Mini 1009 ÔÇô Popularity mafia (Game over - Mafia wins)

[scotmany12]

The Ironman slot has been filled by me. I plan to be more reserved in this game because when I'm overly aggressive I'm just setting myself for headaches. But I dislike the fact that you are suspicious of Mothrax. I've seen Mothrax. He has his own style and it had gotten heat on him, kind of like the heat that a player like drmyshotty (whom you have replaced) gets. I suggest that their playstyles are in view right now, not their alignment. Alignment has a chance to be more in view later.

First, you replacing Iron Man does not excuse what Iron Man did, and those who found him suspicious before are going to still find him suspicious.

And the second part of this is bullshit. People are attacking both of those players because they have committed scummy actions. No one is attacking their playstyles. They are attacking their scummy actions.

Vote count

(12 players alive = 7 to lynch before deadline)

(2) mothrax - scotmany12, ChannelDelibird
(2) Thief - eljcko, Blackberry
(2) nopointinactingup – mothrax, Korashk
(2) ChannelDelibird – Cuethlachtli, Simenon
(1) Tazaro – nopointinactingup
(1) Simenon – tumescence
(1) Korts – Thief

Not voting: Tazaro

:arrow: Day 1 – (Deadline is August 10)

[mothrax]

Ok here is my case

Page one

First reason is because Mothrax instantly buddies and wagons with the no RVS thing, says that he doesn't like it because all it does is start a conversation.

wait... what?

Honestly, I am not a big fan either

though

sometimes(most) it

is

the only way to start discussion.

did you actually read this post? Seriously? I didn't say I didn't like it because it starts discussion, I actually didn't give a reason for disliking it (neither here nor there.) I then admit that it is necessary in most cases because of the fact that it jumpstarts discussion. That doesn't sound at all like what you claimed I said...

Next he says that a RVS is necessary, which is very contradictory but also says he doesn't want to cast the first vote, but two vote were already cast moth...

again... reread those posts dear... I was asked why I didn't cast a vote and I said I didn't want to cast the first, it was referencing a past post (my first in which there was no vote)
[quote="drimawannabegangsta"

Page two

Here Moth you ask for a VC and say that the VC will prove your

innocence..

ummmmm no. [/quote]

My

defense

of the claim that I reacted poorly will depend on the vote count honestly...

defense=/=innocence

Then he says that from all of his great experience he has learned that wagoners are always scum, first off he joined less than a month ago, and once again I would like to point out that wagons are mostly Pro-Town in the early stages of games.
Then he admits to reading the game wrong

Ummm.... I never said that I had any great experience, I also never said that a bandwagoner is auto-scum, I said they seem scummy... also, most of my experience is offsite anyways... and we joined within two days of eachother... what gives you the right to call me out on time played?

Really guys don't get personal with things, I'm sorry Moth that he did that I know it was my character who did, but please don't hold that against me.

I don't hold what happened against anyone... it was a string of bad reactions... even if I were to play with ecto again, I would be civil. Just because I don't like someones playstyle doesn't mean I don't like them.


In Summary: I found that spot scummy when Ecto was there because it seemed as if he was fabricating arguments where there were none.
drmyblahblahblah did the same... I don't think he actually read my posts, just picked out a few key phrases and put words in my mouth...
the new guy... not enough to make an accurate read, but it seems like he uses big words to use big words

[Blackberry]

I'm really drunk right now, I'm going to try tapping into my intuitive powers and see if I can spot mafia via a brief skim through of everything.

[nopointinactingup]

@Mothrax: I'm sorry but Drmy is gone and can't answer you, you have to face me and remember my name now. And I don't use big words, just the usual terminology we see everyday on Mafia scum. Now are you gonna do something productive or are you gonna keep wining?

[Blackberry]

Cuethlachtli - MAFIA (check)
mothrax - TOWN
Tazaro (Iron Man) - MAFIA (check)
tumescence - TOWN
eljcko - TOWN
Thief - TOWN
Korashk (Korts) - TOWN
nopointinactingup (drmyshottyizsik ) (Ectomancer) - TOWN
ChannelDelibird - MAFIA
Simenon - MAFIA - TOWN
scotmany12 - TOWN

----

I have no idea what this means. This is my intuitive read upon seeing people. I can reexamine this when I am sober and see if I make any sense or am just dumb when sober.

[nopointinactingup]

BlackBerry is likely town. I don't think a scum is creative enough to fake drunk

[mothrax]

My analysis is based on that slot and the way both of your predecesors played in it. I find both of their play to be scummy. Yours I have no read on yet. Also, it is spelled whining

[nopointinactingup]

@Mothrax: What do you think about BB's post just then. Is it likely for real or a fake?

