In post 2274, Maxous wrote:I don't see how OMGL's response is particulary scummy though.
Hmm ok. How do you think scum would respond differently?
In post 2274, Maxous wrote:I don't see how OMGL's response is particulary scummy though.
In post 2252, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:In post 2251, Fallman7 wrote:Ok seeing how this is going I am going to wait untill the next day to put anyone on the choping block. I don't want to assume and get myself in trouble from the get go.
Kill it. Kill it now PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE HELP ME KILL IT DEAD>
In post 2279, DeasVail wrote:And also, I see what you mean, but I don't think it's nearly as conclusively scummy as you think it is.
In post 2277, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:In post 2252, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:In post 2251, Fallman7 wrote:Ok seeing how this is going I am going to wait untill the next day to put anyone on the choping block. I don't want to assume and get myself in trouble from the get go.
Kill it. Kill it now PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE HELP ME KILL IT DEAD>
WHY IS NO ONE KILLING THIS SLOT WITH PURGING FIRE?
OH MY FUCKING GOD DIEDIEDIEDIEDIEDIEDIEDIEDIEDIE
In post 2279, DeasVail wrote:And also, I see what you mean, but I don't think it's nearly as conclusively scummy as you think it is.
In post 2281, HezLucky wrote:It's possibly DV is just maf trying to feign stupidity [durr I dont know why he's scummy durrrrrrr]
In post 2262, StrangerCoug wrote:In post 2259, Nero Cain wrote:Its the only logical fucking explanation. There's no fucking vig. Those shots were terrible. Can a vig be terrible? Sure. Like I said if there were three shots I would buy a terrible vig. But with two shots and most if not all large games being mutli-scum (mafi team, cult, SK) The chances of us having an everyday vig are -99.9%.
You can stop preaching to the choir. It's been clear since before I voted you that I don't see a vig as likely. The reason for my vote is because you said it was a multiball, which I define as two Mafia teams. Not a single Mafia team and a serial killer—two Mafia teams. I have asked you to supply me with a third-party statement that a single Mafia team and a serial killer can constitute a multiball and you have not done so. Until you do this, I consider you to beouted scum. The presence or absence of a vig was never relevant as we both disagree there is one—the current argument is a dispute over whether or not a single Mafia team and an SK is a multiball.
In post 2267, Maxous wrote:In post 2209, The Mini-Librarian wrote:@NC: I mean backed off in that I stopped trying to convince you I'm not scum. At this point this seems like a pretty useless endeavor wouldn't you agree? You came off the scum read list for late day 2 play. Don't you have a scumread on FG?Why demean my scumread on him then?
Can you point outhowNero is demeaning your scumread on FG?
Because I don't see it.
In post 2078, HezLucky wrote:In post 2265, StrangerCoug wrote: You may do my request for Nero Cain for him, but unless and until I get a statement from outside of the game made by neither Nero Cain nor me that says a multiball can consist of one Mafia team and a serial killer, my vote is not budging.
For the record this is wrong, what other people define as multi-ball is irrelevant.
It's only important what Nero beleives the term refers to.
In post 2273, DeasVail wrote:Oh yeah, and SC's accusation that only scum would assume it's multiball is not good.
In post 2283, Nero Cain wrote:In post 2262, StrangerCoug wrote:For the record though I think multiball is any game with more than one kill a night from different factions.
I also find it pretty funny that you wantmeto find a statement that states multiball doesn't have to be just two mafia teams butYOUcan't find a statement that defines multiball as 2 mafia teams andONLYtwo mafia teams. Shouldn't the burden of proof be on you?
Very well then, I will present what leads me to believe that a multiball is a two-scumteam game: Although doing a search for "multiball" on the wiki fails to come up with a page specifically defining the term, these three setups come up, which have in common either two Mafia teams or a Mafia team and a werewolf team; the designation "werewolf" simply being a retheming from Mafia.
In post 2284, Nero Cain wrote:Well it looks like we are both a little wrong and right. Empking says it refers to multiple kills from anti-town (group) factions so the way I interpreted that was it could still be a Cultafia or a group of SK's like Lock Lamora used in his WWE game. The co-mod says that Fonz (who came up with the term) defines it as two scumteams. So I guess you're right though I think its pretty ridiculous that it HAS to be a group kill. A kill is a kill. Doesn't matter if it comes from a group or not. Oh well.
In post 2282, DeasVail wrote:In post 2281, HezLucky wrote:It's possibly DV is just maf trying to feign stupidity [durr I dont know why he's scummy durrrrrrr]
Is that what you're doing?
In post 2285, StrangerCoug wrote:
Very well then, I will present what leads me to believe that a multiball is a two-scumteam game: Although doing a search for "multiball" on the wiki fails to come up with a page specifically defining the term, these three setups come up, which have in common either two Mafia teams or a Mafia team and a werewolf team; the designation "werewolf" simply being a retheming from Mafia.
In post 2275, DeasVail wrote:In post 2274, Maxous wrote:I don't see how OMGL's response is particulary scummy though.
Hmm ok. How do you think scum would respond differently?
In post 2292, Maxous wrote:Not saying it is a town looking response, he just said he is'nt responding because there is nothing from the line to respond to.