smargaret wrote:That's a decent point, KCD; given that C-Worl screwed up the wincon, it stands to reason that mafia did
not
get a copy of the VT role pm. At that point, Zinger's claim looks more town. I'll revise my list accordingly.
Ok, I know one post isn't nearly enough, but I'm not sure if anyone else noticed, but much of the time, smargaret seems to go along with what everyone else says, and just appears to expand on what's already been said, or restate what's already been said.
smargaret wrote:Trow: I had no idea which night mafia might choose to kill on, since the presence of town time machines implies scum have them as well. It was a 50-50 shot (I doubt maf would go to the future to kill), vs getting another result. I had no idea Tasky would modkill Grey.
I imagine scum chose to kill the confirmed innocent instead of me because they think they can convince you all to lynch me. Nobody was going to vote GW after my result.
I'd rather not discuss time-related powers. I don't want to make it easy for scum to find me.
Tragedy, do you suspect anyone other than me? Are you going to respond to my responses from yesterday?
Right now, Tragedy's my top suspect. Cworl just needs to die if he's not going to play the game. I'd be happy to see either of them lynched.
You seem to ignore things, when you feel like it, but then bring them back up when that information can be useful to you. (Example: Kcdaspot's one shot.)
Ok, smargaret, I'd like to shorten your name to sm, since it's easier to type, kcdaspot, do you mind kc?
The think with sm, is that her information is not necesarily accurate or true, but it's small things that can help her argument, and things that not many people notice or point out.
What makes me want to back track is the content that comes up once in a while. Sometimes, it's amazing and it's exactly what's on my mind.
Othertimes it's like she's just restating what other people say.
Did you read previous days? Did you miss un-cc'd cop claim? And why haven't you discussed C-Worl (or anyone else; surely I can't be your only read one way or another) at all?
Jilynne, this is not adequate content. Also, people tend to abbreviate my username as smar/g.
This is stupid. I said kill because that's what I'm used to win conditions being but I was told about someone trying to control of time my win condition was roughly.
I win if (actually it was iff with two "f"s in the pm) there is a living player and every living player is Town-aligned.
I travel to a nightin time, and block someone. I assume it means that if they try to conduct an action on that night then they get blocked. I'd have to ask the mod more to be sure.
Mod, are my interpretations correct? What does happen if I track X and X takes an action both in my time (N3) and travels back from N4 to act again in N3?
A tracker sees all outgoing actions: Say X from N3 targets Y in N2, tracker will see him; but tracker won't see X if hecomes from another time. tracker won't get to know to which night target went.
smargaret wrote:
Mod, will the answer to the questions in my previous post be any different if I ask them via PM?
I will not be around the whole weak. sorry about that.
You can take your last stances and send me in your lists, you know the procedure. As soon as I get back I will post the lynch scene.
As in Tragedy you were calling for a full claim from the ones on the block right (not a mass claim).
@Kcda: now that we have both c-worl claims(as well as smarg`s 'i didn`t timetravel'), if your n2->n1 block was yourself to save smarg, please claim so now (if not, don`t reveal who you did block)
As for the 2 roleblockers:
Kcda blocks timetravel as well(explicitly claimed), C-worl doesn`t (at least claimed to assume such): (at least), one of them is scum.
I think it`s quite clear which one.
As for smarg:
- claiming cop who doesn`t know what her powers do with respect to time travel
- called her results confirmed innocent, while 'being lynchable' herself
- 'forgot' how she was 'supposed to die' last night, any truely surprised player (town) would have looked into this and found the obvious reason
- all her 'results' are dead
- investigated the 'least motivated player' in order to get him the 'town leader position' instead of watching her 'confirmed townie who she suspected to die' (the 50% excuse isn`t enough to talk your way out of this one)
Lets just say: i see why no one counterclaimed.
(i think we got 2 scum on the block here)
I should have been more specific there...
At least we know someone's a "SUICIDE BOMBER"... Ah.
Smargaret. Full claim. ._. EVERY SINGLE PART OF THE CLAIM, REPEAT-IT-ZORS.
I blame you for this.
For I have been awaiting for another heart pounding segment of
Dokidoki Precure!
[10/15/2013 - 00:13] -
Tragedy
~
I wish for Kami-nii-sama to have better naming skills.
I have a bit of a theory but I'll wait until after this question is answered.
I'm voting for C-Worl by the way.
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
Mr. Trow - Can you give me the list that you sent in on N2? (after Amrun's and smargaret's statements)
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
Tragedy, why are you asking us to fullclaim again?
I'm the town Private Investigator. I have two cop investigations - innos on GW and Grey on n1 and 2. I have a single track and a single watch remaining. I cannot time travel. The answer to how my abilities interact with time travel is given in Tasky's post.
I think it's reasonably clear C-Worl is scum, because 1. I got a result last night. 2. Why would you block an un-cc'd cop? 3. He didn't even try to argue who else might be scum in his last words post and 4. He didn't do anything as far as scumhunting today or yesterday.
I'm not as clear on jilynne. She's either overstretched and new town, or she's overstretched and new scum. I'm not sure she would have claimed like that as scum; I'll have to reread but that kind of fake claim is not the kind of thing I'd have done at this point in the game with that role as scum at a month in on this site. I'm getting more suspicious of RC after rereading today simply because he's a strong enough player that he should be taking the lead or at least participating more, and I'm really not sure where he stands - he's not supposed to be in the background. I want to see him on the block tomorrow, and I'll be voting for him in the second living spot immediately after C-Worl.
@smarg:
1. Your word against his.
2. Was suspicious of you before, it clearly was the only way to 'prove' his suspicion (should he flip town roleblocker you`ll be on top of everyones list instantly)
3. Good thing you picked up on this, so you could do better ..... ow wait
4. Hey a point that does hold, well 1 out of 4 is a decent score....
As for your remark on the bomber-claim, i believe it.
Combined with the town requirement to have a player alive to win, it makes sense for such a role to exist.
A scum alligned bomber, would result in a scum-1-shot doublekill (i believe this was already stated as overpowered) unlikely (requires too many scumreads to be town)
