In post 423, DJ P0n-3 wrote:To see whether you'd get defensive.
How would you define defensive? In this context what would me having gotten defensive told you?
In post 423, DJ P0n-3 wrote:To see whether you'd get defensive.
In post 330, Charlie wrote:You'd have to read those replies I made to her in an aloof or highly sarcastic tone; then it'll shed a different light on things.
Rarity, Tierce obviously thinks I've lost it and clearly you've mentioned that my replies were "rude and asinine": I assure you it is not. Refer to that poking something with a stick analogy? Yeah, that's the best context I can offer to the floor. Nothing against a person personally, no personal attacks, just using applied psychology in the hopes to garner a more extreme reaction from the target, side effect is others take notice and inputs. I note the people who respond positively, those who remain indifferent and those who respond negatively. I gauge those reactions with a gradient of honesty. I then get a better idea of the personalities behind these walls of text. That's a part of how I play this whacky game of online Mafia (seriously? I have no idea how to play this game.) :applelie:
In post 331, Vi wrote:Charlie 330 wrote:People with inflated egos are malignant (generally true).
[x] Hey!Charlie 330 wrote:Hey. Hey, girl! Wake up
[ ] Listen!
[ ] Go!
[ ] Watch Out!
[x] Wake Up!
Charlie 330 wrote:I recognize[Vi's]wicked sense of humor as a symptom of too much exposure from the intertubez,
In post 334, Vi wrote:...In post 0, Rainbowdash wrote:Ponies Present (2)
01 Tierce
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13 Charlie
14
15
In post 336, Feysal wrote:In post 258, DJ P0n-3 wrote:Truly, you have a dizzying intellect.
Just because you don't agree with the tell being valid does not mean you get to be rude about it.
In post 336, Feysal wrote:In post 258, DJ P0n-3 wrote:Now please, at the risk of being called a hypocrite, explain to me why you have to write such long-winded responses?
I just do. Always have, always will. Deal with it.
If this is the sort of posting I can look forward to seeing from you, I don't think I'll enjoy playing with you very much. Unfortunately I think you're town, so there is little I can do about it.
In post 336, Feysal wrote:Now I suppose I need to ISO Charlie and see what the case on him is all about.
In post 341, ProsecutorGodot wrote:What I meant with the bait comment was that we could talk about what that altslip meant and the WIFOM behind it until the Mod declared "No Lynch" since I could have just as easily called Chamber out on his explanation, but we didn't get into that. It was moot. Though now, we've been into some good discussion about reads and have started pointing out different things about everyone and what connections and comments we should keep in the back of our minds for later day phases. That comment is now outdated as its relevance has expired and stronger information and reads have come to light since then.
In post 342, Vi wrote:The bolded above are what I feel are the relevant parts of this post.In post 341, ProsecutorGodot wrote:What I meant with the bait comment was that we could talk about what that altslip meant and the WIFOM behind it until the Mod declared "No Lynch" since I could have just as easily called Chamber out on his explanation, but we didn't get into that. It was moot. Though now, we've been into some good discussion about reads and have started pointing out different things about everyone and what connections and comments we should keep in the back of our minds for later day phases. That comment is now outdated as its relevance has expired and stronger information and reads have come to light since then.In post 336, Feysal wrote:
I would like to see Godot explain what he means with the bait in post #178, because I can't understand it no matter how many times I read it. For the record, I believe Pinkie Pie is town too, that was my immediate reaction to post #94.
In post 343, Salamence20 wrote:Does Vi always get fluffy in mafia?
In post 344, Vi wrote:I'm cute when fluffy ^-^
In post 345, Shmugen wrote:This is the fluffiest I've EVER seen Vi by a wide margin.
In post 346, chamber wrote:You guys have shitty definitions of fluff. (godot charlie smugen is still the scum team)
In post 347, Rainbowdash wrote:ProsecutorGodot has requested replacement. One coming in ten seconds flat (or so)
In post 349, Salamence20 wrote:In post 347, Rainbowdash wrote:ProsecutorGodot has requested replacement. One coming in ten seconds flat (or so)
YOU GOT TO BE F^#%^{}^ kidding me!!!
Needs more votes, do not let him slide under the radar.
In post 349, Salamence20 wrote:P-edit: does fluffiness effect vi's alignment in any way?
In post 354, chamber wrote:I'm inclined to believe that replacing him out makes him more likely scum if anything, but I had a strong enough scum read prior to the replacement to not hold that above his replacements head too, there are non scum reasons to replace out there after all.
