Nacho wrote: The South Park picture should have been your first hint.
A bit let down there's nothing for me directly.
But, that aside, DO you have anything for me?
Cop-out for what?Exe wrote:@AV: Your entire explanation of how you are just being "patient" reads as a cop-out to me.
You shouldn't need to think a vote through this deeply unless it's LyLo. If you're really thinking over a vote in this situation more than 5 minutes, you're overthinking.AV wrote:Clearly if I think Andy is scummy due to his alliance shenanigans that lets VV off the misrep hook; if I think VV's scummy that means Andy's proposed scumminess due to the alliance is a misrep. I was trying to decide what side to come down on, and that decision was eased by Andy's "Oh I was joking (but clearly Exe wasn't!)" post.
This doesn't make sense to me.Exe wrote:Your vote isn't on me.
Sounds like someone is trying so hard to pick the pro-town stance that he can't even remember what stance he picked.
Andrius wrote:Plum is high-suspect
I thought you weren't voting Plum at this point because you weren't happy that I called Plum CR and then didn't vote her?Andrius wrote:Nacho is leaning town
Parentheses are anti-town, haven't you heard?AV wrote:I know that. I was explaining why I hadn't unvoted. While deciding what to do (i.e. in the situation before I voted Andy) my vote is more useful on you than on no one. That's a statement in the (persisting/perpetual) present tense because the sentiment is still true despite the condition not being fulfilled. My vote is more useful on someone (in this specific case you) than on no one.
You're correct.Nacho wrote:I thought you weren't voting Plum at this point because you weren't happy that I called Plum CR and then didn't vote her?
If the net result was Plum is still scum and Nacho has a better chance of being town than scum, then why no Plum vote?
Call me Vas, ;D A little less active than I used to be due to IRL. Hoping to be back up to speed soon-ish!
You're next.chesskid3 wrote:my gut says Parama is CR
>_>
time for gutvoting
Unvote
Vote: Parama
Since when have I only posted one sentence about AV? I don't see how you can even begin to make the argument that the sentence u quoted was the only time I gave attention to AV being suspicious. And that "something" is that I have a gut scummy read on him. Isn't that obvious?Nacho wrote:What is that something? And why is this sentence all the attention that "something" gets?
Seriously? I think someone is just asking questions for the sake of questions. This is starting to smell like an act to appear pro-town.Nacho wrote:Cop-out for what?
cooldog wrote: @andy, let me get this straight: when you posted "ALLIANCE IS GO" in response to exe posting about you being in an alliance with him, you really meant, lets have a good game guys, and lets have a lot of fun. I read words, not crap run-around. You were for the alliance when exe posted about it, and now you defy that you ever wanted one. Also to your point about l-1, it isn't necessary, you have already started to play differently. You have flip-flopped and lied about your original intentions. confirm vote: andy
Yes. Hence the South Park picture.lets have a good game guys, and lets have a lot of fun.
I was not. Declaring an alliance before any strong reads AT ALL is asinine, and I have never supported an alliance. You must have a stick up your ass because you're clearly not seeing the light-hearted fun atmosphere I tried to create on PAGE FUCKING ONE.You were for the alliance when exe posted about it, and now you defy that you ever wanted one.