@Doubtful: My reasons for voting jim over DMSIS:
jim makes accusations like active lurking without really understanding the context - not putting effort into his accusations.
when called out for doing this^, he tries to appeal to the town by backing off on the attack and switching to a new target - the appeal is what bothers me more, because it means he's trying to look good in the eyes of the town, something a townie has no incentive to do.
I don't have the interest to put together a case on but I think they're likely scum together because of their interactions - their attacks on each other seem halfhearted, and they both back off fairly quickly. It looks more like a distancing maneuver than actual attacks on each other.
Doubtful wrote:
I don't quite see the relationship between jim and DMSIS - from their posting it seems as if DMSIS is just telling jim he has to scumhunt, repetitively.
The way you put it here makes it sound worse than it is, to be honest. He's attacking jim for not scumhunting, but he's also prodding jim to post content at the same time - trying to stop him from garnering suspicion by taking away the cause of the suspicion. And jim is responding to these prods - he's posted more content than ever now that he's been told to do it. There's a definite relationship between the two though it's not something you pick up on first read.
moose200x wrote:What is with the "baked" things you all are talking about, so waht, i smoke pot, get over it. I get drunk too, it's fun.
I really don't think anyone needs to know this.
moose200x wrote:DOCSHOTTYGUNGUY : Planning ahead is SUPER DUPER scum. You are 100% my number 1 target.
...
VOTE: BLACK MIST
Can you explain why you say the first line and then end up voting Black Mist in the same post besides the reusing an overused and usually wrong phrase?
moose200x wrote:Doubtful: I went back to the mist because imo WHY ME = FRY ME. When people say stuff like "why vote for me?" they are preparing their defense. only scum need to defend themselves.
1. Goddammit I hate that phrase so much - I'd never seen it here until now but it's always used on EpicMafia dear god
2. Haven't you ever seen a lynch pushed without ANY logic behind it? That's what the Black Mist lynch has been thus far - there is no logic behind the votes thus far, and nothing for Black Mist to defend against
3. You're saying here that a good townie shouldn't try to defend themselves and should let themselves be lynched. I'll let you figure out the obvious flaw in that strategy. Townies should defend themselves so that they don't get lynched and can instead push lynches on those who they believe to be scum.
Some questions:
Moose: Can you provide examples of your
reasons #2 and #3 against Black Mist?
Jim: Why the delay in your vote on moose? If you thought he was scummiest at the time of your PBPA, why did you not only not switch your vote, but leave it on DMSIS? You unvoted in a later post but still didn't change your vote.
chaodck: Can you at least give some form of content? Even a scumpick or two with brief reasoning would be better than not posting at all. The town needs everyone to participate and scumhunt otherwise the scum could end up leading the town around and jumping on easy targets to push mislynches - obviously not good for the town.
lol
