![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
BM
Sotty7 823 wrote:Mae, top three scum list please. Same question t
About page 8.Vi wrote:@ Haylen: When - if ever - did this game become serious?
1. Instinct. It wobbles all over the place.BM wrote: What about Jason would make you think he is scum?
What about Jason would make you think he is town?
You dont need to look anything up. If you know your opinion on him has wavered, you must also know off the top of your head, WHY it has wavered.
Also, would you lynch Hito on gut instinct, despite having no real evidence of scumminess?
Vi Post 829 wrote:Sotty7 823 wrote:Mae, top three scum list please. Same question tYO DAWG, I'M HAPPY FOR YOU, I'LL YET YOU FINISH, BUT VP BALTAR IS THE BEST SCUM OF ALL TIME -OF ALL TIME!
Actually, I listed them in my question to Battle Mage - roughly in order. To that end I'm disappointed that Battle Mage has been ignoring me. Should we compare inferiority compleces?
It's not that. My basis of thinking you are scum is pretty much based on gut, yes. My gut activates on people with bad grammar. There is a definite correlation here, but whether that correlation implies causality is another story. At the moment, I'm leaning toward an r of about 0.7.jason wrote:4) Nikanor is your entire basis of thinking I am scum based upon my grammar not being great? Or is there more? Why does your gut activate on people with bad grammar to make you think they are scum for this?
Fair enough. Now when did your posting become serious?Haylen 832 wrote:About page 8.Vi wrote:@ Haylen: When - if ever - did this game become serious?
Unlike the four or five people I had to ask who was scum because they had basically stopped scumhunting, I didn't even have a clue where to begin with Haylen because she never started. She's basically active lurking. (Or in other words, what you said.)Sotty 833 wrote:What do you think of Haylen?
That'll be me tomorrowy-bunny 835 wrote:mod: swamped in midterm grading, so V/LA through the weekend
And why did your instinct activate? Just in case you missed the above.1. Instinct. It wobbles all over the place.
2. See above question.
Why is it that everything I read that has to do with Haylen comes across in a Freudian context?DTMaster 840 wrote:You even say that[Haylen]is sick in this post and then give her the BOD next page.
DTMaster 840 wrote:I would call Jason scummy mainly because: he didn't unvote last day on Neto when I attacked him on this. I pointed out that all PR claims should be tested on day 2 onwards, he acknowledges this but doesn't move his vote. Maintaining on the doc wagon puts him as scummy to me.
jason #56 wrote:You make a good point, but I believe it could also be a scum ploy to out the real doctor.DTMaster wrote:@Jason
UnCCed doctor. These reasons should be represented on Day 2, not today to lynch the unCCed doctor.
I don't understand this response in 642. Could you help me out here?DTMaster 642 wrote:@Jason
1 doc trade for 1 scum on day 1 or 2 seems excessive. :<
The reason I am willing to give Haylen the benefit of the doubt is because I myself have been plagued by health problems that have affected my Mafia games as of late. One recently ended game that I will reference as it is now over...DTMaster wrote:
@Jason
797:
1. Haylen and I had the lurking debate before the recent comments. I dislike your statement of her since to me this reads as: opportunistic. You even say that she is sick in this post and then give her the BOD next page.
Really? I thought I fully explained things... guess you missed it but I will be glad to re-show you everything I posted regarding my Hito vote, and the lead up to it.DTMaster wrote:
2. Can you elaborate more on Hito's vote? You are treading on OMGUS territory here and I would like you to explain your full thoughts on Hit.
jasonT1981 wrote:
9)again a point and question directed at hitogoroshi, re post 773 where he voted for me.
