Hey guys, wanna know a SECRET?
AGar is town. His scumhunting and his frustration both look legitimate. Beefster+Confid's reactionary FoSes? not so much.
Chrono can die later, if Confid flips scum I'm pretty sure we've got a 2-for-1 scum sale right there in front of us.
KageLord wrote:Might be a bit WIFOMy (I hate this excuse for ignoring an argument), but I don't know why I'd set up a policy lynch (not even sure how I could be since I assume he will post something semi-useful to save himself before the end of the day, rendering my "policy lynch setup" moot) on Chrono for the end of the day when I could have just as easily jumped on the already forming wagon. I wouldn't look any more conspicuous than the person who gave "Baa." as a reason.
If he did, you could just jump off of it.
AGar wrote:Because I'm right?
You asked why I was ignoring your defense. I said it was OMGUS loaded. You claimed it wasn't. I pointed out the reasons it was.
You asked why I ignored your reason for voting. I pointed out that I hadn't, and re-iterated how I felt about it.
Why are you now choosing to ignore me?
We've been going back and forth for a while now, and I expect if I keep responding, we will keep doing so. Not going to clog up the thread.
Anyways, I want to do a mass iso later today and see what I come up with. I've got another game I'm doing this in, so I'm not sure when it will happen, but I will try to get it in today.
I swear I've seen CA's current behavior before. Despite the stupid behavior, he reads town to me.
AGar could also be town, but I think his accusations of CA could have hidden scum motives. CA could have a point about calling CA a newb to make him fit the bill for a newb-only scum tell. I just don't feel those kinds of reads are useful outside of newbie games. The fact that AGar is tunneling on one of the weakest players throws up red flags for me.
On hiatus indefinitely. This was a nice distraction when I was working through my faith transition out of Mormonism, but I need to move on to bigger and better things now. Get to know a meat boy
also, im pissed the chrono wagon died down, lets just reward lurking.
no one wants to comment on the fact that Chrono has posted 13 times since his "I dont have internet" post here......
ok, lets not call it lurking anymore, when can we call it lying?
Because we have a 2-for-1 in front of us.
I agree it's not exactly cool that Chrono is saying he's got V/LA and posting elsewhere, but I haven't been lurking the rest of the forum, so I've not seen it.
I don't think his lurking is telling though, it's pretty much found that lurking is null of alignment.
Ski mask? Check! Sawed off? Check! Guilty conscience, fear of death? Check! Check! Check!
Oh and CA - it's not a back-and-forth unless you keep trying to make it one. You failed to address two answers to questions you asked when the response came back wasn't one you wanted to see. It seems very scummy to me.
Ski mask? Check! Sawed off? Check! Guilty conscience, fear of death? Check! Check! Check!
The team lashes the large metal sheets and vines together to form makeshift shelters, just as the rain ends. They'd also be great for shade but there's already several thousand trees around for that. A collective groan is heard.
There's also the moment of hilarity when someone realizes they'd been using a large snake instead of a vine to tie a piece of metal to a tree. Just like in the cartoons!
Meanwhile, our enterprising baseball player up a tree manages to reach the broken cargo section of the plane. He shouts down a quick accusation before disappearing inside.
You'll have to forgive my tone this first post. It's far too upbeat and casual for you guys. But it'll be my only one like that. I promise. I need it to get into the game, you know? I really hope you read this blurb before attempting to read the rest of this post.
silverbullet999 wrote:VOTE: Agar
Cause you are scum and i missed ya
also hi beefster!
also with the votecount, how many votes do the players 13 and on have? I don't see a number associated with them!
Also how did the pilot get shot in front of all of us... without seeing who the shooter was?! I call inaccuracy!
Hey, it's you! You're still here! You sure you don't want that wiki?
Beefster wrote:I think I'll throw in some random questions... With 18 players, it might be difficult to get the Day 1 ball rolling.
1. Pepsi or Coke?
2. Favorite Setup?
3. How would you describe your meta?
4. Win/loss record?
5. Maximum number of games you'll play in at one time?
1. I dunno.
2. I dunno.
3. I dunno. Naive? Paranoid? Overconfident?
4. I forget. I don't think my sig has, though.
5. Not sure. I've got to find out my limit.
silverbullet999 wrote:i answered them in a previous game!!! : (
Why would that matter in this game?
Shattered Viewpoint wrote:I unvoted to see if you schlubs were paying attention.
Two of you are.
what is this i don't even
Shattered Viewpoint wrote:
silverbullet999 wrote:Fineee I'll answer... I was looking and couldn't find the game... though I could have sworn I played with beefster before... Maybe I'm losing my mind as beef didn't show any love to me in his posts.
This -- is totally, completely scummy. YOU ARE NOT ANSWERING THE QUESTIONS FOR BEEFSTER. You are answering them FOR THE BENEFIT OF ALL OF US.
Thus, you are trying to
keep information to yourself.
Scum.
My vote remains, and now with extra bonus Good Reason.
Explain the scum intent, Mr. Good Reason.
Shattered Viewpoint wrote:I think that you self-describing as "unpredictable" is quite accurate. Crafty, one might also say.
Who's your scumpal?
What was the point of this post?
silverbullet999 wrote:So crafty is scummy, and or unpredictability is scummy now ehh?
Whose my scum pal? Sorry but I don't have one!
VOTE: Unvote:Vote:Shattered Viewpoint
Tell us your scum pal good sir so we can win and lynch you two!
OMGUS!