In post 358, Tierce wrote:That was the weirdest thing. 10 minutes before a post that didn't show any interest in replacing out and then request replacement? My first instinct is scum, town usually fights tooth and nail--and at L-5, at that, so it's not like there was a ridiculous amount of pressure.
However, even though there are other games he's in, that was his last post as of now--I'd rather wait and see what happens to Godot's activity around the site--and honestly, this kind of read makes me feel dirty, but it seems inane not to use it. :/ I'm conflicted at a moral and read level.
In post 369, Salamence20 wrote:Actually, for once, I know what I am doing.
Don't lynch Arugula today.
Trust me, or if youre scum, dont.
In post 370, chamber wrote:Why would you day-cop Godot of all people?
In post 371, Salamence20 wrote:In post 370, chamber wrote:Why would you day-cop Godot of all people?
Rolefishing much?
I'm not a day cop.
In post 372, chamber wrote:Thats not rolefishing.
In post 373, Arugula wrote:Ok I've read. This game is weird. I didn't make a huge catchup post, but if anyone has any specific questions on where I stand, go ahead and ask.
In post 366, Salamence20 wrote:Arugula knows how to play mafia. And like his replacement, arugula will find a way to point this all at me.
What? You want my slot lynched the whole time, but when I replace in, I shouldn't be lynched? I'm not following your logic, as the reason you don't want me lynched isbecause you think I will paint you as scum.Could you elaborate?
Salamence and DJ Pon3 have been flip-flopping on my slot, and it gives me the shivers, like they are doing whatever helps them at the moment. Charlie has also given me bad vibes, but I need to ISO him to get a good reason why.
One thing that stuck out when I was reading is that Salamence called out Godot for using the newb/VI card, when Salamence does this in nearly every game he is in, meta-wise. I am keeping my vote on him right now.
And there was something in DJ Pon3's ISO that ruffled my feathers, but I can't remember what it was. I wrote it in a post in a new tab, but my internet went out at around Page 11, so I lost it.
@Chamber
Did you revote me because Godot replaced out?
In post 384, Salamence20 wrote:Wait, time out.
Why are people voting Arugula when I said don't, but when I said vote Godot they didn't.
Fuck logic.
In post 385, Salamence20 wrote:And now Godot has been posting in another game, so everything I said is now void.
VOTE: Arugula
I'm sorry your time here is short.
In post 402, Charlie wrote:Arugula, please claim.
Konowa wrote:
Regarding Arugula’s entrance, still do not feel like he has given a legitimate read on who is scum and that his responses to both Salamence and chamber are OMGUSy.
In post 401, Rarity wrote:These past few pages have been very scummy.
Even though I really like a DJ-wagon, and she's still scum, there's still more scum than just her;
For Arugula, it's really unfortunate to replace into a scummy slot and then have to defend said scummy slot. However, nothing he's posted has made him seem more likely to be town. In fact, I didn't really feel Godot was too scummy before Arugula replaced in.
Also- Salamence's posts in response to the entire Godot/Arugula situation has really poked at my scumdar; I'd be willing to lynch either Sala or Arugula today.
Unvote: VOTE: Arugula
^
The scummier of the two current wagons.
In post 403, fatlikepig wrote:Salamence not wanting to lynch Arugula makes Trixie question the legitimacy of his reads; if he actually thought Godot was scum, then Arugula replacing in shouldn't have meant anything - scum slot is still scum slot. It seems like a huge leap in reasoning: for town with a legitimate scumread on Godot, that scumread should only begin to change if they start to see town-motivated posts out of Arugula, whereas for Salamence it seemed that he was willing to change his opinion on the slot before anything happened.
So, Sala, now that your plan is out in the open (i.e. useless), do you still think we should lynch Arugula?
In post 404, Katsuki wrote:Eh
I'm I the only one here who didn't find the replace out in itself scummy? :/
In post 404, Katsuki wrote:This new wagon forming up on godotrugula feels odd though I can't place a finger as to how so,
In post 407, Tierce wrote:Bleh. Going back to Post 222, not feeling an Arugula lynch today.
Not feeling a lynch on Salamence wither, though I'm pretty sure that's the kind of slot that will end up dragged to LyLo.
Charlie is still a lovely vote in the name of Discord.
In post 413, Vi wrote:I wouldn't lynch Feysal in this game.In post 412, Tierce wrote:I'm terrible with this scumread thing. What do you think of Feysal?
In post 413, Vi wrote:What say I told you that not both of Sudo_Nym and Konowa are Town?
In post 415, Shmugen wrote:I can dig digging in new spots. I'll take a look too.
