This. This was the reason I asked for the target claim, because I see no sensible other target for a 1-shot rolestopper on N1. Quiet masons? Leave them be, scum won't kill them and they are more useful for the "don't lynch these people" aspect anyway. Shadow1psc's claim was the one that, for me, would be more likely to draw what was essentially a 1-shot doctor (AND we can have a missing kill explained here; no use beating a dead horse there, but there's no saying that Aegon didn't try to kill Shadow1psc, in hopes that, if bvoigt-killer succeeded, he could claim to have been roleblocked by the then-dead Shadow1psc;
if
this is the case, obviously AurorusVox cannot be Aegon-aligned).
It makes no sense for MoS-scum to use his role on someone who isn't scum if he gets no actual benefit from it. He would be much better off claiming vanilla and then using that 1-shot on a buddy. I've been a scum rolestopper twice (!) now; once as a result of an invention, in which I admittedly used it on a 'townread', but because the inventor was town and I would have to claim it (Paranoia), and another in which I used it on a killing buddy (Abarat II).
The thing that does give me pause is MoS's questioning of Shadow1psc the next Day. Was it just because he thought Shadow was lying about bvoigt? The roleblocking question does seem out of place because he knew Shadow could NOT have been roleblocked.
In other news, it's useless now, but Lyanna crumbed Motivator in her first post. This Sand Snake will be here laughing modestly at the irony of the Stark pup being such a blooming rose.
UNVOTE: AurorusVox
You had better deliver, Lemon. The rant was heartfelt, I'm seriously disappointed in your play so far.