This looks fabricated. The whole SB/SV thing looks fabricated. Or at least stupid.
Zajnet wrote:These are not the droids you are looking for.
xD
***
SV wagon is telling.
***
Shattered Viewpoint wrote:
silverbullet999 wrote:-Shattered
Is it later yet?
It is, for certain values of later. However, real content won't be here (from me) for a few more hours.
Zorblag wrote:I'll start with the important bit. L-2 does not mean it's time to claim.
I agree.
Zorblag wrote:@Shattered Viewpoint, how big a tell do you think paying attention is? Or do you think it's a tell at all?
I firmly believe that scum tend to (generally) skim through the thread, and therefore don't give the game the same level of attention that town players do. Therefore,
in certain circumstances,
I feel that lack of attention can be a scumtell.
I find that scum focus really hard on everything, sometimes harder than town. Maybe I'm just thinking about the good ones.
[quote="SV]I am not the lynch you're looking for today. Make of
that
what you will.[/quote]
I don't think you understand troll.
FoS
Beefster wrote:I'm seeing SV as a VI townie.
Hm.
Zajnet wrote:The irony is also killing me... SV's wagon falling apart because it is "too fast," and three votes pile on me in a couple hours. This is a bullshit wagon, by the way. I voted once outside of random, for someone that I, and others, feel is likely scum, and all the sudden "TOMGZ BANDWAGONING SCUMMZ!!!!1!!!!one!!1!1!12!1eleven!111
No more 11111!!!!elevens. They phail.
[quote="SV]I have failed. In looking back at a couple of games, I had SB confused with a different player (who shall remain nameless).
I have now successfully painted myself into a very bad corner, and I have no idea what to do about it.
More later.[/quote]
I've heard/said this before.
curiouskarmadog wrote:Explain to me, a.) what the over-reaction was…and b.)why over-reaction is scummy…
Why overreaction is scummy? Seriously?
Shattered Viewpoint wrote:
Enigma wrote:@SV
I said it before: I doubt scum skim, they are more careful than everyone else imo. Pretty pathetic reasoning there.
Why exactly do you think scum skim?
Because I've seen it. Scum drop in from time to time, read the shortest posts, contribute very little that's actually relevant, and once in a while they skate by and don't get lynched.
smashbro_of_the_SSS wrote:
Shattered Viewpoint wrote:I unvoted to see if you schlubs were paying attention.
Two of you are.
I don't see how it would make sure we're paying attention. Yes, it will let you see who noticed, but I don't see how that would help you find scum.
Scum skim. Skimming == NOT PAYING ATTENTION. Which is precisely what you're doing here, good Sir.
unvote
Vote: SmashBro
smashbro_of_the_SSS wrote:
Shattered Viewpoint wrote:I am not the lynch you're looking for today. Make of
that
what you will.
I need to re-read and find real scum now (likely not SB).
Oh, and AGar: I am not flailing. I did mention something that I am now unable (unwilling, actually) to back up; that's the extent of my crime.
This first line doesn't sit well to me. i get the star wars thing, but I'm wondering why he said "today".
It's a generic "today" -- not that I'll be the lynch for tomrrow, either. Rolefish much?
Ok, beefster has a point. But I want to call him out on it. I really do.
SV wrote:I have. I lynch them, too. If you aren't going to actively participate in a game, don't sign up for that game. Simple, really.
I'm just going to attribute this to off-site meta of some kind. Is this accurate?
Zorblag wrote:@Paltry Excuse, why do you think scum wouldn't want to bandwagon?
Why do you think scum wouldn't want to bus?
StrangerCoug wrote:"Gut read" and "weird unvote thingy", eh? Look like excuses to me.
Unvote: silverbullet999
Vote: Zajnet
Mmmmmmhm.
Gammagooey wrote:THIS JUST IN.
Paltry and Sotty are both sexy and have equally sexy points on Enigma.
Vote: Enigma
:S
Col.Cathart wrote:
PaltryExcuse wrote:@Col. Cathart, Zorblag & silverbullet999: What do you think of Enigma's play?
You know, for the purpose of this question I even ISO'd him.
strike one: Lot's of talking about theory, absolutely no talking about anyone at least potentially scummy, I didn't notice that before, awfully scummy.
strike two: hesitance to vote. One of my favorite personal tells, usually works like gold for some reason.
That's easily 2x as much as I had on both Beefster and SV.
unvote
vote: Enigma
Nice.
Chronopie wrote:
curiouskarmadog wrote:in other news, Chronopie is posting all over the site (10+ times today)...can we please start a wagon here and not reward him for lurking.
ofc I am. One game at a time, in order that I get the emails to my inbox.
Hmmmmmm...
Chronopie wrote:
And my Laptops nearly dead. I'll have to finish Page 7 and do page 8 later.
Thanks. I'll read it when I'm not in a tl;dr mood.
On that note, I'll continue later, and then make a serious post, with opinions.
Well, considering the deadline, I'm going with the wagon right now that I think makes the most sense. Mostly I just like AGar's case and dislike this person's "cases".
Because I hadn't read all the pages in the middle.
I opened MS, clicked, view your posts, spotted Open 233 near the top, opened the most recent page, saw that CKD had requested a prod, (as well as the Quote wall), and responded.
--
Now that I've read (the majority) of the pages in the middle.
Better than a no lynch. Might tell us something useful. Might support my innocence.
On hiatus indefinitely. This was a nice distraction when I was working through my faith transition out of Mormonism, but I need to move on to bigger and better things now. Get to know a meat boy