Do you not feel me going after BM is scum hunting? Yes, while I admit I am trying to preserve myself in the game (anyone who has been declaired lynch of today would be in this situation) why do you feel the need to answer for BM, seems like coaching to me no?hitogoroshi wrote:Sorry for not posting. Because I had posted one page back I thought I was safe, I hadn't realized that that was all the way back on Wednesday. xD
Jason, his "case" is that you're more concerned with self-preservation than scumhunting and even when he's not starting a bandwagon you're simply yelling at the person attacking you rather than doing anything else. And that's been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt.jasonT1981 wrote:So BM I am asking... infact no I am now DEMANDING you make a case against me and show how I am indeed 'confirmed scum and will be lynched today'
I demand your case NOW.. no more pussy footing, no more side stepping as you have done, I have asked many times, as have others. I DEMAND your case on me if I am confirmed scum.
vote: JasonT1981
And do you really believe that me defending myself (as you say, self preservation) is reason to vote me? Your vote seems very opertunistic to me
HOS: Hito
jasonT1981 wrote:@ DTMaster re: post 778 request for List of suspected scum
BM – Obivious reasons outlined many times
Hito – his vote on me is very opportunistic, as well as him answering for BM, when I asked for BM's case. seems weird to me
jasonT1981 wrote:
@ hitogoroshi re post 789. what is the difference between lurking and not posting? You where following the thread but didnt feel there was enough to contribute? There is plenty that has been discussed, you are going up further in my scum list right now.
You also say scum like to justify there votes with reasons? Hmmm, I think voting without reasoning is more scummier. But thats just me. But then again, you then try to justify your vote as putting me at L-4 aas not putting me in lynch range, so you then are making yourself guilty of being scum are you not? At least according to your own theories?
Vi is right in post 790... complete drivel Hitos 791 seems he is trying to justify his voting again, something he says is what scum does in his last post? No?
jasonT1981 wrote:
Right now Hito has leapt up my scum-list and is sticking out like a sore thumb to me. BM, I am still thinking could be very likely scum, but it is his general cockiness of people should do as I say, and declaring people as today's lynch has me thinking that. Hito has been darn right scummy as of late.
unvote: BM
Vote: Hito
This post kind of bugs me. Just because something works once doesn't mean that it's been vindicated as a concept. This seems to suggest that'd you be comfortable posting once a day to vote, and that's it, because you have no real reasons to present and thus no rebuttals to your non-existent case to defend. More worryingly, this seems to be exactly what you're trying to get away with!Haylen wrote: 3. I made the final vote in 3 player lylo based completely on instinct, having tunnelled another player all game and previously seen this player a very town. I lynched her, she was scum. I was very pleased. So yes, I would vote somebody entirely based on instinct.
Did you not notice my post directly under that post, 798? Do you have nothing different to say regarding your vote on me after reading that post?Apart from the vote being opportunistic, the fact he says only scum give reasons to justify their votes and then goes on to give reasons to justify his vote in his next post in a rambling as illustrated above. He is living right up to his own self described scum-tell.
He asked for reasons FOR my vote.... 798 came AFTER my vote.hitogoroshi wrote:
Did you not notice my post directly under that post, 798? Do you have nothing different to say regarding your vote on me after reading that post?
Okay, I can agree with this actually. I can sympathize with the re-read fail. I still haven't found the time to re-meta Jason as of yet.DTMaster Post 840 wrote:I would call Jason scummy mainly because: he didn't unvote last day on Neto when I attacked him on this. I pointed out that all PR claims should be tested on day 2 onwards, he acknowledges this but doesn't move his vote. Maintaining on the doc wagon puts him as scummy to me.
*shrugs* Why can't I use it as a concept? I always follow my instinct...you should learn that everybody plays on the site differently, we all have different playstyles ect. As long as it is consistant, I don't see primarily using ones instinct as a scumtell.Hito wrote: This post kind of bugs me. Just because something works once doesn't mean that it's been vindicated as a concept. This seems to suggest that'd you be comfortable posting once a day to vote, and that's it, because you have no real reasons to present and thus no rebuttals to your non-existent case to defend.
Maybe me studying psychology has something to do with it .__. Or, maybe you're just thinking about me in a dirty way :pVi wrote: Why is it that everything I read that has to do with Haylen comes across in a Freudian context? Sad
I'm not sure...his colours are differentMae wrote: Haylen, not for lurking, but for parroting. Your gut activated by something, right? What was it?