[mothrax]

Well, there are multiple factors... what kinda drunk is bb, where is bb located, etc... I think it has an opportunity to be real because what gain would he have gotten if he were truly faking it?

[Tazaro]

I willing to believe the intellectual honesty of the drunken mind displayed there.

[Simenon]

Did it ever occur to anybody that he could be both scum and drunk?

[Simenon]

lurker wagon = lifelong contentment

[Tazaro]

I wonder if there's a theory that says that booze speak is null...

[Tazaro]

Though, some alcohol can be truth serum. Confessin' to hating your mother-in-law, etc.

[Korashk]

Did it ever occur to anybody that he could be both scum and drunk?

^This

[Tazaro]

Well, I'm waiting for his sober re-examination. Sobermination.

[Tazaro]

if we don't get a revised post, then he's a lucid drunk.

[Blackberry]

I don't know what to make of my drunk accusations. I

think

I might just ignore them (although, I might keep a close eye on the people that popped up as mafia for me), but at the end of the game if they are right or wrong, I'll know in the future to get drunk to assist my mafia-detecting abilities. LOL

[Cuetlachtli]

Johoono, can we please get another round of prods for the inactives / lurkers? The deadline is next Tuesday.

[Cuetlachtli]

Cuet

: His #72 is terrible. I'd expect a town to play on either side of OGMUS-ing or responding lazily. Instead, he retorted with an emotional outburst. His arguments are okay, but the unnecessary amount of derision and makes me think there's also scum harboring hatred towards his attackers in his reply. His #175 is basically calling everyone scum, which I do not think a scum would really do. However, it could be a gambit and Cuet stays 2nd on my suspect list.
Cuet is unlikely connected to Ecto.

Hey Nopoint, thx for replacing in.


You characterized #72 as an emotional outburst with an unnecessary amount of derision. Can you please highlight moments of derision and emotional outbursts in said post for us?

In response to your description of #175, notably where you say "

basically calling everyone scum." Actually, I only called 5 out of the 12 players scum, explicitly. Half, as you know, is significantly less than all.

One last question. What is your opinion on active players putting pressure on inactive players?

[Cuetlachtli]

Cuethlachtli - MAFIA (check)
mothrax - TOWN
Tazaro (Iron Man) - MAFIA (check)
tumescence - TOWN
eljcko - TOWN
Thief - TOWN
Korashk (Korts) - TOWN
nopointinactingup (drmyshottyizsik ) (Ectomancer) - TOWN
ChannelDelibird - MAFIA
Simenon - MAFIA - TOWN
scotmany12 - TOWN

----

I have no idea what this means. This is my intuitive read upon seeing people. I can reexamine this when I am sober and see if I make any sense or am just dumb when sober.

You really need to elaborate on these reads. Especially since you think Thief is town, yet you have your vote camped on him.

[Blackberry]

Cuet -

did you even read what I said?

I have no idea what this means. This is my intuitive read upon seeing people.

^--- That

I remember reading posts and eventually I got to a point where when I skimmed through the page someone's screenname and image popped up to me as SCUM or was faded indicated townie. I have no idea what I am talking about. Regardless, I was drunk. I clearly stated that it was intuitive read, what part needs elaborating? I also said I don't think I'll pay much attention to my drunkness thoughts.

[Cuetlachtli]

Cuet -

did you even read what I said?

I have no idea what this means. This is my intuitive read upon seeing people.

^--- That

I remember reading posts and eventually I got to a point where when I skimmed through the page someone's screenname and image popped up to me as SCUM or was faded indicated townie. I have no idea what I am talking about. Regardless, I was drunk. I clearly stated that it was intuitive read, what part needs elaborating? I also said I don't think I'll pay much attention to my drunkness thoughts.

So you are still happy with a Thief lynch?

[Blackberry]

No. I think I've mentioned Thief has done stuff recently that makes me think he isn't mafia. Also, if you've read my posts, I haven't read-up on everything at one point, and still have yet to do so. The way you are reacting to my drunk post makes me think you're taking it too serious (maybe I hit you and one or both of your partners and now you're paranoid about it?).

For example, the statement + the eyeroll feels to me like you're getting defensive about my post.

Unvote

I will vote later when I read up on things more.

[Cuetlachtli]

The way you are reacting to my drunk post makes me think you're taking it too serious (maybe I hit you and one or both of your partners and now you're paranoid about it?).

For example, the statement + the eyeroll feels to me like you're getting defensive about my post.

So Page 10, Post 254 is yet another Cuet overreaction?