all, that would mean they win. I mean, there could be reasons not to to in other set ups, but when everyone knows exactly what's out there, I don't see why they wouldn't just, y'know, go for it right away.
Just a thought, at this poitn, there's no reason for the scum to be clever about avoiding a quicklynch.
Player behaviour over the reaction to the prospect of your lynch being so cautious is a good tell that theres scum being targetted for a lynch since scum themselves push for mislynches, hastening the voting process. I've only seen Empking pushing for a lynch to be honest. He seems positive you're scum (not sure why as even though Im in the 90% sure area I don't want to vote yet). Do claim though, town is considering your lynch.fuzzylightning wrote:Ok, I don't understand Empking telling me if I am town to claim or die, considering I didn't even have a vote at that point. But also asking for a quicklynch after putting a vote on me, that seems anti-town for him to do.
If the town would like me to claim, could two people, not Empking ask me to claim?
As far as who I think is scum, this game has become like many newbie's, with all the lurking, myself included, although it is because I don't have my computer back yet. I still have to use the firehouse computer and I am not normally on for that long.
I digress, currently, my top 2 are UP and Empking. Empking mainly for tunneling, now I realize that he is tunneling on me,, so this may seem OMGUS, but he hasn't looked at anyone else today as far as I can tell. UP because of the way he focused on AT yesterday.
Is the only case on me right now really for the fact that I have not been active in this game and haven't been quicklynched?