In post 421, Sudo_Nym wrote:In post 416, Konowa wrote:In post 261, Konowa wrote:In post 254, Sudo_Nym wrote:ProfessorGodot did the right thing when the chips were down and a step from lynch; he made a claim, and it was a good claim. VT claim is not enough to clear him, but I think the path of wisdom is to grant the benefit of the doubt.
Since when has VT claims given someone benefit of the doubt?
Is his benefit based solely on flavor, or....?
Still waiting on a response to this.
Was barely worthy of a response. Since when does somebody who makes a good claim not deserve the benefit of the doubt. Maybe you missed the part where I said that a VT claim is not a clear? Or maybe you failed reading comprehension in school?
In post 425, chamber wrote:In post 423, DJ P0n-3 wrote:To see whether you'd get defensive.
How would you define defensive? In this context what would me having gotten defensive told you?
In post 427, Arugula wrote:In post 402, Charlie wrote:Arugula, please claim.
Godot already claimed. I'm Cheerilee, the Educator Pony. VT.
Konowa wrote:
Regarding Arugula’s entrance, still do not feel like he has given a legitimate read on who is scum and that his responses to both Salamence and chamber are OMGUSy.
I didn't make a huge catchup post, but if you have a question, ask. Do you think Salamence and chamber acted like town in my exchange with them.
Also, I just got back from the beach and haven't had a chance to ISO yet.
In post 417, Charlie wrote:Dear Princess Lun-
[Source: lamiaaaa on dA]
I learned nothing today.
fatlikepig wrote:Charlie: Why the heck do you want a claim out of someone who's at L-3 and who you aren't even voting for?
What?? Are you even paying attention? Ask yourself why I'm asking this of him. If you can't find why then I'll point it out for you but you owe me a muffin.
In post 426, DJ P0n-3 wrote:This post makes less than no sense.
You thought he was scummy previously, and replacing out makes him even scummier, but your scum read was strong enough that you don't want to hold it above his replacement's head? What?
If the slot is scum it's scum.
In post 428, DJ P0n-3 wrote:Your other question is directly at odds with advice you gave Salamence earlier
in during everythingSalamence 419 wrote:What did I say that was illogical?
(inb4 everything)
I'm being bad and feeling kind of good about it. :3DJ P0n-3 422 wrote:tl;dr You[Vi]are being bad and you should feel bad.
Actually we're battling to see who's most entertaining.DJ P0n-3 428 wrote:[Charlie]and Vi are having a battle to see who can be the most useless.
False dichotomy. I said thatDJ P0n-3 428 wrote:Why so[in re: not both of Sudo and Konowa-Town]? And which one?
Hint: One is much more likely to be town, and it's not hard to tell which. I'm interested to know which you think it is.
In post 429, DJ P0n-3 wrote:In post 427, Arugula wrote:In post 402, Charlie wrote:Arugula, please claim.
Godot already claimed. I'm Cheerilee, the Educator Pony. VT.
Konowa wrote:
Regarding Arugula’s entrance, still do not feel like he has given a legitimate read on who is scum and that his responses to both Salamence and chamber are OMGUSy.
I didn't make a huge catchup post, but if you have a question, ask. Do you think Salamence and chamber acted like town in my exchange with them.
Also, I just got back from the beach and haven't had a chance to ISO yet.
Who are your top 3 town picks?
Your top 3 scum picks?
DJ P0n-3 426 wrote:VI
There might or might not bechamber 437 wrote:Does anyone in this game actually have confidence in their ability to read Vi correctly?
That's what we saidchamber 440 wrote:This is a llama game.
DJ-PON3 wrote:You didn't think Godot was too scummy before Arugula replaced in, but now that Arugula's here, he's worth switching off of me, whose wagon you really like, for what reason?
That's pretty badly worded. Another try.
If Godot wasn't too scummy, what's scummier about Arugula? Specifically, what's scummy enough to switch of my wagon, which you've been more than content with riding the whole time?
If it's shameless bandwagoning to put pressure on Arugula, why not say so? As it is, it looks like you were trying to come up with a reason for putting a L-2 vote on someone. But it ends up appearing rather hollow indeed.Any town read I had on your slot just evaporated.
You didn't think Godot was too scummy before Arugula replaced in, but now that Arugula's here, he's worth switching off of me,
putting a L-2 vote on someone.
Eh
I'm I the only one here who didn't find the replace out in itself scummy? :/
In post 445, Tierce wrote:Rather disappointed in Brarity's Post401455, tbqh. That might actually be a scum slot.