In post 248, Om of the Nom wrote:I'm more confident in Lucky scum.
K'
Any idea's on his possible scum buddies?
I can't seem to figure out any tbh.
In post 248, Om of the Nom wrote:I'm more confident in Lucky scum.
In post 237, Amrun wrote:In post 232, Luckyjt wrote:That bolded post, I said I had suspicions on glass and kondi then they voted for me not the way you said it. This argument may only work on Vijay but Ive explained my reasoning to death as to why I believe he was scum.Also very contradictory in two of your posts. First you say Vijay is leaning scum, then you say "Also, fail fakehammer, vijay, but you're still town." And someone explained that if Vijay is scum and tried the fakehammer he was trying to get us to believe Kondi was town.Finally the reason I said I wanted to hear from you is because you replaced Kondi my highest suspect as scum.
You only suspected people that suspected you, and for poor or non-existent reasoning ... and didn't vote them! Then later, you tried to deflect suspicion because "you hadn't even voted them."
I did not say vijay was leaning scum. Town members can make stupid moves -- and fakehammering in and of itself isn't fail, I just think that execution was poor.
And that doesn't make any fucking sense. Why would scum fakehammer to convince town that kondi is town? Scum don't want to convince town that townies are TOWN; they want to MISLYNCH town.
As for the last, yes, fair enough, and I realized that as I read along.
BBmolla, you can't just say someone was obvtown early day 1 and give no reasoning. Clearly, very few people, if any, agree with that assessment.
In post 250, iStark wrote:In post 248, Om of the Nom wrote:I'm more confident in Lucky scum.
K'
Any idea's on his possible scum buddies?
I can't seem to figure out any tbh.
V2V wrote:Well I'm suspicious of anybody who keeps pushing the Delta claim as being scum-oriented, but from memory it was IG who started it. His inability(not that harsh, but I can't think of any other word) to outline why Delta's split claim has any scum intent coupled together with the fact that he is adamant about DW-scum makes me read him as scum trying to push a mislynch on somebody who is the next best thing to conftown imo.
V2V wrote:Anyway I don't know what to add, except that I will vote for Lucky if we haven't lynched near deadline.
BBmolla wrote:Guys.
Guys seriously.
Can we lynch Vijay?
In post 260, Korlash wrote:Iceguy is closer to confirmed town then Delta is... To actually say this and not be joking is just further reason you should die today...Why would scum lie just to mislynch a freaking miller? WHY? Not a good trade for him.
Amrun wrote:WHAT IS THIS
THIS IS THE OPPOSITE OF SENSE
In post 262, Korlash wrote:Why would any scum say what Iceguy did in order to mislynch a MILLER on day one? Why?
Amrun wrote:That could be valid, but there are some of reason scum would do that. Assuming optimal play for all scum at all times is stupid. a) He was being viewed as confirmed town. b) IceGuy has been incredibly lazy, regardless of alignment. c) He may not have thought it through properly.
Either way, it doesn't make DeltaWave scum as you seem to suggest.
In post 264, Korlash wrote:Amrun wrote:That could be valid, but there are some of reason scum would do that. Assuming optimal play for all scum at all times is stupid. a) He was being viewed as confirmed town. b) IceGuy has been incredibly lazy, regardless of alignment. c) He may not have thought it through properly.
Either way, it doesn't make DeltaWave scum as you seem to suggest.
Where did I ever suggest he was scum? I said quite clearly it allowed for both of them to be town. The fact remains that I feel Iceguy is MORE town then Delta due entirely to timing, but that doesn't mean either have to be scum.
As far as your reasons go, none of them are particularly strong and hardly anything to base a scum read on, as V2V has. So back to my original point, V2V is scum. ^_^ Everything works out!
Moth Omen wrote:I'm still waiting on an explanation as to why Glass was scum.
Glass wrote:You are missing the actual scummy move made by rylai, otto. It isn't the fact that he miscounted, but the fact that he apparently didn't know what was going on and yet was willing to put kondi at L-1
Glass, in response to Rylai wrote:God. Another scummy person. So you don't want to lynch someone who you think is lying about being miller because...
...
Need to look over malth+rylai again.
Amrun wrote:I don't agree.
In post 256, vijay2vasandani wrote:In post 250, iStark wrote:In post 248, Om of the Nom wrote:I'm more confident in Lucky scum.
K'
Any idea's on his possible scum buddies?
I can't seem to figure out any tbh.
I think you should wait to see the flip first before speculating.
Anyway I don't know what to add, except that I will vote for Lucky if we haven't lynched near deadline.
In post 253, Luckyjt wrote:So why do you think im mafia.
(forgot to write this on my last post.)
And one more thing, Kondi and Amrun have one thing in common, both wanted to lynch me. Ive had that slot as my highest scum read and both say Im scum.
Downloading the files now.
In post 273, Rainbowdash wrote:unvote
I can confirm that im a miller varient role. Its not called "miller" though will not say real role because it reveals what if any additional abilities I have, and like DW said it specifically investigates as mafia goon which is probably important. Was an offshoot miller last time and it was based off a specific hidden mechanic. Think he is stupid for claiming miller, but DW is a bit of a derp to start. One of those who is just useful enough to stop everypony from policy lynching him.
Speaking of policy lynches hi kondi and CSL.
Other important points
1) We are not all targeting the same player with our roles. That would be derpy as it allows for maximum scum manipulation
2) Tomorrow you hypo cop and gunsmith.
3) AD is town, and I think Glass is town, vijay just reads town also.
4) CSL and malthus are good scum picks. Ice isnt bad. All the wagons going on suck.
Vote CSL
Explain your hop to DW wagon. Case... tomorrow maybe? Will have to work around a meeting to get something up of substance.